Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:33:41.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Articles of Italian unite! Italian definite articles without allomorphy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2018

Noam Faust ,
Nicola Lampitelli  and
Shanti Ulfsbjorninn
Noam Faust*
Affiliation:
Université Paris 8, CNRS SFL
Nicola Lampitelli*
Affiliation:
Université de Tours, CNRS LLL UMR 7270
Shanti Ulfsbjorninn*
Affiliation:
University College London
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the various realizations of the Italian definite article and concludes, against all previous accounts of this phenomenon, that neither the singular nor the plural realizations constitute a case of allomorphy stricto sensu. Significantly extending Larsen's (1998) analysis, the paper argues that all of the realizations of the definite article, including the problematic [i] and [ʎi], share a single underlying representation. It is proposed that the definite article is associated with a template with separate sites for definiteness and φ-features. It is further argued that [ʎ] is not a primitive entity in Italian; rather, it emerges from a very specific configuration in which /i/ and /l/ are conjoined and followed by a second realized vowel /i/. The templatic and segmental decompositions yield a morphologically unified analysis in which all of the realizations of the definite article are based on a single lexical representation followed by the application of regular phonology.

Résumé

Dans cet article, nous nous concentrons sur les différentes réalisations de surface de l'article défini de l'italien et proposons, à l'encontre de toute analyse précédente, qu'aucune de ces réalisations n'est un exemple d'allomorphie au sens strict. En étendant considérablement l'analyse de Larsen (1998), nous faisons l'hypothèse que toutes les réalisations de l'article défini, y compris les formes problématiques [i] et [ʎi], partagent une forme sous-jacente unique. Nous proposons d'abord que l'article défini soit associé à un gabarit possédant deux sites séparés qui sont réservés, respectivement, à la réalisation de la définitude et aux traits φ. Ensuite, nous montrons que [ʎ] n'est pas un objet primitif de l'italien : il dérive plutôt d'une configuration spécifique dans laquelle /i/ et /l/ sont fusionnés et suivis d'une deuxième voyelle réalisée /i/. La décomposition à la fois gabaritique et segmentale favorise une analyse morphologique unifiée dans laquelle toutes les formes réalisées de l'article défini sont dérivées d'une représentation lexicale unique par l'application régulière de la phonologie.

