Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:39:58.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective evaluation of a guideline for the selective elimination of pre-reduction radiographs in clinically obvious anterior shoulder dislocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Michael Shuster ,
Riyad B. Abu-Laban ,
Jeff Boyd ,
Charles Gauthier ,
Lance Shepherd  and
Chris Turner
Michael Shuster*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mineral Springs Hospital, Banff, Alta.
Riyad B. Abu-Laban
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
Jeff Boyd
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mineral Springs Hospital, Banff, Alta.
Charles Gauthier
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mineral Springs Hospital, Banff, Alta.
Lance Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mineral Springs Hospital, Banff, Alta.
Chris Turner
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mineral Springs Hospital, Banff, Alta.
*
Mineral Springs Hospital, Box 1050, Banff AB T1C 1H7; [email protected]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Research has demonstrated that experienced emergency physicians can identify a subgroup of patients with shoulder dislocation for whom pre-reduction radiographs do not alter patient management. Based on that research, a treatment guideline for the selective elimination of pre-reduction radiographs in clinically evident cases of anterior shoulder dislocation was developed and implemented. The primary objective of this study was to prospectively determine whether the treatment guideline safely eliminates unnecessary radiographs.

Methods:

We enrolled a convenience sample of patients who presented to our rural emergency department with possible shoulder dislocation between November 2000 and April 2001. Physicians scored their level of clinical diagnostic certainty on a 10-cm visual analogue scale prior to viewing pre-reduction radiographs (if obtained). Data were collected on clinical scoring and evaluation, compliance with the guideline, and outcomes.

Results:

A total of 63 patients were enrolled, ranging in age from 17 to 79 years (mean = 33); 87.3% were male. Emergency physicians were certain of shoulder dislocation in 59 (93.7%) patients (95% CI, 84.5%–98.2%) and complied with the treatment guideline in 52 patients (82.5%). Most deviations from the treatment guideline involved the elimination of post-reduction radiographs (which the guideline recommends for all patients). The treatment guideline eliminated 56 (88.9%, 95% CI, 78.4%–95.4%) pre-reduction radiographs, as compared to the standard practice of obtaining pre-reduction films for all cases of suspected shoulder dislocation (p < 0.0001)

Conclusions:

Experienced emergency physicians are frequently certain of the diagnosis of anterior shoulder dislocation on clinical grounds alone and can comfortably and safely use this guideline for the selective elimination of pre-reduction radiographs. Compliance with the guideline substantially decreases pre-reduction radiographs. Validation of the guideline in other settings is warranted.

Keywords

dislocationshoulder dislocationradiograph
Type
EM Advances • Innovations en MU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , July 2002 , pp. 257 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2002

References

1.Roberts, J, Hedges, J.Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 820–9.Google Scholar
2.Linscott, MS.Joint dislocations. In: Harwood-Nuss, A, Linden, C, Luten, R, Sternbach, G, Wolfson, AB, editors. The clinical practice of emergency medicine. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991. p. 382–90.Google Scholar
3.Simon, RR, Koenigsknecht, SJ.Orthopedics in emergency medicine. 3rd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1995. p. 392–400.Google Scholar
4.Daya, M.Shoulder. In: Rosen, P, Danzel, DF, Hockberger, RS, Ling, L, Marcovchick, V, Marx, J, et al, editors. Emergency medicine. 4th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1998. p. 709–39.Google Scholar
5.Macnab, AJ, Cadman, R, MacPhail, I, Wing, PC.Ski-injury research and safety initiatives in British Columbia: a review. BC Med J 1997;39:320–3.Google Scholar
6.Shuster, M, Abu-Laban, RB, Boyd, J.Prereduction radiographs in clinically evident anterior shoulder dislocation. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17(7):653–8.Google Scholar
7.Harvey, RA, Trabulsy, ME, Roe, L.Are postreduction anteroposterior and scapular Y views useful in anterior shoulder dislocations? Am J Emerg Med 1992;10:149–51.Google Scholar
8.Hendey, GW, Kinlaw, K.Clinically significant abnormalities in post-reduction radiographs after anterior shoulder dislocation. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hendey, GW.Necessity of radiographs in the emergency department management of shoulder dislocations. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36:108–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Tannebaum, RD, Kondabala, RK, Stockmal, PJ.Postreduction radiographs for anterior shoulder dislocation: a reappraisal [letter]. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:418.Google Scholar
11.Hendey, GW.Postreduction radiographs for anterior shoulder dislocation: a reappraisal [letter]. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Pasila, M, Jaroma, H, Kiviluoto, O, Sundholm, A.Early complications of primary shoulder dislocations. Acta Orthop Scand 1978;49:260–3.Google Scholar