Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:00:45.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsecrating the Temple of Justice: Invocations of Civilization and Humanity in the Nuremberg Justice Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Christiane Wilke
Christiane Wilke
Affiliation:
Department of Law, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nuremberg Trials provide the foundation for contemporary international criminal law. Yet these trials are rarely explored in their broader ideational and social context. This article examines the context and role of the concept of “civilization” as used in U.S. v Altstoetter, the 1947 trial of Nazi judges and judicial administrators at Nuremberg. I place the reference to civilization in Altstoetter within a tradition of international law that understood law and civilization as co-constitutive. The Altstoetter Court conceptualized Germany as an essentially civilized country that lapsed into barbaric and therefore lawless violence. This account helped the Court to establish the blameworthiness of the defendants' conduct, blame the Nazi violence on lawlessness, and establish its own authority.

Résumé

Les procès de Nuremberg constituent le fondement du droit criminel international contemporain. Néanmoins, ces procès sont rarement étudiés dans un contexte social et conceptuel plus large. Cet article examine le contexte ainsi que le rôle du concept de «civilisation» tel qu'utilisé dans le cas de U.S. v. Altstoetter, c'est-à-dire le procès de 1947 des juges et administrateurs judiciaires nazis à Nuremberg. L'auteure place la référence au concept de «civilisation» telle qu'évoqué par Altstoetter au sein d'une tradition du droit international qui définit la loi et la civilisation comme étant «co-constitutives». La cour Altstoetter conceptualisait l'Allemagne comme un pays essentiellenient civilisé tombant dans une violence barbare et anarchique. Cette représentation aide la cour à établir la culpabilité des accusés, à blâmer la violence nazie sur l'absence de loi ainsi qu'à établir sa propre autorité.

Keywords

procès des juges à Nurembergdroit internationalcivilizationhumanitéNuremberg Justice Trialinternational lawcivilizationhumanity
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 181 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 U.S. v. Altstoetter et al. (The ‘Justice Case’), Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. 3 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1951), 31Google Scholar (prosecution opening statement) [Altstoetter]. In subsequent citations to this source, the document referenced is the court's judgment unless noted otherwise.

2 Ibid.

3 See Douglas, Lawrence, The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., 39.

5 Altstoetter at 22–3 (indictment).

6 See Pendas, Devin, “‘The Magical Scent of the Savage’: Colonial Violence, the Crisis of Civilization, and the Origins of the Legalist Paradigm of War,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 30 (2007), 29–52Google Scholar; Mazower, Mark, “An International Civilization? Empire, Internationalism and the Crisis of the Mid-twentieth Century,” International Affairs 82 (2006), 553–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See Mamdani, Mahmood, “Making Sense of Political Violence in Postcolonial Africa,” Identity Culture and Politics 3 (2002), 2Google Scholar.

8 Altstoetter at 32 (prosecution, opening statement).

9 Ibid. at 22–3 (indictment).

10 Ibid. at 33 (prosecution, opening statement).

11 Ibid. at 33 (prosecution, opening statement).

12 Pendas, , “Magical Scent of the Savage,” 52Google Scholar.

13 See Mégret, Frédéric, “From ‘Savages’ to ‘Unlawful Combatants’: A Postcolonial Look at International Humanitarian Law's ‘Other,’” in International Law and Its Others, ed. Orford, Anne (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 273Google Scholar.

14 See, e.g., Cawston, Robert, “Nuremberg and the Legacy of Law,” Open Democracy News Analysis, 21 November 2005, http://www.opendemocracy.net/node/3049/pdfGoogle Scholar; Teitel, Ruti, “For Humanity,” Journal of Human Rights 3 (2004), 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Declaration on German Atrocities, 1 November 1943 [Moscow Declaration]. Reprinted in Altstoetter at x.

16 See Müller, Ingo, Furchtbare Juristen: Die unbewältigte Vergangenheit unserer Justiz (Munich: Knaur, 1989), 146–58Google Scholar.

17 Altstoetter at 3.

18 Ibid. at 3–4.

19 Ostendorf, Heribert and Veen, Heino ter, Das “Nürnberger Juristenurteil”: Eine kommentierte Dokumentation (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1985)Google Scholar; Peschel-Gutzeit, Lore Maria, ed., Das Nürnberger Juristen-Urteil von 1947: Historischer Zusammenhang und aktuelle Bezüge (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996)Google Scholar.

