Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:50:15.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Existentials and Partitives in Malagasy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Ileana Paul
Ileana Paul*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the existential construction in Malagasy, focussing on the distribution and interpretation of nominals. It is argued that the existential construction involves the raising of specific NPs out of the small clause complement of the existential verb misy. Nonspecific NPs, on the other hand, are shown to remain within the complement. That raising correlates with interpretation provides evidence in favour of the Mapping Hypothesis of Diesing (1992). Although the syntactic analysis accounts for the specific/nonspecific distribution in the existential construction, it leaves unexplained the precise interpretation of the specific NP, which may be either partitive, possessive, or locative. This article therefore argues for a relation, PARTITIVE, which unites these three readings.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article décrit la construction existentielle en malgache et rend compte de la distribution et de l’interprétation des syntagmes nominaux. Il est montré que les syntagmes nominaux spécifiques se déplacent à l’extérieur de la petite proposition complément du verbe existentiel misy alors que les syntagmes nominaux non-spécifiques demeurent dans leur position de base. Cette corrélation entre la position des syntagmes nominaux et leur interprétation appuie l’hypothèse d’appariement (Mapping Hypothesis) de Diesing (1992). Cependant, cette analyse structurale ne rend pas compte de l’interprétation précise attribuée aux syntagmes nominaux spécifiques, qu’il s’agisse de l’interprétation partitive, possessive ou locative. Afin d’unifier ces trois interprétations, la relation sémantique PARTITIVE est proposée.

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 43 , Special Issue 3-4: Arguments and Structure in Austronesian Languages , December 1998 , pp. 377 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Barbara. 1995. Some remarks on specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 26:341–347.Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon, and Cooper, Robin. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The Case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19:1–34.Google Scholar
Burton, Strang. 1996. Past tense on nouns as death, destruction and loss. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 27, ed. Kusumoto, Kiyomi, 65–77. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N., and Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, eds. 1995. The generic book. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On WH-movement. In Formal syntax, ed. Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas, and Akmajian, Adrian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, ed. Freiden, R., 417–454. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve. 1978. Locationals: Existential, locative and possessive constructions. In Universals of human language, ed. Greenberg, Joseph, 85–126. Stanford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den. 1995. Binding, expletives and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 26:347–354.Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22:1–25.Google Scholar
Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68:553–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groat, Erich M. 1995. English expletives: A minimalist approach. Linguistic Inquiry 26:354–365.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne, Hung, Henrietta, and Travis, Lisa. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10:375–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1988. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun, and Mulder, René. 1991. Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review 7:1–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoop, Helen de. 1992. Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hoop, Helen de. 1997. A semantic reanalysis of the partitive constraint. Lingua 103:151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1995. Quantification in Straits Salish. In Quantification in natural language, ed. Bach, Emmon, Jelinek, Eloise, Kratzer, Angelika, and Partee, Barbara H., 487–540. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1995. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1976. Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and topic, ed. Li, Charles N., 249–301. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1987. A semantic definition of “indefinite NP”. In The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. Reuland, Eric J. and Meulen, Alice G.B. ter, 286–317. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. In Press. Morphology is structure: A Malagasy test case. In Formal issues in Austronesian linguistics, ed. Paul, Ileana, Phillips, Vivianne, and Travis, Lisa, 27–47. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward, and Ralalaoherivony, Baholisoa. 1998. Raising from NP in Malagasy. In UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20: The structure of Malagasy, vol. 2, ed. Paul, Ileana, 65–93. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Case and expletives revisited: On Greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry 26:615–633.Google Scholar
Malzac, R.P. 1960. Grammaire malgache. Paris: Société d’Editions Géographiques, Maritimes et Coloniales.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Masanori. 1996. Economy of chain formation. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana. 1998. The parts of have. Paper read at the 1998 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana. In Press. Malagasy existentials: A syntactic account of specificity. In Formal issues in Austronesian linguistics, ed. Paul, Ileana, Phillips, Vivianne, and Travis, Lisa, 65–83. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Pearson, Matthew. 1996a. Pied-piping into the left periphery. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 27, ed. Kusumoto, Kiyomi, 321–335. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Pearson, Matthew. 1996b. Domain phrases and topic arguments in Malagasy existentials. In UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: The structure of Malagasy, vol. 1, ed. Pearson, Matthew and Paul, Ileana, 113–141. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pearson, Matthew. 1996c. Raising and restructuring in Malagasy existentials. Master’s thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pensalfini, Robert. 1995. Malagasy phrase structure and the LCA. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27: Papers on minimalist syntax, ed. Pensalfini, Robert and Ura, Hiroyuki, 209–221. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 1994. The existential construction in Malagasy. Paper read at the Seventh International Congress of Austronesian Linguistics, Leiden.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. On the inferencing of indefinite-this NPs. In Elements of discourse understanding, ed. Joshi, Aravind K., Webber, Bonnie L., and Sag, Ivan A., 231–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Razanamanana, Marie Jeanne. 1996. Multilingualism in daily life. In UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: The structure of Malagasy, vol. 1, ed. Pearson, Matthew and Paul, Ileana, 142–151. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Safir, Kenneth. 1982. Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Safir, Kenneth. 1987. What explains the Definiteness Effect? In The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. Reuland, Eric J. and Meulen, Alice G.B. ter, 71–97. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein. In Press. Icelandic expletive constructions and the distribution of subject types. In Subjects, expletives and the Extended Projection Principle, ed. Svenonious, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1984. There insertion. Linguistic Inquiry 15:131–153.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne, and Mbolatianavalona, Liliane. To appear. Towards a modular theory of linguistic deficiency: Evidence from Malagasy personal pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar
Zucchi, Alessandro. 1995. The ingredients of definiteness and the definiteness effect. Natural Language Semantics 3:33–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar