Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:40:46.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal Grammar in Language Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Sascha W. Felix
Sascha W. Felix*
Affiliation:
University of Passau
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Progress in linguistic theory during the past 20 years has made it increasingly clear that language acquisition must be viewed as an essentially deductive process in which the child analyzes the input data s/he is exposed to on the basis of an innately specified set of restrictive principles — technically known as Universal Grammar — which narrowly constrain the kinds of hypotheses a child will consider vis-à-vis a given set of data (cf. Chomsky 1980, 1981, 1986; Hornstein and Lightfoot 1981; White 1982; Felix 1987). As a consequence, there is a growing interest in the question of how exactly principles of Universal Grammar interact with the child’s linguistic experience during the course of language acquisition (see e.g., Pinker 1984; Hyams 1986; Lust 1986b; Roeper and Williams 1987 among others for some more recent proposals). It appears that there are currently at least two competing views about the nature of this interaction. One of these views which I shall call “perceptionism” holds that the task of Universal Grammar (UG) is essentially restricted to constraining the types of intermediate grammars that the child will construct, while the developmental process itself is essentially data-driven, i.e., driven by the child’s (changing) perception of the external evidence. The other view which may be termed “maturationism” claims that UG is both responsible for the types of (intermediate) grammars that in principle may emerge and at the same time for the specific nature of the developmental process. Under the maturationist view language acquisition is therefore seen as a process that is driven primarily by internal, i.e., biologically determined maturational mechanisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Linguistic Theory and External Evidence , December 1988 , pp. 367 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C.L. 1979 Syntactic Theory and the Projection Problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10:533–581.Google Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula 1967 The Acquisition of the System of Negation in Children’s Speech. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bellugi, Ursula, and Brown, Roger, eds. 1964 The Acquisition of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois 1970 Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Lois 1973 One Word at a Time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit, and Wexler, Kenneth 1987 The Maturation of Syntax. Pp. 123–172 in Parameter Setting. Roeper, Tom and Williams, Edwin, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, T. 1974 Development in Infancy. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa 1973 Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-Linguistic Study with Special References to Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braine, Martin 1963 The Ontogeny of English Phrase Structure: The First Phase. Language 39:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger 1973 A First Language: The Early Stages. London: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Fraser, C. 1963 The Acquisition of Syntax. Pp. 158–197 in Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes. Cofer, C. and Musgrave, A., eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1980 Rules and Representation. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1987a Language and Other Cognitive Systems. Paper presented at Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1987b On the Nature, Use and Acquisition of Language. Ms.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald 1987 Normale und gestörte Kindersprache. Linguistische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Syntax und Morphologie. Ms.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cofer, C., and Musgrave, A., eds. 1963 Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen 1979 Typology of Sentence Negation. Linguistics 17:79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Allan, Criper, Clive, and Howatt, A., eds. 1984 Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha W., 1980 Cognition and Language Development: A German Child’s Acquisi tion of Question Word. Pp. 91–110 in Studies in Language Acquisition. Nehls, Dietrich, ed. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha W., 1984 Maturational Aspects of Universal Grammar. Pp. 133–161 in Interlanguage. Davis, Allan, Criper, Clive, and Howatt, A., eds. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha W., 1987 Cognition and Language Growth. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, Sascha W., 1988 Language Acquisition as a Maturational Process. Ms.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles, and Slobin, Dan, eds. 1973 Studies of Child Language Development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet A. 1975 The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet A. 1983 The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, Lila 1981 Maturational Constraints of Language Growth. Cognition 10:103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodluck, Helen, and Solan, Lawrence, eds. 1978 Papers in the Structure and Development of Child Language. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jerry 1973 Correlations between the Syntactic Constructions of the Child and the Adult. Pp. 440–445 in Studies of Child Language Development. Ferguson, Charles and Slobin, Dan, eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, and Lightfoot, David 1981 Explanation in Linguistic Theory (Introduction). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina 1986 Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, Celia 1984 On Markedness and Binding Principles. Pp. 154–18 in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 14. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard 1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward, and Bellugi, Ursula 1973 Syntatic Regularities in the Speech of Children. Pp. 333–354 in Studies of Child Language Development. Ferguson, Charles and Slobin, Dan, eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lust, Barbara 1981 Constraints on Anaphora in Child Language: A Prediction for a Universal. Pp. 74–96 in Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Tavakolian, Susan, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lust, Barbara 1986a Introduction. Pp. 3–103 in Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora: Defining the Constraints. Lust, Barbara, ed. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, Barbara, ed. 1986b Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora: Defining the Constraints. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita, and Wexler, Kenneth 1987 Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18:413–444.Google Scholar
Matthei, Edward 1981 Children’s Interpretation of Sentences Containing Reciprocals. Pp. 97–115 in Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Tavakolian, Susan, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, W., and Ervin, Susan 1964 The Development of Grammar in Child Language. Pp. 9–34 in The Acquisition of Language. Bellugi, Ursula and Brown, Roger, eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Muysken, Pieter 1987 Against Percolation. Paper presented at World Congress of Linguistics. Berlin, GDR. August 1987.Google Scholar
Nehls, Dietrich, ed. 1980 Studies in Language Acquisition. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Neijt, Anneke 1979 Gapping. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, T., and Roeper, Tom 1987 Deductive Parameters and the Growth of Empty Categories. Pp. 91–121 in Parameter Setting. Roeper, Tom and Williams, Edwin, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Susan 1987 Zum “substantivierten” Adjectiv im Deutschen: Deutsch als eine Pro-Drop Sprache. Studium Linguistik 21:1–35.Google Scholar
Otsu, Y. 1981 Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David 1982 Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo, ed. 1980 Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven 1984 Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Read, Charles, and Hare, V. 1977 Children’s Interpretation of Reflexive Pronouns in English. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual University of Wisconsin/Milwaukee Linguistics Symposium.Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom 1986 How Children Acquire Bound Variables. Pp. 191–199 in Parameter Setting. Roeper, Tom and Williams, Edwin, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom, and Williams, Edwin, eds. 1987 Parameter Setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiefelbusch, R., and Lloyd, L., eds. 1974 Language Perspectives: Acquisition, Retardation and Intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. 1974 Relational Concepts Underlying Language. Pp. 129–151 in Language Perspectives: Acquisition, Retardation and Intervention. Schiefelbusch, R. and Lloyd, L., eds. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence 1981 The Acquisition of Structural Restrictions on Anaphora. Pp. 59–73 in Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Tavakolian, Susan, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim 1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Tavakolian, Susan 1978 Children’s Comprehension of Pronominal Subjects and Missing Subjects in Complicated Sentences. In Papers in the Structure and Development of Child Language. Goodluck, Helen and Solan, Lawrence, eds. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4.Google Scholar
Tavakolian, Susan, ed. 1981 Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, T. 1974 The Slow Speech Development of a Bright Child. Lexington, Mass.: Heath.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth 1987 On Maturation in Language Development. Paper presented at the World Congress of Linguistics. Berlin, GDR. August 1987.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Manzini, Rita 1987 Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory. Pp. 41–77 in Parameter Setting. Roeper, Tom and Williams, Edwin, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia 1982 Grammatical Theory and Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, Henning 1976 Some Stages in the Acquisition of Questions by Monolingual Children. Word 27:261–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, Henning 1977 Four Early States in the Development of L1 Negation. Journal of Child Language 4:87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar