Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:34:55.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preference Laws and Gradient Change: Selected Developments in Romance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Robert W. Murray
Robert W. Murray*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper has two purposes. The first is to focus attention on the gradient nature of sound change. This characteristic of sound change, although an important one, is often overlooked. King (1969: 122), for example, states: “Phonological changes tend to affect natural classes of sounds (p, t, k, high vowels, voiced stops) because rules that affect natural classes are simpler than rules that apply only to single segments.” This perspective obscures the generalization pattern of phonological processes, for a particular process typically affects a subsection of a natural class and then may (or may not) generalize to other members of the particular class or even to other classes. The second purpose of this paper is to account for selected cases of gradient phonological change in Italian and other Romance languages on the basis of a partial theory of syllable structure preferences.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 115 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Foley, James 1977 Foundations of Theoretical Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan Bybee 1976 An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. 1969 Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1981 Remarks on the Metrical Structure of the Syllable. Pp. 245–256 in Phonologica 1980. Dressler, Wolfgang U., ed. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. 1972 Romanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. 5th ed. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 1982 Consonant Cluster Developments in Pāli. Folia Linguistica Historica 3:163–184.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 1986 Urgermanische Silbenstruktur und die westgermanische Konsonantengemination. Beiträge zur Geschichłe der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 108:333–356.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 1987 Phonological Strength and Early Germanic Syllable Structure. Munich: Niemeyer. [In press].Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W., and Vennemann, Theo 1982 Syllable Contact Change in Germanic, Greek, and Sidamo. Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 8:321–349.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W., and Vennemann, Theo 1983 Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology. Language 59:514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Edward 1939 A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard 1949 Historische Grammatik der Italienischen Sprache und ihrer Mundarten, vol. 1. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984 On the Major “Class Features and Syllable Theory. Pp. 107–136 in Language Sound Structure, Aronoff, Mark and Oehrle, Richard T., eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard 1901 Grundzüge der Phonetik zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. 5th ed. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1972 On the Theory of Syllabic Phonology. Linguistische Berichte 18:1–18.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1982 Zur Silbenstruktur der deutschen Standardsprache. Pp. 261–305 in Silben, Segmente, Akzente, Vennemann, Theo, ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1983 Causality in Language Change. Folia Linguistica Historica 6:5–26.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1984 Hochgermanisch und Niedergermanisch. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 106:1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1986 The Bifurcation Theory of the Germanic and German Consonant Shifts. Pp. 527–547 in Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Fisiak, Jacek, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1987 Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Nigel 1973 On Gemination in Italian and West Germanic. Ms.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin B. 1962 From Latin to Portuguese. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar