No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Copulas are not just inflection: Evidence from Tłı̨chǫ Yatıì1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Squib/Notule
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 98 - 106
- Copyright
- © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2016
Footnotes
1
I am very grateful to Marie-Louise Bouvier White, Lena Drygeese, Mary Siemens, and Archie Wedzin for sharing their language with me, and to Susana Béjar, Bronwyn Bjorkman, Arsalan Kahnemuyipour, Leslie Saxon, Andrea Wilhelm, and two anonymous reviewers for discussion, feedback and suggestions on the issues addressed in this paper. The research was supported by the University of Toronto and SSHRC postdoctoral grant #756-2014-0300.
References
Baker, Mark C. 2003. The lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615047Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. and Vinokurova, Nadezda. 2012. Forms of predication in Sakha: Will the true lexical predicates please stand up? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 57(2): 177–207.10.1017/S0008413100004746Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. Jacobs, Roderick and Rosenbaum, Peter S., 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The generic book, ed. Carlson, Gregory N. and Pelletier, Francis J., 125–175). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2004. On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70: 369–415.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates: Predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956Google Scholar
Pustet, Regina. 2003. Copulas: Universals in the categorization of the lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258505.001.0001Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110861822Google Scholar
Tłı̨chǫ Community Services Agency. 2007. Tłı̨chǫ Yatıì Multimedia Dictionary. Accessed 2014 at tlicho.ling.uvic.ca.Google Scholar
Vinokurova, Nadezhda. 2005. Lexical categories and argument structure: a study with reference to Sakha. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Welch, Nicholas. 2012. The bearable lightness of being: The encoding of coincidence in two-copula languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Welch, Nicholas. 2015a. Obligatory tense in a Dene language. International Journal of American Linguistics 81(1): 41–81.10.1086/679042Google Scholar
Welch, Nicholas. 2015b. Deducing clause structure from the right periphery in Tłı̨chǫ Yatıı̀. International Journal of American Linguistics 81(2): 261–291.10.1086/680311Google Scholar
Welch, Nicholas. 2016. Propping up predicates: Adjectival predication in Tłı̨chǫ Yatıì. Glossa, March 2016.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Andrea. 2014. A radically [+arg, –pred] language. Paper presented at SULA 8, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Young, Robert W., Morgan, William Sr., and Midgette, Sally. 1992. Analytical lexicon of Navajo. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong, and Sun, Chaofen. 2013. A copula analysis of shì in the Chinese cleft construction. Language and Linguistics 14(4): 755–789.Google Scholar