Keywords

allomorphyarticleItalianpalatalizationCVCV Phonologyallomorphiearticleitalienpalatalisationphonologie CVCV
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 359 - 385
Copyright
© Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D'Achille, Paolo. 2016a. Architettura dell'italiano di oggi e linee di tendenza. In manuale di linguistica italiana [Manual of Italian linguistics], ed. Lubello, Sergio, 165–189. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
D'Achille, Paolo. 2016b. Lo, gli, li, loro: un sistema pronominale non facile da usare [Lo, gli, li, loro : A pronominal system that is not easy to use]. Website of the Accademia della Crusca (Academy of the Italian Language), accessible at: <http://www.accademiadellacrusca.it/it/lingua-italiana/consulenza-linguistica/domande-risposte/sistema-pronominale-facile-usare> (last access on January 23rd, 2018).+(last+access+on+January+23rd,+2018).>Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2009. The structure of the Italian declension system. In Selected Proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux, ed. Montermini, Fabio, Boyé, Gilles, and Tseng, Jesse, 50–62. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Artés, Eduard. 2013. Morphological epenthesis in Romance: A case for Lexical Conservatism. Poster presented at 39th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy), 21–23 February, 2013.Google Scholar
Backley, Philip. 2011. An introduction to element theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baroni, Antonio. 2011. Italian article allomorphy and the treatment of initial glides. Paper presented at the Departmental Seminar on 10 November, 2011. University of Padova.Google Scholar
Bendjaballah, Sabrina. 1999. Trois figures de la structure interne des gabarits. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris 7.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, and Loporcaro, Michele. 2005. The sound pattern of Standard Italian, as compared with the varieties spoken in Florence, Milan and Rome. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35: 131–151.Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 2012. Sociolinguistica dell'italiano contemporaneo [Sociolinguistics of contemporary Italian]. rev. ed. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia, and Lloret, Maria-Rosa. 2016. Romance phonology and morphology in Optimality Theory. In Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, ed. Fischer, Susann and Gabriel, Christoph, 113–147. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1991. On pronoun movement: the Italian dative “loro”. Probus 3(2): 127–153.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Repetti, Lori. 2007. Vocali epentetiche nella morfologia dell'italiano e dei dialetti italiani [Epenthetic vowels in the morphology of Italian and Italian dialects]. In Miscellanea di studi linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani [Miscellany of linguistic studies offered to Laura Vanelli by friends and students from Padua], ed. Maschi, Roberta, Penello, Nicoletta, and Rizzolatti, Piera, 115–126. Forum Udine: Editrice.Google Scholar
Casali, Roderic F. 2011. Hiatus resolution. In The Blackwell companion to phonology vol. 3, ed. van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren, 1434–1460. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cavirani, Edoardo. 2015. Carrarino syllabic structure. In The notion of syllable across history, theories and analysis, ed. Russo, Domenico, 210–240. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Charette, Monik. 1991. Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charette, Monik. 2003. Empty and pseudo-empty categories. In Living on the edge: 28 Papers in honour of Jonathan Kaye, ed. Ploch, Stephen, 465–480. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1986. Length, syllabification, and the phonological cycle in Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8: 5–34.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2011. French liaison. In The Blackwell companion to phonology vol 5, ed. van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren, 2685–2710. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 1990. Italian onset structure and the distribution of il and lo. Linguistics, 28:43–55.Google Scholar
Faust, Noam. 2014. Templatic metathesis in Tigre imperatives. Phonology 31(2): 209–227.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, Maria. 2008. On the application of velar palatalization in Italian. In Proceedings of the 27 th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics Poster Session, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, ed. Kevin Ryan, 20–29.Google Scholar
Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2001. An OT account of the distribution of articles in Italian. In Proceedings of the fifth South Western Optimality Theory workshop, ed. Cowles, Wind, Godson, Linda, Hickl, Andy, Munoz, Alicia, Nieddu, Paola, O'Bryan, Todd, and Tonomura, Heidi, 1–18. La Jolla: Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1979. Autosegmental Phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hajek, John, Stevens, Mary, and Webster, Georgia. 2007. Vowel duration, compression and lengthening in stressed syllables in Italian. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) 25, ed. Trouvain, Jürgen, and Barry, William J., 1057–1060. Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
D'Imperio, Mariapaola, and Rosenthall, Sam. 1999. Phonetics and phonology of main stress in Italian. Phonology 16(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. 1990. ‘Coda’-Licensing. Phonology 7(2): 301–330.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1985. The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of Charm and Government. Phonology Yearbook 2: 305–328.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology Yearbook 7: 193–231.Google Scholar
Krämer, Martin. 2009. The Phonology of Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lai, Rosangela. 2015. Word-initial geminates in Sardinian. Quaderni di linguistica e studi orientali 1: 37–60.Google Scholar
Lampitelli, Nicola. 2010. Nounness, gender, class and syntactic structures in Italian nouns. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2008. Selected Papers from “Going Romance” Groningen 2008, ed. Bok-Bennema, Reineke, Kampers-Mahne, Brigitte, and Hollebrandse, Bart, 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Larsen, Bergeton Uffe. 1998. Vowel length, Raddoppiamento Sintattico and the selection of the definite article in Italian. In Langues et Grammaire II–III, Phonologie, ed. Sauzet, Patrick, 87–102. Paris: Université Paris 8.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 1996. CV as the only syllable type. In Current trends in phonology models and methods, ed. Durand, Jacques and Laks, Bernard, 419–442. Salford: European Studies Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2000. The image of a segment. In Naturally! Linguistic studies in honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday, ed. Schaner-Wolles, Chris, Rennison, John, and Neubarth, Friedrich, 281–290. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin, and Robustelli, Cecilia. 2007. A reference grammar of modern Italian. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1993. Selezione dell'articolo e sillaba in italiano: un'interzione totale? [Selection of the article and syllable in Italian: total interaction?] Archivio Glottologico Italiano 15: 255–296.Google Scholar
McCrary, Kristie Marie. 2004. Reassessing the role of the syllable in Italian phonology: An experimental study of consonant cluster syllabification, definite article allomorphy and segment duration. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Muljaćič, Žarko. 1971. Gli allofoni /il/, /lo/ e /l/ e la fonologia jakobsoniana [The allophones /il/, /lo/, and /l/ and Jakobsonian phonology]. Lingua Nostra 32: 82–84.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina. 1993. Le strutture del linguaggio: Fonologia [The structures of language: Phonology]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol 4, ed. van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth, and Rice, Keren, 2357–2382. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Passino, Diana. 2009. An element-based analysis of Italian inflection. In Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes 6, ed. Montermini, Fabio, Boyé, Gilles, and Tseng, Jesse, 63–75. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary. 2014. Allomorphy. In The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, ed. Lieber, Rochelle and Štekauer, Pavol, 219–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romano, Antonio. 2003a. Geminate iniziali salentine: un contributo di fonetica strumentale alle ricerche sulla geminazione consonantica [Initial geminates in Salentino: A contribution of instrumental phonetics to research on consonant gemination]. In Parole romanze. Scritti per Michele Contini, ed. Caprini, Rita, 349–376. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Romano, Antonio. 2003b. Indici acustici di alcune geminate iniziali salentine [Acoustic indices of some initial geminates in Salentino]. In La coarticolazione [Coarticulation] (Atti delle XIII Giornate di Studio del GFS, Pisa, 26–28 Novembre 2002), ed. Marotta, Giovanna and Nocchi, Nadia, 233–241. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Russi, Cinzia. 2006. A usage-based analysis of the allomorphy of the Italian masculine definite article. Studies in Language 30(3): 575–598.Google Scholar
Russi, Cinzia. 2008. Italian clitics. An empirical study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2004. A lateral theory of phonology. Vol 1: What is CVCV, and why should it be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2015. Précis de structure syllabique. Lyon: Éditions ENS.Google Scholar
Serianni, Luca. 1989. Grammatica italiana [Italian grammar]. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Steriade, , Donca., 1982. Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard, and Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2002. Local conjunction in Italian and French phonology. In Romance phonology and variation, ed. Wiltshire, Caroline and Camps, Joaquim, 191–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ulfsbjorninn, Shanti. 2016. Ternary feet without embedding or recursion: Standard Italian and Chugach. Paper presented at Hierarchical Structures in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Ulfsbjorninn, Shanti. 2017. Bogus clusters and lenition in Tuscan Italian: Implications for the theory of sonority. In Sonic Signatures, ed. Lindsey, Geoff and Nevins, Andrew, 278–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vanelli, Laura. 1992. Da “lo” a “il”. Rivista italiana di dialettologia 16: 29–66.Google Scholar