Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:25:08.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cycle Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Jurgen Klausenburger*
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bybee, Joan 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew 1987. Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Geisler, Hans 1982. Studien zur typologischen Entwicklung. Lateinisch-Altfranzosisch-Neufranzösisch. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph 1954. A Quantitative Approach to the Morphological Typology of Language. International Journal of American Linguistics. 26:178194.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, Jurgen 1991. On the Evolution of Latin Verbal Inflection into Romance: Change in Parameter Setting? Paper read at the 21st Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages, University of California/Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, Willi 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1977. Language Change in Childhood and in History. Pp. 185214 in Language Learning and Thought. Macnamara, John, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar