Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:55:28.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prologue: Introduction to Sensori-Legal Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

David Howes Open the ORCID record for David Howes [Opens in a new window]
David Howes*
Affiliation:
Full Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology Concordia University Adjunct Professor Faculty of Law McGill [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 34 , Special Issue 2: Vers une déstabilisation du sensorium du droit: Étude de la jurisprudence des sens / Troubling Law’s Sensorium: Explorations in Sensational Jurisprudence , August 2019 , pp. 173 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association / Association Canadienne Droit et Société 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research on which the articles by Charlene Elliott, Christiane Wilke, and Sheryl Hamilton, as well as this introduction, are based was funded by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC no. 435-2015-1416). “The Othered Senses” workshop, at which all of the above articles, as well as the articles by Sean Mulcahy, Safiyah Rochelle, Mike Mopas, and John Shiga were first presented as papers, was funded in large part by a Connection grant from the SSHRC (no. 611-2017-0300. On behalf of my fellow contributors, I wish to thank the editors of the CJLS/RCDS, Eric Reiter and Marie-Eve Sylvestre, and the legion of anonymous reviewers, for their many helpful comments on earlier drafts of our papers. For my part, I wish to thank Constance Classen and Sheryl Hamilton for helping me attune my thinking to the life of the senses in law.

References

Adams, Wendy. 2010. “I Made a Promise to a Lady”: Critical Legal Pluralism as Improvised Law in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Critical Studies in Improvisation 6 (on-line). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1635612 / 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 1990. Blind Rape Victim Picks Suspect by His Cologne, Feel of Hands. The Seattle Times, 16 January.Google Scholar
Bentley, Lionel, and Flynn, Leo, eds. 1996. Law and the Senses: Sensational Jurisprudence . London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Biddle, Jennifer. 2016. Remote Avant Garde: Aboriginal Art under Occupation. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouclin, Suzanne. Engageant des techniques cinélégales pour mieux sentir la règlementation des personnes en situation d’itinérance. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 34 (2): 227–241.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 2009. Material Law: A Jurisprudence of What’s Real. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Michael, Gilroy, Paul, Howes, David, and Kahn, Douglas. 2006. Introducing Sensory Studies. The Senses and Society 1 (1): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre for Sensory Studies. 2018. The Othered Senses: Law Regulation Sensorium. Accessed at: http://lawandthesenses.org/the-othered-senses-workshop/ 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. 1997. Foundations for an Anthropology of the Senses. International Social Science Journal 153: 401–12.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance. 2001. The Senses. In Encyclopedia of European Social History, vol. IV, ed. Stearns, Peter, 353–63. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance, ed. 2014. A Cultural History of the Senses, 6 vols. London: BloomsburyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, Constance, Howes, David, and Synnott, Anthony. 1994. Aroma: The Cultural History of Smell. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Leif, ed. 2012. Visualizing Law and Authority: Essays on Legal Aesthetics. The Hague: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. 1997. 3 Supreme Court Reports 1010.Google Scholar
Dery, George M. 1994. The Uncertain Reach of the Plain Touch Doctrine: An Examination of Minnesota v. Dickerson and Its Impact on Current Fourth Amendment Law and Daily Police Practice. American Journal of Criminal Law 21 (3): 385–406.Google Scholar
Desjarlais, Robert. 1997. Shelter Blues: Sanity and Selfhood among the Homeless . Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, Costas, and Nead, Lynda, eds. 1999. Law and the Image: The Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Craig. 2018. Constitution: Performance Evidence in Aboriginal Land Claims. In A Cultural History of Law in the Modern Age, ed. Sherwin, R. K. and Celermajer, D., 41–62. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gialdroni, S. 2018. Justice Petrified: The Seat of the Italian Supreme Court between Law, Architecture and Iconography. In Sensing the Nation’s Law: Historical Inquiries into the Aesthetics of Democratic Legitimacy, ed. Huygebaert, S., Condello, A., Marusek, S., and Antaki, M., 117–52. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Sheryl. 2019. Hands in Cont(r)act: The Resiliency of Business Handshakes in Pandemic Culture. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 34 (2): 343–360.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Sheryl. 2009. Impersonations: Troubling the Person in Law and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Sheryl. 2017. Sensing Law: Introduction. In Sensing Law, ed. Hamilton, S., Majury, D, Moore, D., Sargent, N., and Wilke, C., 1–30. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Sheryl, Majury, Diana, Moore, Dawn, Sargent, Neil, and Wilke, Christiane, eds. 2017. Sensing Law. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hertz, Robert. 1973. The Preeminence of the Right Hand. In Right and Left, ed. Needham, R., 3–31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hibbits, Bernard J. 1992. Coming to Our Senses: Communication and Legal Expression in Performance Cultures. Emory Law Journal 41:873–960.Google Scholar
Hibbits, Bernard J. 1994. Making Sense of Metaphors: Visuality, Aurality, and the Reconfiguration of American Legal Discourse. Cardozo Law Review 16:229–356.Google Scholar
Howes, David. 2005a. Introduction: Culture in the Domains of Law. In “Cross-Cultural Jurisprudence,” ed. Howes, David, special issue, Canadian Journal of Law and Society/ Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 20 (1): 9–29.Google Scholar
