Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction: Drones are already being used in medicine. They are employed to transport blood products and laboratory samples in rural and remote areas and they are increasingly being tested to deliver external defibrillators outside the hospital to patients with cardiac arrest. As this technology rapidly develops and attracts the attention of the scientific community, we present a rapid systematic review protocol that aims to synthesize the scientific evidence that has tested the use of drones to provide emergency medical care. Methods: A search strategy incorporating the concepts of ‘drone’ and ‘emergency medicine’ was launched in 52 bibliographic databases, including CINAHL and PubMed. Using the artificial intelligence module included in DistillerSR, a reviewer completed the first screening phase by reading the title and abstract of the retrieved articles. To be included, articles had to report empirical research projects that tested the potential uses of drones to improve the quality and accessibility of emergency medical care. These selection criteria were applied to the full text of the included articles during the second screening phase by a single reviewer. The results of these two screening phases will be validated by a second independent reviewer. The bibliography of included studies, relevant scientific journals and literature reviews will be manually searched for relevant articles. Results: The search strategy retrieved 1809 articles, of which 22 met our inclusion criteria in the first and second screening phases. Of these, one study used an empirical research design (qualitative interviews) to evaluate the usefulness of drones in emergency medicine, 17 used simulations or scenarios, and four were comprehensive literature reviews on the use of drones to provide healthcare. The final review will synthesize evidence related to the use of drones in emergency medicine and its impact on emergency medical services: nature of the emergency situation (cardiac arrest, blood transfusion), type of drone (fixed wing, quadcopter), tasks performed by drones (transport, surveillance), improvement in access or quality of care (patient's health, time saved in providing services). Conclusion: Drone technology is evolving rapidly and the indications for its use in providing emergency care is increasing. This rapid systematic review will focus on scientific studies aimed at testing the effectiveness of drones to improve the quality and access to emergency medical care.
