Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:23:46.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residents-as-teachers: a survey of Canadian specialty programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

Catherine Patocka*
Affiliation:
Royal College Emergency Medicine Program, McGill University
Christine Meyers
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, McGill University Health Centre
J. Scott Delaney
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, McGill University Health Centre McGill Sport Medicine Clinic, Montreal, QC
*
McGill Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Royal Victoria Hospital, Room A4.62, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The ability to teach is a critical component of residency and future practice. This is recognized by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, which incorporates teaching functions into the CanMEDS competencies. The aim of our study was to identify how emergency medicine specialty programs across Canada prepare their residents for roles as teachers and to compare these results to those of other Royal College specialty programs.

Methods:

A 40-item English questionnaire was developed and translated into French. It was e-mailed to the program directors of all Royal College Emergency Medicine (EM), Anesthesia, Diagnostic Radiology, General Surgery, Internal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry residency programs. The survey asked what modalities were in use to teach residents how to teach and allowed respondents to comment on recent changes.

Results:

Twelve of 13 (92%) EM programs and 78 of 113 (69%) other specialty programs responded. All responding programs incorporated some kind ofmandatory teaching responsibilities. Four of 12 (33%) EM programs reserved formal teaching functions for postgraduate year 3 and above, whereas only 7 of 78 (9%) other specialty programsdid so. The remaining 71 of 78 (91%) non-EM specialty programs incorporated formal teaching functions in all years of residency. Six of 12 (50%) EM programs offered rotations in clinical medical education compared to only 11 of 78 (14%) other specialty programs.

Conclusions:

Canadian EM programs appear to differ from other specialty programs in the way that they develop residents-as-teachers. Half of EM programs offer rotations in clinical medical education, and many introduce formal teaching functions later in residency.

Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2011

References

REFERENCES

1.Brown, RS. House staff attitudes toward teaching. JMed Educ 1970;45:156–9.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Tonesk, X. The house officer as a teacher: what schools expect and measure. J Med Educ 1979;54:613–6.Google Scholar
3.Schiffman, FJ. The teaching house officer. Yale J Biol Med 1986;59:5561.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Whittaker, LD, Estes, NC, Ash, J, et al. The value of resident teaching to improve student perceptions of surgery clerkships and surgical career choices. Am J Surg 2006;191:320–4, doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.029.Google Scholar
5.Morrison, EH, Hollingshead, J, Hubbell, FA, et al. Reach out and teach someone: generalist residents’ needs for teaching skills development. Fam Med 2002;34:445–50.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Weiss, V, Needlman, R. To teach is to learn twice. Resident teachers learn more. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:190–2.Google Scholar
7.Apter, A, Metzger, R, Glassroth, J. Residents’ perceptions of their role as teachers. JMed Educ 1988;63:900–5.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Frank, J. CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Available at: http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/index.php (accessed December 14, 2010).Google Scholar
9.Morrison, EH, Friedland, JA, Boker, J, et al. Residents-as-teachers training in U.S. residency programs and offices of graduate medical education. Acad Med 2001;76(10 Suppl):S1-4, doi:10.1097/00001888-200110001-00002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Bing-You, RG, Tooker, J. Teaching skills improvement programmes in US internal medicine residencies. Med Educ 1993;27:259–65, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00266.x.Google Scholar
11.Dillman, D. Mail and telephone surveys: the complete method. Troy (NY): Wiley; 1978.Google Scholar
12.Edwards, JC, Kissling, GE, Brannan, JR, et al. Study of teaching residents how to teach. Acad Med 1988;63:603–10, doi:10.1097/00001888-198808000-00003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Bandiera, G, Lee, S, Tiberius, R. Creating effective learning in today’s emergency departments: how accomplished teachers get it done. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45:253–61, doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004. 08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Penciner, R. Clinical teaching in a busy emergency department: strategies for success. CJEM 2002;4:286–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar