Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:50:31.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P120: A survey of Ontario Family Health Teams: Family physicians are reliant on emergency services for complicated early pregnancy loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2020

J. Cirone
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Windsor, ON
C. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Windsor, ON
S. McLeod
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Windsor, ON
C. Varner
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Windsor, ON

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: The majority of first trimester pregnancy care in Canada is provided by family physicians and emergency departments (EDs). Early pregnancy loss occurs in approximately 30% of pregnancies, and the majority take place in first trimester when many patients do not yet have an obstetrical care provider. In Ontario, nearly 70% of patients are rostered to a family physician, many of whom practice in Family Health Teams (FHTs). The objective of this study was to determine how Ontario family physicians manage early pregnancy complications and explore the services available for patients experiencing early pregnancy loss or threatened early pregnancy loss. Methods: Family physician leads from 104 Ontario FHTs were contacted by email and invited to complete a 19-item, online questionnaire using modified Dillman methodology. The survey was developed by investigators based on a review of relevant literature and consultation with clinical experts. Prior to distribution, the questionnaire was peer reviewed and tested for face and construct validity, as well as ease of comprehension. Results: Respondents from 50 FHTs across Ontario completed the survey (response rate 48.1%). Of the respondents, 45 (90.0%) reported access to an ED in their community, 45 (90.0%) had access to an obstetrician/gynecologist, 33 (66.0%) had access to an early pregnancy clinic, and 18 (36.0%) reported comprehensive obstetrical care from first trimester to delivery within their FHT. The following services were only accessible through the ED: administration of RhoGAM (n = 28; 56.0%); surgical management of spontaneous or missed abortion (n = 22; 44.0%); same day serum quantitative beta human chorionic gonadotropin (n = 21; 42.0%); same day radiologist-interpreted ultrasound assessment (n = 15; 30.0%); and medical management of spontaneous or missed abortion (n = 12; 24.0%). Forty (80.0%) respondents stated physicians in their practice would provide urgent follow-up care for patients with spontaneous abortion, 35 (70.0%) would provide care for threatened abortion, and 26 (52.0%) would provide urgent care for missed abortion. For patients with a stable ectopic pregnancy, 37 (74.0%) respondents would refer to the ED. Conclusion: This study suggests FHTs in Ontario provide comprehensive care to patients with uncomplicated early pregnancy loss such as spontaneous abortion, yet rely on the ED for management of complicated early pregnancy loss, when medical or surgical management is indicated or for ectopic pregnancy.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2020