Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:28:18.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Palatal” and “palatalized” redefined

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

R. C. De Armond
R. C. De Armond*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to show that the term “palatal” has been used with various meanings and to redefine or establish a consistency of terminology concerning this term with respect to palatalized and central consonants. Confusion arising from the various divisions of the tongue into articulators and from the misuse of the above articulatory terms has led to incorrect phonological solutions.

The status of Russian palatalized and palatal consonants has been under discussion recently. Dunatov claims in a recent article that Russian palatal consonants cannot be palatalized and suggests three different orders of palatals to distinguish “the three articulatory sets of palatals encountered in the Slavic languages”: pre-palatal, medio-palatal, and post-palatal. However, he fails to state the distribution of them in Russian or the other Slavic languages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1966 , pp. 109 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dunatov, Rasio, “Palatalized and Palatal—a Definition,” The Slavic and East European Journal 7, 4 (1963), p. 402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid., p. 404.

3 Schmalstieg, William R., “Palatalized and Palatal—a Sharp Compact Acute Definition,” SEEJ 8, 2 (1964), p. 182 Google Scholar.

4 Bloch, B. and Trager, G., Outline of Linguistic Analysis (Baltimore, 1942), p. 15 Google Scholar.

5 Ibid.

6 Ibid.

7 Hockett, Charles F., A Course in Modern Linguistics (New York, 1958), p. 72.Google Scholar

8 Galkina-Fedoruk, E. M., Gorškova, K. V., Šanskij, N. M., Sovremennyj Russkij Jazyk (Moscow, 1962), p. 154 Google Scholar.

9 Ibid., p. 159, and Skalozub, L. G., Palatogrammy i rentgenogrammy soglasnyx fonem russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (Kiev, 1963), p. 56 Google Scholar.

10 Galkina-Fedoruk, et al., p. 162 Google Scholar and Skaluzub, , Palatogrammy, pp. 57–58 Google Scholar.

11 Hockett, , Course, pp. 69–70 Google Scholar.

12 Szober, Stanislaw, Gramatyka języka polskiego (Warsaw, 1959), p. 18 Google Scholar.

13 Dunatov, “Palatalized and Palatal.”

14 Bloch and Trager, Outline, p. 30.

15 Galkina-Fedoruk et al., p. 159.

16 Ibid.

17 Ibid.

18 Bryzgunova, E. A., Praktičeskaja fonetika i intonacija russkogo jazyka (Moscow, 1963), p. 110 Google Scholar.

19 Ibid., p. 107.

20 Gvozdev, A. N., Sovremennyj russkij literaturnyj jazyk (Moscow, 1961), p. 17 Google Scholar.

21 Avanesov, R. I., Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (Moscow, 1958), p. 167 Google Scholar.

22 Diagram I is copied from Bryzgunova, Praktičeskaja fonetika, p. 105.

23 Lehr-Spławiński, Tadeusz and Kubiński, Roman, Gramatyka języka polskiego (Lwów, 1903), p. 12–15 Google Scholar.

24 Galkina-Fedoruk et al., p. 166.

25 By definition a central consonant cannot be palatalized; [c] and [3] lack palatalized counterparts only by historical accidence.