Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:39:33.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List Version 1.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Eric Grafstein ,
Michael J. Bullard ,
David Warren ,
Bernard Unger  and
the CTAS National Working Group
Eric Grafstein*
Affiliation:
St. Paul's Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
Michael J. Bullard
Affiliation:
University of Alberta Hospital and the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
David Warren
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital, London Health Science Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
Bernard Unger
Affiliation:
SMBD–Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
the CTAS National Working Group
Affiliation:
includes representatives of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP), the National Emergency Nurses Affiliation (NENA), l'Association des médecins d'urgence du Québec (AMUQ), the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) and the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada (SRPC)
*
Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver BC V6Z 1Y6; [email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

presenting complaintemergency department information systemsCTAS
Type
CAEP Update • Mise à jour de l'ACMU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 151 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

1.Grafstein, E, Unger, B, Bullard, M, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDrosoph Inf Serv) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0). CJEM 2003;5:27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Beitel, AJ, Olson, KL, Reis, BY, et al. Use of emergency department chief complaint and diagnostic codes for identifying respiratory illness in a paediatric population. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004;20:355–60.Google Scholar
3.Terry, W, Ostrowsky, B, Huang, A. Should we be worried? Investigation for signals generated by an electronic syndromic surveillance system — Westchester County, New York. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(Supp):190–5.Google Scholar
4.Mikosz, CA, Silva, J, Black, S, et al. Comparison of two major emergency department-based free-text chief complaint coding systems. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(Suppl): 101–5.Google Scholar
5.Irvin, CB, Nouhan, PP, Rice, K. Syndromic analysis of computerized emergency department patients’ chief complaints: an opportunity for bioterrorism and influenza surveillance. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:447–52.Google Scholar
6.Murray, M, Bullard, M, Grafstein, E. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. CJEM 2004;6:421–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Gouin, S, Gravel, J, Amre, DK, et al. Evaluation of the Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:243–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gravel, J, Gouin, S, Bailey, B, et al. Evaluation of the validity of a computerized version of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a paediatric emergency department [abstract]. CJEM 2007;9:183.Google Scholar
9.Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Westman, J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. CJEM 2003;5:323–9.Google Scholar
10.Aronsky, D, Kendall, D, Merkley, K, et al. A comprehensive set of coded chief complaints for the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:980–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Gorelick, MH, Alpern, ER, Alessandrini, EA. A system for grouping presenting complaints: the paediatric emergency reason for visit cluster. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:723–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Chapman, WW, Dowling, JN, Wagner, MM. Classification of emergency department chief complaints into 7 syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 527,228 patients. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:445–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Travers, DA, Haas, SW. Evaluation of emergency medical text processor, a system for cleaning chief complaint text data. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11:1170–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Thompson, DA, Eitel, D, Fernandes, CMB, et al. Coded chief complaints — automated analysis of free-text complaints. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:774–82.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Canadian Institute for Health Information. National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS). Available: www.icis.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page=services_nacrs_e (accessed 2008 Jan 20).Google Scholar
16.Bullard, MJ, Unger, B, Spence, J, et al. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidlines. CJEM 2008;10:136–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar