Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:00:01.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tenetehára: A predicate-fronting language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Fábio Bonfim Duarte
Fábio Bonfim Duarte*
Affiliation:
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates whether Tenetehára is a predicate-raising language. The purpose is to determine whether VSO order results from verb movement to the heads T0 or C0 only, or whether Tenetehára exhibits VP remnant movement, similarly to languages like Niuean, Choi, Malagasy, and Seediq. The analysis concludes that Tenetehára does allow predicate movement, to Spec-CP or Spec-TP. Either option depends on particles related to tense and complementation, in sentence-final position. Additionally, assuming Kayne’s antisymmetry theory, in which all movement occurs to the left, and the predicate-raising hypothesis, it is proposed that final tense particle orders are derived from the basic word order [Tense [SVO]]. To derive the fact that T0 can be head-final, the analysis holds that the predicate, represented by the v-VP complex, must move to the specifier position of TP. Finally, it is proposed that the syntactic trigger for predicate-raising is the presence of a [+PRED] feature both in the head C0 and in the head T0, a fact that explains why Tenetehára grammar systematically strands tense and complementizer particles in clause-final position.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article tente de déterminer si la langue tenetehára est une langue à prédicat à montée. Le but de l’étude est de vérifier si l’ordre VSO résulte du mouvement du verbe vers les têtes T0 ou C0, ou s’il s’agit du mouvement d’un constituant vestige, comme en niuéen, chol, malgache et seediq. L’analyse conclut que le tenetehára autorise le mouvement du prédicat aussi bien vers Spéc-CP que vers Spéc-TP. Ces options dépendent de particules en position finale de phrase et qui se rapportent au temps ou à la complémentation. En outre, compte tenu de la théorie antisymétrique de Kayne selon laquelle tout mouvement se réalise vers la gauche, et de l’hypothèse du prédicat à montée, on propose que l’ordre final des particules de temps résulte de l’ordre fondamental [Temps [SVO]]. Ainsi, pour conclure que T0 peut être tête finale en tenetehára, l’analyse présume que le prédicat, représenté par le complexe v-VP, doit se déplacer vers la position de spécifieur du TP. L’article propose enfin que le déclencheur syntaxique qui force le prédicat à monter est la présence d’un trait [+PRED] aussi bien dans la tête de C0 que dans celle de T0, ce qui explique pourquoi les particules du temps et du complémenteur se retrouvent systématiquement dans la position finale de la phrase.

Keywords

final particlesremnant movementantisymmetryminimalismTupí-Guaraníparticules finalesconstituant vestigeantisymétrieminimalismetupíguaraní
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 359 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bendor-Samuel, D. 1972. Hierarchical structures in Guajajára. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, Norman.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, and Roberts, Ian. To appear. A syntactic universal and its consequences. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry. Unpublished version available at: research.ncl.ac.uk/linearization/BHR_2010.pdf.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Carnie, Andrew. 1996. A minimalist approach to some problems of Irish word order. In The syntax of the Celtic languages, ed. Roberts, Ian and Borsley, Robert, pp. 223–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Jonas, Diane. 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27:195–236.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two heads aren’t better than one. Syntax 1:37–71.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 1995. Nonverbal predication and head movement. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew, Harley, Heidi, and Pyatt, Elizabeth. 2000. VSO order as raising out of IP? Some evidence from Old Irish. In The syntax of verb initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew and Guilfoyle, Eithne, pp. 39–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Márcia G.P. 2001. Sinais de Morte ou de Vitalidade? Mudanças estruturais na Língua Tembé. Master’s thesis, Federal University of Pará.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 2005. What fronts? On the VP-raising account of verb-initial order. In Verb first: Studies in predicate initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew, Harley, Heidi, and Dooley-Colburg, Sheila, pp. 9–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 2006. Properties of VOS languages. In The Blackwell companion to syntax (syncom), ed. Everaert, Martin, Riemsdijk, Henk van, Goedemans, Rob, and Hollebrandse, Bart, pp. 685–720. Maiden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2010. VOS as predicate-fronting in Choi. Lingua 120:345–378.Google Scholar
Diesmg, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1996. Semantic variables and object shift. In Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, vol. 2, ed. Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Epstein, Samuel D., and Peter, Steven, pp. 66–84. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1997. Yiddish VP order and the typology and object movement in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15:369–427Google Scholar
Doron, Edit. 2000. VSO and left-conjunct agreement: Biblical Hebrew vs. modern Hebrew. In The syntax of verb-initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew and Guilfoyle, Eithne, pp. 75–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duarte, Fábio Bonfim. 1997. Grammatical analysis of the Tembé clauses. Master’s thesis, Brasilia University.Google Scholar
Duarte, Fábio Bonfim. 2003. Order of constituents and movement in Tembé: Minimalism and antisymmetry. Doctoral dissertation, Federal University of Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Duarte, Fábio Bonfim. 2007. Studies in Tenetehára morphosyntax. Belo Horizonte: Fale- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, Carl. 1986. Verb prominence, verb initialness, ergativity, and typological disharmony in Guajajára. In Handbook of Amazonian languages, ed. Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K., pp. 407–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1989. The case split and argument type in Choctaw. In Configurationality: The typology of asymmetries, ed. Maracz, Lazlo and Muysken, Pieter, pp. 117–141. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 25. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holmer, Arthur. 2005. Seediq: Antisymmetry and final particles in a Formosan VOS language. In Verb first: Studies in predicate initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew, Harley, Heidi, and Dooley-Colburg, Sheila, pp. 175–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. Rooryck, Jan and Zaring, Laurie, pp. 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lee, Felicia. 2000. VP remnant movement and VSO in Quiaviní Zapotee. In The syntax of verb-initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew and Guilfoyle, E., pp. 143–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 2000. VSO and VOS: Aspects of Niuean word order. In The syntax of verb initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew and Guilfoyle, Eithne, pp. 97–116. Oxford: Oxford University Presss.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19:153–197.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 2005. Predicate fronting and lexical category in Niuean. In Verb first: Studies in predicate initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew, Harley, Heidi, and Dooley-Colburg, Sheila, pp. 227–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane and Smallwood, Caroline. 1997. Essential features of predication in English and Niuean. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 27, ed. Kusumoto, K., pp. 236–272. Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLS A), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1996. On the scope of verb movement in Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14:47–104.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 2000. Irish, the EPP and PRO. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris. 1994. The Tupí-Guaraní inverse. In Voice: Form and function, ed. Fox, Barbara and Hopper, Paul, pp. 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea, and Travis, Lisa. 2000. V-initial languages: X or XP movement and adverbial placement. In The syntax of verb initial languages, ed. Carnie, Andrew and Guilfoyle, Eithne, pp. 117–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Handbook of generative syntax, ed. Haegeman, Liliane. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A.D. 1986. Línguas Brasileiras: Para o conhecimento das línguas indígenas. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Loyola.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A.D. 1996. Argumento e predicado em Tupinambá. In Boletim da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, 19:57–66.Google Scholar
Seiter, William. 1980. Studies in Niuean syntax. Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy. 1990. Kamaiurá (Tupí-Guaraní) as an Active-Stative Language. In Amazonian linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languages, ed. Payne, D.L., pp. 367–391. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática do Kamaiurá: Língua Tupí-Guaraní do Alto Xingu. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP e Imprensa Oficial de São Paulo.Google Scholar