Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:29:05.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Penny Darbyshire Sitting in Judgment. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011. 478 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2013

Richard Devlin
Richard Devlin*
Affiliation:
University of Research Professor Schulich School of Law Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews / Compte rendus
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 28 , Special Issue 2: Gender Equality, Legal Mobilization, and Feminism in a Multilevel European System , August 2013 , pp. 280 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association / Association Canadienne Droit et Société 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Her criticisms of her research subjects are few. Her one major objection, which she makes several times, is about gender representation: “[T]he composition of the judiciary remains an international embarrassment” (p. 447). Her other criticisms include the unresponsiveness of judges to the needs of jurors (p. 208); a relative ignorance of procedures and practices in other common law jurisdictions (pp. 221–25); the residue of hierarchy; and the snobbery of judges who were formerly solicitors or barristers.