Howes, David. 2005b. Hyperaesthesia, or, The Sensual Logic of Late Capitalism. In Empire of the Senses, ed. Howes, D., 282–303. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Howes, David. 2006. Charting the Sensorial Revolution. The Senses and Society 1 (1): 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, David. 2016. Sensing Cultures: Cinema, Ethnography and the Senses. In Beyond Text? Critical. Practices and Sensory Anthropology, ed. Cox, R. et al, 165–80. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Howes, David. 2017. Law’s Sensorium. In Sensing Law, ed. Hamilton, S., Majury, D., Moore, D., Sargent, N., and Wilke, C., 53–72. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howes, David, ed. 2018. Senses and Sensation: Critical and Primary Sources, 4 vols. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Howes, David, and Classen, Constance. 2014. Ways of Sensing: Understanding the Senses in Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1996. Governance of the Consuming Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huygebaert, Stefan, Condello, Angela, Marusek, Sarah, and Antaki, Mark, eds. 2018. Sensing the Nation’s Law: Historical Inquiries into the Aesthetics of Democratic Legitimacy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Roundtable for the Semiotics of Law. 2015. Synaesthetic Legalities: Sensory Dimensions of Law and Jurisprudence. Accessed at: http://www.sensorystudies.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Synesthetic-Legalities-CFP.pdf 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Jacob, J. I. H. 1987. The Fabric of English Civil Law. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1999. Must Justice Be Blind? The Challenge of Images to the Law. In Law and the Image: The Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law, ed. Douzinas, C. and Nead, L., 19– 35. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kilburn, Jessye. 2018. A Lawyer and a Lady?: The Visual Aesthetics of Femininity and Professionalism in Law. http://lawandthesenses.org/probes/ (accessed 1 June 2019).Google Scholar
Kleinhans, Martha, and Macdonald, Roderick. 1997. What is a Critical Legal Pluralism? Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 12 (2): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, Roderick. 2002. Lessons of Everyday Law. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Manderson, Desmond. 2000. Songs Without Music: Aesthetic Dimensions of Law and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Manderson, Desmond, ed. 2018. Law and the Visual: Representation, Technology, Critique. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusek, Sarah, ed. 2017. Synesthetic Legalities: Sensory Dimensions of Law and Jurisprudence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1954. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. I. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1987. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Masco, Joseph. 2004. Nuclear Technoaesthetics: Sensory Politics from Trinity to the Virtual Bomb in Los Alamos. American Ethnologist 31 (3): 349–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Antonia. 1994. Eagle Down Is Our Law: Witsuwit’en Law, Feasts and Land Claims. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Charles C. 1908. Facts on the Weight and Value of Evidence. Northport, Long Island NY: Edward Thompson Company.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, Linda. 2012. Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process, and the Place of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, Sean. 2019. Silence and Attunement in Legal Performance. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 34 (2): 191–207.Google Scholar
Parker, James E. 2015. Acoustic Jurisprudence: Listening to the Trial of Simon Bikindi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, Joy. 2010. Sensing Changes: Technologies, Environments and the Everyday, 1953–2003. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Princeton University. 2016. Synesthesia of Law Conference. Accessed at: http://synesthesia.princeton.edu/ 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison. 2014. The Tension Between Religious Freedom and Noise Law: The Call to Prayer in a Multicultural Society. In Religion and the Discourse of Human Rights, ed. Dagan, H., Lifshitz, S., and Stern, Y. Z., 375–411. Israel: The Israel Democracy Institute.Google Scholar
Rochelle, Safiyah. Encountering the “Muslim”: Guantánamo Bay, Detainees, and Apprehensions of Violence. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 34 (2): 209–225.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas, eds. 1998. Law in the Domains of Culture. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sculthorpe, Alexander. 2014. A Courtroom with a View. Accessed at: http://centreforsensorystudies.org/occasional-papers/a-courtroom-with-a-view-when-a-justice-system-senses-for-itself/ 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Serres, Michel. 2016. The Five Senses. A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard K. 2011. Visualizing Law in the Age of the Digital Baroque: Arabesques & Entanglements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shiga, John. The Nuclear Sensorium: Cold War Nuclear Imperialism and Sensory Violence. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 34 (2): 281–306.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 1992. Making a Place for a Cultural Analysis of Law. Law and Social Inquiry 17:39–62.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark M. 2007. Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting and Touching in History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stoller, Paul. 1997. Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Technology Sydney. 2015. Architecture, Law and the Senses Symposium. Accessed at: https://www.lawlithum.org/cfp-architecture-law-and-the-senses-symposium/ 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2011. Seeing Like a City: The Dialectic of Modern and Premodern Ways of Seeing in Urban Governance. Law and Society Review 45 (2): 277–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oosten, F. F. W. 1987. Police Dogs, Criminal Odors and the Law of Evidence. South African Law Journal 104:531–57.Google Scholar
Westminster Law and Theory Centre. 2013. Law and the Senses Conference. Accessed at: http://nonliquetlaw.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/law-and-the-senses_booklet.pdf 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Wagner, Anne, and Sherwin, Richard K., eds. 2014. Law, Culture and Visual Studies. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walfish, Simcha. 2018. Solitary Confinement and the Senses. Accessed at: http://lawandthesenses.org/probes/solitary-confinement-and-the-senses/ 1 June 2019.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2010. Experience, Evidence and Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, Christiane. High Altitude Legality: Visuality and Jurisdiction in the Adjudication of NATO Air Strikes. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 34 (2): 261–280.Google Scholar