Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:51:03.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P108: Fast track in Calgary hospitals: measures for quality improvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

P. Rogers*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
A. Oster
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
D. Wang
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
*
*Corresponding authors

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: Fast track (FT) implementation in emergency departments (ED) has shown a decrease in patient wait times, length of stay (LOS), left without being seen rates, and has increased patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to analyze the demographics and presenting complaints of patients presenting to FT in Calgary EDs using local administrative databases to understand the current selection of FT patients, as well as to uncover potential throughput efficiencies through LOS analysis. Methods: Sunrise Clinical Manager data was pulled from the Foothills Medical Center (FMC), Peter Lougheed Center (PLC), and Rockyview General Hospital (RGH) EDs between October 2015 and September 2016. Based on consensus achieved by the Calgary FT-Minor Treatment Sub-committee, data was descriptively analyzed based on the following criteria: (1) triage profiles of the Calgary ED sites; (2) site admission rates by complaint, Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), vitals, and age; (3) LOS for orthopedic patients admitted from FT/Minor; and, (4) LOS in FT for non-admitted back pain patients. Results: A total of 53911 patients were triaged to FT, with 16224 patients triaged to FMC, 18299 to PLC, and 19388 to RGH. 6.9% of FT patients were admitted to hospital at FMC, 4.8% at PLC and 4.8% at RGH. 14.4% of patients at FMC, 18.3% at PLC and 17.6% at RGH were CTAS 2; 40.9% of patients at FMC, 46.2% at PLC and 37.9% at RGH were CTAS 3; 34.0% of patients at FMC, 27.8% at PLC and 33.3% at RGH were CTAS 4; 10.7% of patients at FMC, 7.7% from PLC and 11.2% for RGH were CTAS 5. For FT patients 80 years or older, 10.4% were admitted at FMC, 13.1% at PLC and 9.4% at RGH. The top FT presenting complaints at all sites were lower extremity injury, upper extremity injury, and laceration/puncture. The annual FT bed hours for patients admitted to orthopedic surgery (consultation request to time of orthopedic admission) was 802.3 hours at FMC, 441.1 PLC and 705.1 from RGH. The annual FT bed hours for patients with non-admitted back pain (FT bed to time of discharge) was 2144.3 hours from FMC, 3367.9 from PLC and 1134.9 from RGH. Conclusion: The efficiency of FT is based on streamlining low acuity patients with an expected rapid discharge from hospital. The results of this investigation will be presented to the FT-Minor Treatment Sub-committee in order to utilize current admission rates, patient profiles, and aggregate LOS to potentially improve throughput.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2017