We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Références
Bally, Charles. 1940. L’arbitraire du signe: valeur et signification. Le Français Moderne3:193–206.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1995. The semantics of syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1996. Sign languages and language universals: The status of order and position in grammar. Sign Language Studies91:101–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces: Why languages vary. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Bouquet, Simon. 1999. La linguistique générale de Ferdinand de Saussure: textes et retour aux textes. Communication inédite présentée au Congrès ICHOLS (International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences), septembre 1999.Google Scholar
Bouquet, Simon et Engler, Rudolf. 2002. Ecrits de linguistique générale par Ferdinand de Saussure. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. In The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, sous la dir. Fodor, de Jerry A. et Katz, Jerrold J., 50–118. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1990. Topic … comment: On formalization and formal linguistics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory8:143–147.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1992Language and interpretation: Philosophical reflections and empirical inquiry. In Inference, explanation, and other frustrations: Essays in the philosophy of science, sous la dir. Earman, de John, 99–128. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. MIT Linguistics Department, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, sous la dir. Martin, de Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald, Klein, Ewan, Pullum, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A.. 1985. Generalized phrase structure grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert. 1957. Les sources manuscrites du cours de linguistique générale. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert. 1970. Théorie de la phrase. In La sintassi. Atti del III convegno della Società di Linguistica Italiana, 11–41. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark and Reiss, Charles. 2000. Substance abuse and dysfunctionalism: Current trends in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry31:157–169.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.O.1956. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Fundamentals of language, sous la dir. Jakobson, de Roman et Halle, Morris, 52–82. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1974. Interview. In Discussing language, sous la dir. Parret, de Herman, 151–178. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1968. Introduction à la grammaire generative. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique préparée par Tullio de Mauro. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar