Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:33:12.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Missing Terms of the Hobbesian Social Contract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2015

Matthew H. Kramer
Get access

Extract

Analyses of the social contract described by Thomas Hobbes have proceeded in three major directions. First, some readers naturally have felt that Hobbes viewed the primal charter as a genuine outcome of events which truly occurred. Other exegetes have contended that the story of the formation of the social contract was a deliberate fiction—either an artful narrative designed to elicit orderliness, or a heuristic model designed to spark hypothetical reasoning about what would have occurred in a primeval context with specified conditions. Still other analysts affirm that Hobbes used the tale of the social contract as a warning against the evils that plague a society which descends into civil strife.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , July 1994 , pp. 297 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This article is from a chapter on Hobbes in my book, Encounters with Liberalism (in progress). I have made changes to facilitate the excerpting of the article. I wish to thank Nigel Simmonds for his helpful remarks.

1. The texts by Hobbes to which I shall be referring are De Cive: The English Version, H. Warrender, ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983) [hereinafter cited as DC]; The Elements of Law Natural and Politic 2d ed., F. Tönnies & M. Goldsmith, eds, (London: Frank Cass & Co., 1969) [hereinafter cited as EL); and Leviathan, R. Tuck ed., (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) [hereinafter cited as Leviathan].

2. For an interesting approach lo remarks by Hobbes on signification, see Hacking, Ian Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? ch. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975). Hacking makes important distinctions that my own analysis need not make.CrossRefGoogle Scholar