No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Article compte-rendu: Le Maître de Genève
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Article/Article Compte-Rendu
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 223 - 241
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2004
References
Références
Bally, Charles. 1940. L’arbitraire du signe: valeur et signification. Le Français Moderne
3:193–206.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1996. Sign languages and language universals: The status of order and position in grammar. Sign Language Studies
91:101–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces: Why languages vary. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Bouquet, Simon. 1999. La linguistique générale de Ferdinand de Saussure: textes et retour aux textes. Communication inédite présentée au Congrès ICHOLS (International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences), septembre 1999.Google Scholar
Bouquet, Simon et Engler, Rudolf. 2002. Ecrits de linguistique générale par Ferdinand de Saussure. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. In The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, sous la dir. Fodor, de Jerry A. et Katz, Jerrold J., 50–118. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1990. Topic … comment: On formalization and formal linguistics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
8:143–147.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1992
Language and interpretation: Philosophical reflections and empirical inquiry. In Inference, explanation, and other frustrations: Essays in the philosophy of science, sous la dir. Earman, de John, 99–128. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. MIT Linguistics Department, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, sous la dir. Martin, de Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, Ewan, Pullum, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A.. 1985. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert. 1957. Les sources manuscrites du cours de linguistique générale. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert. 1970. Théorie de la phrase. In La sintassi. Atti del III convegno della Società di Linguistica Italiana, 11–41. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark and Reiss, Charles. 2000. Substance abuse and dysfunctionalism: Current trends in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry
31:157–169.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.O.
1956. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Fundamentals of language, sous la dir. Jakobson, de Roman et Halle, Morris, 52–82. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1974. Interview. In Discussing language, sous la dir. Parret, de Herman, 151–178. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar