Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:32:59.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medical Malpractice: A Challenge to Alternative Dispute Resolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Chester N. Mitchell  and
Shona McDiarmid
Chester N. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Law, Carleton University
Shona McDiarmid
Affiliation:
Ottawa Law Review
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ideally, medical malpractice actions should deter medical negligence and compensate victims in a manner that is fair, speedy, cost-effective and accessible. Tort critics, however, argue that tort law in general and malpractice actions in particular do not match this ideal. But there is considerable debate about whether the identified faults are inherent or optional in tort adjudication. Those who believe adjudication itself is faulty propose alternative strategies including no-fault compensation schemes, public law prosecution and arbitration. In the paper's first section we consider whether the performance of the traditional adversarial system of dispute resolution in medical malpractice cases is inadequate. Arbitration's effectiveness as an alternative to litigation is then evaluated with reference to three arbitration models employed in the United States. We conclude that arbitration reforms offer distinct advantages but are no panacea for some basic justice problems that stem from political, legal and economic power imbalances between physicians and their clients.

Type
Comments/Commentaires
Information
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 3 , 1988 , pp. 227 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Sugarman, S., “Doing Away With Tort Law,” California Law Review 73 (1985), 555CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. See Hutchinson, A., “Beyond No-Fault,” California Law Review 73 (1985), 755CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fletcher, G., “Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory,” Harvard Law Review 85 (1972), 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Posner, R., “The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication,” Hofstra Law Review 8 (1980), 487Google Scholar.

3. There is heated debate, at least in the U.S., on whether the term “patient” should be replaced with the term “client.” For the reasons ably presented in Haber, J., “Patients, Agents and Informed Consent,” Journal of Law and Health 1 (1986), 43Google Scholar, we agree that patient should be dropped as quickly as possible. Since a transition period is unavoidable we will use both “patient” and “client” in this article with an emphasis on the latter.

4. Harrington, C.B., Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1985), 16Google Scholar.

5. Brown, K.L., Medical Problems and the Law (Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1971)Google Scholar.

6. Nelson, L., “Medical Malpractice and the Transformation in Health Care Delivery,” Cumberland Law Review 17 (1987), 313, 314Google Scholar.

7. Lash, S.H., “Arbitration of Medical Malpractice Disputes as a Response to the Medical Malpractice Crisis: Panacea or Pandora's Box for Insurers,” Insurance Counsel Journal (1979), 102Google Scholar. Canadian authors are tentative in labelling the Canadian situation a crisis but do refer to sharp increases in the number of cases. See, Sharpe, G.S., “Alternatives to the Court Process for Resolving Medical Malpractice Claims,” McGill Law Journal 26 (1981), 1036Google Scholar.

8. No statistical evidence exists for the litigation crisis and medical malpractice litigation is not increasing faster than general civil litigation. See, Sepler, H.J., “Professional Malpractice Litigation Crisis: Danger or Distortion,” Forum 15 (1979–1980), 493, 497, 505Google Scholar.

9. Ibid., 500.

10. In 1982 there were nine successful malpractice suits in Canada according to the CMPA statistics. See Picard, E.I., Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals in Canada (Toronto: Carswell, 1984), 347Google Scholar.

11. Wolfe, B., “Measuring Disability and Health,” Journal of Health Economics 3 (1984), 187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

12. See Wildavsky, A., “Doing Better and Feeling Worse: The Political Pathology of Health Policy,” in Knowles, J. (ed.), Doing Better and Feeling Worse: Health in the United States (New York: W.W. Norton, 1977), 105 andGoogle Scholar; Eisenberg, L., “The Search for a Cure,” 235 in Knowles, J. (ed.), Doing Better and Feeling WorseGoogle Scholar; Raymond, J., “Medicine as Patriarchal Religion,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1982), 197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Diehr, et al. , “Increased Access to Medical Care—The Impact on Health,” Medical Care 17 (1979), 989CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

13. Galanter, M., “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (And Think We Know) About our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” UCLA Law Review 31 (1983), 4, 7Google Scholar.

14. Nelson, , “Medical Malpractice,” 314Google Scholar.

15. Galanter, M., “When Legal Worlds Collide: Reflections on Bhopal, the Good Lawyer, and the American Law School,” Journal of Legal Education 36 (1986), 292, 296–298Google Scholar.

