Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:02:24.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Rights Commissions in Canada: Reform or Reinvention in a Time of Restraint?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

David Johnson  and
R. Brian Howe
David Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University College of Cape Breton
R. Brian Howe
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University College of Cape Breton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses current tensions and initiatives respecting the manner by which provincial human rights commissions are confronting the pressures of financial restraint. It also focuses attention on theoretical debates respecting the reform or reinvention of governmental bodies. As such agencies are forced to do more with less, we can witness them engaging in an important process of institutional and administrative reconfiguration. This process is significant, touching on matters ranging from case prioritisation, through adjudication, to agency responsibilities regarding public education. The process of change, however, is to be understood more in light of the literature on the reform of government rather than its reinvention. And as all these agencies confront the need to engage in the reform of their services, questions arise regarding the degree to which such reform is subject to public awareness and scrutiny.

Résumé

Cet article traite des difficultés engendrées par les restrictions bugétaires avec lesquelles les commissions provinciales des droits de la personne doivent composer et les solutions qu'elles se proposent d'adopter pour y faire face. On y traite également des débats théoriques sur la réforme ou la réinvention des organismes gouvernementaux. En effet, ces organismes devant répondre à des besoins de plus en plus pressants, et disposant de moins en moins de ressources, on assiste à un processus de reconfiguration institutionnelle et administrative. Ce processus touche un grand nombre d'aspects, de l'établissement de priorité des causes et le traitement de celles-ci au devoir d'éducation du public. Toutefois, cette évolution participe davantage d'une réforme du gouvernement que d'une réinvention. Ces organismes devant faire face à la necessité de réaménager leurs services, la question demeure de savoir dans quelles limites le public doit participer à cette réforme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring/printemps 1997 , pp. 1 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nine provinces possess human rights commissions; British Columbia has a human rights council. Throughout this paper the general plural form that will be used in reference to all such bodies will be “commissions” or “agencies.”

2. See for example Cairns, Alan, “The Embedded State: State-Society Relations in Canada” in Banting, Keith, State and Society: Canada in Comparative Perspective (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Russell, Peter H., “The Political Purposes of the Charter: Have They Been Fulfilled? An Agnostic's Report Card” in Bryden, Philip, Davis, Steven & Russell, John, eds., Protecting Rights and Freedoms (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Mandel, Michael, The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada (Toronto: Wall & Thompson, 1989)Google Scholar; Bogart, W. A., Courts and Country: The Limits of Litigation and the Social and Political Life of Canada (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

3. Cairns, ibid.; Cairns, Alan, Charter Versus Federalism: The Dilemmas of Constitutional Reform (Montreal & Kingston: McGill–Queen's University Press, 1992) c. 2–3Google Scholar.

4. Osborne, David & Gaebler, Ted, Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector from Schoolhouse to State House, City Hall to Pentagon (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1992)Google Scholar; Borins, Sandford, “The New Public Management is Here to Stay” (1995) 38:1Canadian Public Administration 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Purchase, Bryne & Hirshhorn, Ronald, Searching for Good Governance (Kingston: School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, 1994)Google Scholar.

5. Savoie, Donald J., “What Is Wrong with the New Public Management?” in (1995) 38:1Canadian Public Administration 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trebilcock, Michael J., The Prospects for Reinventing Government (Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute, 1994)Google Scholar; Thomas, Paul G., “Coping with Change: How Public and Private Organizations Read and Respond to Turbulent External Environments” in Seidle, F. Leslie, ed., Rethinking Government: Reform or Reinvention? (Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1993)Google Scholar.

6. A significant amount of information for this article was obtained through personal interviews with various senior officials from each provincial human rights agency. All interviewees were guaranteed anonymity. That we focused on provincial commissions was based upon their similarity of mandate and organization, thus allowing for comparison and generalization. The schedule of interviews was as follows: Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, St. John's (1 September 1995); Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, Charlottetown (17 August 1995); Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Halifax (4 August 1995); New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Fredericton (14 August 1995); Quebec Human Rights Commission, Montreal 30 August 1995); Ontario Human Rights Commission, Toronto 12 June 1995); Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Winnipeg (15 May 1995); Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Saskatoon (17 May 1995); Alberta Human Rights Commission, Edmonton (19 May 1995); British Columbia Human Rights Council, Victoria (24 May 1995).

7. Osborne & Gaebler, supra note 4 at 25.

8. Ibid. at 16–20.

9. Borins, supra note 4 at 122–23.

10. Purchase & Hirshhorn, supra note 4 at 43.

11. Ibid. at 46–54.

12. See, for example, Drucker, Peter F., “Really Reinventing Government” (1995) 275: 2The Atlantic Monthly 52Google Scholar.

13. Savoie, supra note 5 at 114–19.

14. Trebilcock, supra note 5 at 6.

15. Cairns, supra note 2

16. Trebilcock, supra note 5 at 68–73.

17. Thomas, supra note 5 at 55.

18. Ibid.

19. Ibid. at 57.

20. Ibid. at 57–58.

21. Tarnopolsky, Walter & Pentney, William, Discrimination and the Law (Toronto: Carswell, 1994) c. 2Google Scholar.

22. Howe, R. Brian & Johnson, David, “Variations in Enforcing Equality: A Study of Provincial Human Rights Funding” (1995) 38:2Canadian Public Administration 242CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23. Ibid. at 244–49.