20 See, e.g., Müller, , Furchtbare Juristen, 270–75Google Scholar.

21 See Lippman, Matthew, “The Prosecution of Josef Altstoetter et al.: Law, Lawyers, and Justice in the Third Reich,” Dickinson Journal of International Law 16 (1998), 343–433Google Scholar; Nathans, Eli, “Legal Order as Motive and Mask: Franz Schlegelberger and the Nazi Administration of Justice,” Law and History Review 18 (2000), 281–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 See Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Douzinas, Costas, Human Rights and Empire: The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (New York: Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar; Anghie, Antony, “The Evolution of International Law: Colonial and Postcolonial Realities,” Third World Quarterly 27 (2006), 739–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mégret, “From ‘Savages’ to ‘Unlawful Combatants.’”

23 Anghie, Antony, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 4–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951; reprint, New York: Harcourt Brace & Co., 1973), 123Google Scholar.

25 See Arendt, Hannah, “Personal Responsibility under Dictatorship,” in Responsibility and Judgment, ed. Kohn, Jerome (New York: Schocken, 2003), 44Google Scholar.

26 Bauman, Zygmunt, Modernity and the Holocaust (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

27 See Douglas, , Memory of Judgment, 65–89Google Scholar; Douglas, Lawrence, “The Shrunken Head of Buchenwald: Icons of Atrocity at Nuremberg,” Representations 63 (1998), 39–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 See Koskenniemi, Gentle Civilizer; Bowden, Brett, “The Ideal of Civilisation: Its Origins and Socio-political Context,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bowden, Brett, “Colonial Origins of International Law: European Expansion and the Classical Standard of Civilization,” Journal of the History of International Law 7 (2005), 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gong, Gerrit, The Standard of Civilization in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

29 Lorimer, James, The Institutes of the Law of Nations: A Treatise of the Jural Relations of Separate Political Communities (Edinburgh: Blackwood, 1883), 99, 98Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., 101.

31 Ibid., 93.

32 Koskenniemi, , Gentle Civilizer, 103Google Scholar.

33 Fitzpatrick, Peter, Modernism and the Grounds of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Gong, , Standard of Civilization, 14–15Google Scholar.

35 See Ruskola, Teemu, “Legal Orientalism,” Michigan Law Review 101 (2002), 179–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 See ibid.

37 Schwarzenberger, Georg, “The Standard of Civilisation in International Law,” Current Legal Problems (1955), 227Google Scholar.

38 Myles, Eric, “‘Humanity,’ ‘Civilization’ and the ‘International Community’ in the Late Imperial Russian Mirror: Three Ideas ‘Topical for Our Days,’” Journal of the History of International Law 4 (2002), 318CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 The term “civilization” appears in 270 articles published in the American Journal of International Law in the 30 years between 1918, the end of World War 1, and 1947, the year of the Nuremberg Trial of the Judges. In the first decade (1918–1927) the term appeared 95 times; in the second decade (1928–1937), 51 times; and in the last decade (1938–1947), it was at its most popular, mentioned in 124 articles.

40 Wright, Quincy, “Sovereignty of the Mandates,” American Journal of International Law 17 (1923), 691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Berdahl, Clarence A., “The Power of Recognition,” American Journal of International Law 14 (1920), 519–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Brown, Philip Marshall, “International Responsibility in Haiti and Santo Domingo” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 16 (1922), 433–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Thayer, Lucius Ellsworth, “The Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire and the Question of Their Abrogation as It Affects the United States,” American Journal of International Law 17 (1923), 207–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Sherman, Gordon, “Jus Gentium and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 12 (1918), 56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Brown, Philip Marshall, “War and Law” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 12 (1918), 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Rodriguez, Pedro Capo, “Colonial Representation in the American Empire,” American Journal of International Law 15 (1921), 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Brown, , “International Responsibility,” 434Google Scholar.

48 Ibid., 436.

49 Wright, “Sovereignty of the Mandates”; Wright, Quincy, “The Bombardment of Damascus,” American Journal of International Law 20 (1926), 263–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Colby, Elbridge, “How to Fight Savage Tribes,” American Journal of International Law 21 (1927), 279–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Thayer, “Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire”; Quigley, Harold Scott, “Extraterritoriality in China,” American Journal of International Law 20 (1926), 46–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sayre, Francis Bowes, “The Passing of Extraterritoriality in Siam,” American Journal of International Law 22 (1928), 70–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 See Quigley, “Extraterritoriality.”

52 Jessup, Philip C., “In Support of International Law,” American Journal of International Law 34 (1940), 505–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Brown, Philip Marshall, “Changing Concepts of International Law” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 34 (1940), 504CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Fenwick, C., “International Law and Lawless Nations” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 33 (1939), 743CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Ibid., 744.

56 Ibid., 746.

57 Hyde, Charles Cheney, “Law in War” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 36 (1942), 85–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Ibid., 86.