16. Galanter, , “Reading the Landscape of Disputes,” 68–71Google Scholar.

17. Robinson, G., “The Medical Malpractice Crisis of the 1970's: A Retrospective,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 5 at 14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Saks, M J., “In Search of the Lawsuit Crisis,” Law, Medicine And Health Care 14 (1986), 77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. A study by California Medical and Hospital Associations conducted to determine the number of iatrogenic injuries that would be compensated under a no-fault system, identified potentially compensable events in 4.65% of all inpatients. See, Zuckerman, S., Roller, C. and Bovbjerg, R., “Information on Malpractice: A Review of Empirical Research on Major Policy Issues,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 85 at 94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

18. Keaton, R., “Compensation for Medical Accidents,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121 (1972–1973), 590 at 592Google Scholar.

19. Mendelsohn, R., Confessions of a Medical Heretic (New York: Warner Books, 1979)Google Scholar; Lorea, G., The Hidden Malpractice (New York: William and Morrow, 1978)Google Scholar; Mendelsohn, R., Malepractice (1980)Google Scholar; Dreifus, C. (ed.), Seizing Our Bodies--The Politics of Women's Health (New York: Vintage Books, 1978)Google Scholar.

20. Danzon, P. and Lillard, L., “Settlement Out of Court: The Disposition of Medical Malpractice Claims,” Journal of Legal Studies 12 (1983), 345 at 347Google Scholar.

21. Buntaine, D., “The Price of Health Care Availability: The Economics of Medical Malpractice,” Southwestern University Law Review 11 (1979), 1371 at 1383Google Scholar.

22. MacAlister, J. and Scanlon, A., “Health Claims Arbitration in Maryland: The Experiment has Failed,” University of Baltimore Law Review 14 (1984–1985), 481 at 485Google Scholar.

23. The near impossibility of pursuing a claim in Canada is discussed in Sharpe, “Alternatives to the Court Process,” at 1044. A further obstacle in Canada is that nearly all physicians are represented by the CMPA whose policy is not to settle out of court unless there is unquestionable evidence of serious negligence and the claim is judged not to be excessive. See Picard, , Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals, 348Google Scholar.

24. Buntaine, , “The Price of Health Care Availability,” 1386Google Scholar.

25. Trubeck, D. et al. , “The Costs of Ordinary Litigation,” UCLA Law Review 31 (1983), 72 at 111Google Scholar.

26. “The Malpractice Blues,” Time (February 24, 1986), 66Google Scholar.

27. Picard, , Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals, 348Google Scholar.

28. Law, S., “A Consumer's Perspective on Medical Malpractice,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 305 at 308CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Posner, R., “Trends in Medical Malpractice Insurance 1970-85,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 37 at 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30. Havighurst, C., “Private Reform of Tort-Law Dogma: Market Opportunities and Legal Obstacles,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 123 at 127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

31. Zuckerman, , “Information on Malpractice,” 93Google Scholar.

32. Comment, , “An Analysis of State Legislative Responses to the Medical Malpractice Crisis,” Duke Law Journal 6 (1975), 1417 at 1455Google Scholar; Buntaine, , “The Price of Health Care Availability,” 1386Google Scholar.

33. Robinson, G., “Rethinking the Allocation of Medical Malpractice Risks between Patients and Providers,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 173 at 177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

34. Mitchell, C., Review of Sharpe, G., “The Law and Medicine in Canada,” Ottawa Law Review 19 (1987), 517Google Scholar.

35. Robinson, , “Rethinking the Allocation of Medical Malpractice Risks,” 178Google Scholar.

36. (1981), 31 O.R. (2d) 384, 15 C.C.L.T. 73 (H.C.).

37. Robinson, , “The Medical Malpractice Crisis of the 1970's,” 16Google Scholar. The Canadian standard of care is outlined in Crits v. Sylvester, [1956] C.R. 991, 5 D.L.R. (2d) 601. See also, Marshall, T., The Physician and Canadian Law (Toronto: Carswell, 1979), 54Google Scholar.

38. Robinson, , “The Medical Malpractice Crisis of the 1970's,” 16Google Scholar.

39. Picard, , Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals, 177Google Scholar.

40. Reibl v. Hughes, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880, 114 D.L.R. (3d) 1.

41. Buchan v. Ortho Pharmaceutical (1986), 35 C.C.L.T. 1 (Ont C.A.).

42. Sharpe, G.S., The Law and Medicine in Canada (Toronto: Butterworths, 1987), 203–208Google Scholar.

43. Kelner, J., “The Silent Doctors–The Conspiracy of Silence,” University of Richmond Law Review 5 (1970), 119Google Scholar.

