Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:29:11.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Rights Litigation as a Form of Transformative Feminist Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Judy Fudge
Judy Fudge
Affiliation:
Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes critiques/Review Essays
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Printemps/spring 1992 , pp. 153 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bartholomew, Amy and Hunt, Alan, “What's Wrong with Rights” (1990) 9 Law and Inequality at 1Google Scholar; Glasbeek, H. J., “A No-Frills Look at the Charter of Rights and Freedoms or How Politicians and Lawyers Hide Reality” (1989) 9 The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice at 293Google Scholar; Fudge, Judy, “The Effect of Entrenching a Bill of Rights upon Political Discourse: Feminist Demands and Sexual Violence in Canada” (1989) 17 International Journal of Sociology at 445Google Scholar; Mandel, Michael, The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics (Toronto: Wall and Thompson, 1989)Google Scholar.

2. Herman, Didi, “Are We Family?: Lesbian Rights and Women's Liberation” (1990) 28 Osgoode Hall Law Journal at 789Google Scholar; Williams, P.J., “Alchemical Notes: Reconstructing Ideals from Deconstructed Rights” (1987) 22 Harv. C.R.-C.L. at 401Google Scholar; Schneider, E., “The Dialectic of Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women's Movement” (1986) 61 N.Y.U.L. Rev. at 589Google Scholar; Bartholomew, Amy and Hunt, Alan, “What's Wrong with Rights” (1990) 9 Law and Inequality at 1Google Scholar.

3. Schneider, supra, note 2 at 622-23; Razack quotes this passage at 130–31.

4. Fudge, Judy, “The Public/Private Distinction: The Possibilities of and the Limits to the Use of Charter Litigation to Further Feminist Struggles” (1987) Osgoode Hall Law Journal at 485Google Scholar.

5. Glasbeek, supra, note 1.

6. Re: Tomen and Federation of Women Teachers Association of Ontario (1987), 66 D.L.R. (4th) 565 (Ont. C.A.)Google Scholar.

7. Brooks, Allen, Dixon v. Canada Safeway (1989) 89 C.L.L.C. 17, 012 (S.C.C.); [1989], 1 S.C.R. 1219.

8. R. v. Schacter (1990), 90 C.L.L.C. 14, 005 (F.C.A.)

9. Razack reports that in November 1988 Attorney General of Ontario Ian Scott told his audience that the recent modifications to the spouse-in-the-house rule which were introduced as a result of a Legal Charter challenge had cost taxpayers $80 million. He added: “I've got to give consideration to cancelling the whole welfare program for those women. That way there won't be any discrimination because there won't be any benefit given” (p. 130).

10. Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143.

11. Janzen/Govereauv. Platy Enterprises (1989), 89 C.L.L.C. 17, 011.

12. R. v. Morgentaler, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30.

13. Herman, supra, note 2; Bartholomew and Hunt, supra, note 1; Schneider, supra, note 2.

14. Smart, Carol, Feminism and the Power of the Law (London: Routledge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.