59 See Eagleton, Clyde, “Organization of the Community of Nations,” American Journal of International Law 36 (1942), 229–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woolsey, L.H., “A Pattern of World Order” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 36 (1942), 621–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 See, e.g., Manner, George, “The Legal Nature and Punishment of Criminal Acts of Violence Contrary to the Laws of War,” American Journal of International Law 37 (1943), 407–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eagleton, Clyde, “Punishment of War Criminals by the United Nations” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 37 (1943), 495–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wright, Quincy, “War Criminals,” American Journal of International Law 39 (1945), 257–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Wright, Quincy, “The End of Exterritoriality in China” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 37 (1943), 286–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Ibid., 288.

63 Declaration by the United Nations, January 1, 1942, Yale Avalon Project, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/decade03.asp.

64 Said, Edward, Orientalism (1978; reprint, New York: Vintage, 2003), 49Google Scholar.

65 Wright, Quincy, “The Law of the Nuremberg Trial,” American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Stowell, Ellery C., “Military Reprisals and the Sanctions of the Laws of War,” American Journal of International Law 36 (1942), 645CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Finch, George A., “The Progressive Development of International Law” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), 613–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Ibid., 614.

69 Brown, Philip Marshall, “World Law” (editorial comment), American Journal of International Law 40 (1946), 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Wright, , “Law of the Nuremberg Trial,” 72Google Scholar.

71 Jackson, Robert H., “Report to the President from Justice Robert H. Jackson, Chief Counsel for the United States in the Prosecution of Axis War Criminals,” American Journal of International Law 39, Supplement: Official Documents (1945), 183Google Scholar.

72 Ibid., 185.

73 Altstoetter at 31 (prosecution, opening statement).

74 Jackson, , “Report to the President,” 184Google Scholar.

75 See Ruskola, , “Legal Orientalism,” 194–95Google Scholar.

76 Fitzpatrick, , Modernism and the Grounds of Law, 128Google Scholar.

77 Altstoetter at 23, 20 (indictment), 92 (prosecution, opening statement).

78 Ibid. at 985.

79 Ibid. at 1024.

80 Ibid. at 1086.

81 See Cover, Robert, “Violence and the Word,” in Narrative, Violence, and the Law, ed. Minow, Martha, Ryan, Michael, and Sarat, Austin, 203–38 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

82 Altstoetter at 20 (indictment).

83 Ibid. at 960.

84 Finch, George, “The Nuremberg Trial and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 41 (1947), 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 Ibid.

86 Declaration by the United Nations, January 1, 1942.

87 This number includes signatures until March 1, 1945. The original declaration was signed by 26 states, including governments-in-exile and states that had not yet been recognized as independent states.

88 Altstoetter at 966.

89 Ibid. at 106 (prosecution, opening statement).

90 Fraenkel, Ernst, The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship (1938), trans. Shils, E.A. (New York: Octagon Books, 1969)Google Scholar.

91 Ibid., xvi, 3.

92 Ibid., 4–5.

93 Altstoetter at 41 (prosecution, opening statement).

94 Ibid. at 57 (prosecution, opening statement).

95 Douglas, , “Shrunken Head,” 46Google Scholar.

96 See Bass, Gary, Stay the Hand of Vengeance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Pendas, “Magical Scent of the Savage.”

97 Altstoetter at 106 (prosecution, opening statement).

98 For the importance of this observation see Mazower, “An International Civilization?” and Pendas, “Magical Scent of the Savage.”

99 Altstoetter at 966.

100 Robertson, Geoffrey, Crimes against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice (New York: New Press, 1999), 213–20Google Scholar.

101 Altstoetter at 75 (prosecution, opening statement).

102 Ibid. at 31 (prosecution, opening statement).

103 Ibid. at 985.

104 Ibid. at 977–78.

105 See Levy, Daniel and Sznajder, Natan, “The Institutionalization of Cosmopolitan Morality: The Holocaust and Human Rights,” Journal of Human Rights 3 (2004), 143–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

106 Fitzpatrick, , Modernism and the Grounds of Law, 128Google Scholar.

107 Ibid., 152.

108 Pendas, , “Magical Scent of the Savage,” 53Google Scholar.

109 See Gong, , Standard of Civilization, 98Google Scholar.

110 See Fidler, David, “International Human Rights Law in Practice: The Return of the Standard of Civilization,” Chicago Journal of International Law 2 (2001), 137–57Google Scholar; Donnelly, Jack, “Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?” International Affairs 74 (1998), 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111 The language of “civilization” in the IMT trials is analysed by Douglas, , Memory of Judgment, 80–89Google Scholar.

112 For an example of this omission see Teitel, , “For Humanity,” 226Google Scholar.

113 Derrida, Jacques, Specters of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International (New York: Routledge, 1994), 18Google Scholar.