44. Oath of Hippocrates. See Picard, , Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals, 7Google Scholar.

45. Kelner, , “The Silent Doctors,” 125Google Scholar.

46. See Hamowy, R., Canadian Medicine, A Study in Restricted Entry (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1984)Google Scholar.

47. Brook, R., Bructoco, R., Williams, H., “The Relationship Between Medical Malpractice and Quality of Care,” Duke Law Journal 6 (1975), 1197 at 1221Google Scholar.

48. Ibid.

49. Mechanic, D., “Some Social Aspects of the Medical Malpractice Dilemma,” Duke Law Journal 6 (1975), 1179 at 1195Google Scholar.

50. Ibid., 1180.

51. Zuckerman, , “Information on Malpractice,” 87Google Scholar. See also McLeary, R., “One Life--One Physician,” A Report to the Centre for Study of Responsive Law (Washington: Public Affairs Press, 1971), 78Google Scholar.

52. The U.S. jurisdictions with higher rates of malpractice claims also had the most active disciplinary boards. See Danzon, P., “The Frequency and Severity of Medical Malpractice Claims: New Evidence,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 57 at 69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

53. Health Discipline Act, R.S.O. 1980, c. 196, s. 12. For a case of suspension see: Re: Ringrose and College of Physicians of Alberta (No. 2), [1978] 2 W.W.R. 534.

54. Hamulka v. Golfman, [1985] 4 W.W.R. 66 (Man. Q.B.).

55. Buntaine, , “The Price of Health Care Availability,” 1384Google Scholar; Brook, , “The Relationship Between Medical Malpractice and Quality of Care,” 1216Google Scholar.

56. Friedman, G., “Medical Malpractice Arbitration: Time for a Model Act,” Rutgers Law Review 33 (1980–1981), 454 at 454Google Scholar; Comment, Case, “Mandatory State Malpractice Arbitration Boards and the Erie Problem: Edebon v. Soricelli,” Harvard Law Review 93 (1979–1980), 1562Google Scholar; Ehrhardt, C., “One Thousand Seven Hundred Days: A History of Medical Malpractice Mediation Panels in Florida,” Florida State University Law Review (1980), 165 at 166Google Scholar.

57. This figure refers to the portion of gross pre-tax income. See Posner, , “Trends in Medical Malpractice Insurance,” 50Google Scholar.

58. “Decline in patient-MD goodwill cited as malpractice suits rise,” The Globe and Mail, Toronto (May 29, 1987), A10Google Scholar; Picard, , Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals, 348Google Scholar.

59. Stamler, S., “Proposed Legislation: Amend MICRA to Include Mandatory Mediation of Medical Malpractice Claims,” University of San Fransico Law Review 14 (1980), 439Google Scholar.

60. Berkman, R., “Alternatives to Medical Malpractice Litigation, Forum 12 (1976–1977), 479Google Scholar.

61. Waddams, S.M., The Law of Damages (Toronto: Canada Law Book, 1983), 227–228Google Scholar.

62. Note, “Medical Malpractice Litigation: Some Suggested Improvements and a Possible Alternative,” University of Florida Law Review 18 (1965–1966), 623 at 627Google Scholar.

63. Learner, H., “Restrictive Medical Malpractice Compensation Schemes: A Constitutional ‘Quid Pro Quo’ Analysis to Safeguard Individual Liberties,” Harvard Journal of Legislation 18 (1981), 143 at 164Google Scholar.

64. Barnett, B., “Medical Malpractice: The American Disease. Is It Infectious?” Medical Law Journal (1980), 63Google ScholarPubMed.

65. Stamler, , “Proposed Legislation,” 440, 451Google Scholar.

66. Heintz, D., “Medical Malpractice Arbitration: A Successful Hospital-Based Application,” Insurance Law Journal 680 (1979), 515 at 517Google Scholar; Zuckerman, , “Information on Malpractice,” 103Google Scholar.