24. This table has been previously published and analyzed, Ibid. at 251.

25. Interviews with British Columbia Human Rights Council, Alberta Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission.

26. Interviews, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission.

27. Interviews, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council.

28. Interviews, Ontario Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission. See also Ontario Human Rights Code Review Task Force, Achieving Equality: A Report on Human Rights Reform, (Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Citizenship, 1992)Google Scholar [the Cornish Report] at 20–22, 46; Ontario Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1995–1996 (Toronto: Queen's Printer, 1996) at 1Google Scholar.

29. Howe, R. Brian & Andrade, Malcolm, “The Reputations of Human Rights Commissions in Canada” (1994) 9:2C.J.L.S. 1 at 2, 10–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30. Interviews, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission.

31. Crawford, Michael G., “Human Rights Commissions: Politically Correct Predators?” (1991) 15:7Can. Law 16Google Scholar.

32. Interviews, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission. See also New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1992–1993 (Frederiction: Queen's Printer, 1993) at 7–8Google Scholar; Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1992 (Winnipeg: Queen's Printer, 1992) at 1–2Google Scholar.

33. Tamopolsky & Pentney, supra note 21 at 15-8.10 – 15-24.

34. Interview, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.

35. Interview, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission.

36. Interview, Manitoba Human Rights Commission.

37. Interviews, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission. See also Quebec Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1994 (Quebec: Government of Quebec, 1994) at 18–23, 40–43Google Scholar; Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1992 (Saskatoon: Queen's Printer, 1992) at 5–16Google Scholar.

38. Interviews, Alberta Human Rights Commission, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission. See also Alberta Community Development, Our Commitment to Human Rights, (Edmonton: Government of Alberta, 1995) at 21–22Google Scholar; Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1993 (St. John's: Queen's Printer, 1993) at 6–7Google Scholar.

39. Personal Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council.

40. Tarnopolsky, Walter S., “The Iron Hand in the Velvet Glove: Administration and Enforcement of Human Rights Legislation in Canada” (1968) 46 Can.Bar Rev. 565Google Scholar.

41. Interview, Ontario Human Rights Commission.

42. Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.

43. Interviews, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council. See also Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1993 (Winnipeg: Queen's Printer, 1993) at 1–2Google Scholar; British Columbia Council of Human Rights, Annual Report 1991–1992 (Victoria: Queen's Printer, 1992) at 9–12Google Scholar.

44. Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978) at 88–90Google Scholar.

45. Interviews, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission.

46. Howe & Andrade, supra note 29 at 12–14.

47. Interviews, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council. See also Ontario Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1995–1996 (Toronto: Queen's Printer, 1996) at 8–9Google Scholar; Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1995 (Halifax: Queen's Printer, 1995) at 9Google Scholar; Alberta Community Development, supra note 38 at 9; McEvoy, John & Passaris, Constantine, eds., Human Rights in New Brunswick: A New Vision for a New Century (Fredericton: Queen's Printer, 1993) at 119–20Google Scholar [hereinafter Human Rights in New Brunswick].

48. Interview, Quebec Human Rights Commission.

49. Interview, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.

50. Interview, Ontario Human Rights Commission.

51. Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission.

52. Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission. Alberta Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council.

53. Interview, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission. See also Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1993 (Charlottetown: Queen's Printer, 1993) at 13–15Google Scholar.

54. Interviews, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission.

55. Interview, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission.

56. Interviews, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission.

57. Interviews with Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission.

58. Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, S.Q., 1989, c. 51, ss. 62, 101, 106, 110, 114–24Google Scholar.

59. Interview, Quebec Human Rights Commission. See also Quebec Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 1992 (Quebec: Government of Quebec, 1992) at c. 3Google Scholar.

60. Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.

61. Interview, Ontario Human Rights Commission.

62. Alberta Community Development, supra note 38 at 9–10.

63. Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission. See also Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, supra note 38 at 8–11; Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, supra note 47 at 30.

64. Interviews, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council. See also Ontario Human Rights Commission, supra note 28 at 31; New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, supra note 32 at 19–22; Manitoba Human Rights Commission, supra note 32 at 12–13.

65. Interviews, Alberta Human Rights Commission, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.

66. Interview, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission. See also Human Rights in New Brunswick, supra note 47 at 119.

67. Interviews, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.

68. Interview, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.

69. Interview, Quebec Human Rights Commission. See also Quebec Human Rights Commission, supra note 37 at 59–65.

70. Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council.

71. Interviews, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission. See also Manitoba Human Rights Commission, supra note 32 at 12; Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, supra note 47 at 34, 41–42; Ontario Human Rights Commission, supra note 28 at 9–11.

72. Interviews, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.

73. Interview, Ontario Human Rights Commission. See also Ontario Human Rights Code Review Task Force, supra note 28 at 27, 47–49.

74. Interviews, British Columbia Human Rights Council, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission. See also Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, supra note 37 at 14; New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, supra note 32 at 22.

75. Interview, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.

76. Interviews, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission.

77. Interviews, Newfoundland Human Rights Commission, Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Quebec Human Rights Commission, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Alberta Human Rights Commission, British Columbia Human Rights Council.