67. Buntaine, , “The Price of Health Care Availability,” 1388Google Scholar.

68. Ibid., 1389.

69. Law, , “A Consumer's Perspective on Medical Malpractice,” 315Google Scholar.

70. Saks, , “In Search of the Lawsuit Crisis,” 79Google Scholar.

71. Berkman, , “Alternatives to Medical Malpractice Litigation,” 488Google Scholar.

72. Comment, , “Medical Malpractice Arbitration: A Comparative Analysis,” Virginia Law Review 62 (1976), 1285 at 1290Google Scholar.

73. Ibid.

74. Heintz, , “Medical Malpractice Arbitration,” 516Google Scholar.

75. Friedman, , “Medical Malpractice Arbitration,” 465Google Scholar.

76. Buntaine, , “The Price of Health Care Availability,” 1393Google Scholar.

77. Jones, C., “Medical Malpractice Litigation: Alternatives for Pennsylvania,” Duquesne Law Review 19 (1980–1981), 407, 430Google Scholar; Bedikian, M., “Medical Malpractice Arbitration Act: Michigan's Experience with Arbitration,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 10 (1984–1985), 115Google ScholarPubMed.

78. Buntaine, , “The Price of Health Care Availability,” 1404Google Scholar.

79. Nelson, , “Medical Malpractice and the Transformation in Health Care Delivery,” 344Google Scholar.

80. Comment, , “An Analysis of State Legislative Responses,” 1457Google Scholar; Stamler, , “Proposed Legislation,” 446Google Scholar; MacAlister, and Scanlon, , “Health Claims Arbitration in Maryland,” 490Google Scholar.

81. Ehrhardt, , “One Thousand Seven Hundred Days,” 189Google Scholar.

82. Robinson, , “The Medical Malpractice Crisis of the 1970's,” 28Google Scholar.

83. Heintz, , “Medical Malpractice Arbitration,” 18Google Scholar.

84. MacAlister, and Scanlon, , “Health Claims Arbitration in Maryland,” 516Google Scholar.

85. Ibid.

86. Learner, “Restrictive Medical Malpractice Compensation Schemes.”

87. Danzon, , “The Frequency and Severity of Medical Malpractice Claims,” 77Google Scholar.

88. Henderson, J., “Agreements Changing the Forum for Resolving Malpractice Claims,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 243 at 244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

89. Ehrhardt, , “One Thousand Seven Hundred Days,” 206Google Scholar.

90. Buntaine, , “The Price of Health Care Availability,” 1412Google Scholar.

91. Danzon, , “The Frequency and Severity of Medical Malpractice Claims,” 72Google Scholar.

92. Robinson, , “The Medical Malpractice Crisis of the 1970's,” 31Google Scholar.

93. Danzon, , “The Frequency and Severity of Medical Malpractice Claims,” 59Google Scholar.

94. McLaughlin, W., “A Look at the Massachusetts Malpractice Tribunal System,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 3 (1977–1978), 197 at 206Google Scholar.

95. Ehrhardt, , “One Thousand Seven Hundred Days,” 203Google Scholar.

96. Learner, , “Restrictive Medical Malpractice Compensation Schemes,” 204Google Scholar.

97. MacAlister, and Scanlon, , “Health Claims Arbitration in Maryland,” 502Google Scholar.

98. Boyle, R., “Medical Malpractice Screening Panels: A Judicial Evaluation of the Practical Effect,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 42 (1980–1981), 939 at 958Google Scholar; Note, “A Practical Assessment of Arizona's Medical Malpractice Screening System,” Arizona State Law Journal (1984), 335Google Scholar; Smith, David, “Battling a Receding Tort Frontier Constitutional Attacks on Medical Malpractice Laws, Oklahoma Law Review 38 (1985), 195Google Scholar.

99. MacAlister, and Scanlon, , “Health Claims Arbitration in Maryland,” 502Google Scholar.

100. Learner, “Restrictive Medical Malpractice Compensation Schemes.”

101. Buntaine, “The Price of Health Care Availability.”

102. See Glasbeek, H. and Rowland, S., “Are Injuring and Killing at Work Crimes?” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 17 (1979), 507Google Scholar.

103. Fine, M. and Sunshine, J., “Malpractice Reform Through Consumer Choice and Consumer Education: Are New Concepts Marketable,” Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (1986), 213 at 219–220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

104. But, see Stanton, J., Labour Arbitrations: Boon or Bane for Unions? (Vancouver: Butterworths, 1983)Google Scholar.