INTRODUCTION
Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) after cardiac arrest often leads to death or incapacitation; however, some patients may have a favorable neurological outcome, justifying aggressive interventions. Avoiding such interventions in unsalvageable patients is economically and morally advised; however, accurate prognosis of HIBI remains a challenge. The role of imaging in the prognosis of HIBI has been limited by an absence of well-designed studies, and no specific guidelines regarding the use of imaging to guide the treatment of HIBI exist.Reference Wijdicks, Hijdra and Young 1
A common technique to image the brain after cardiac arrest is computed tomography (CT), which is often performed to exclude a neurological etiology. CT may reveal secondary injury and edema after cardiac arrest, suggesting a poor clinical course. However, these findings usually appear on the second day or later, and cerebral edema is only present in approximately 30 percent of patients.Reference Topcuoglu, Oguz and Buyukserbetci 2 , Reference Naples, Ellison and Brady 3 Indeed, patients may recover meaningful neurological function, despite evidence of extensive injury on imaging.Reference Finelli and DiMario 4 Furthermore, findings on imaging may create a self-fulfilling prophecy. Clinicians may recognize abnormalities on imaging and restrict treatments, fostering a link between those findings and poor clinical outcome.Reference Samaniego, Mlynash and Caulfield 5 , Reference Fugate, Wijdicks and Mandrekar 6
One prognostic factor on imaging that has received recent attention is the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The optic nerve sheath is an extension of the dura and contains cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the optic nerve. CSF shunts into the optic nerve sheath in the setting of brain injury and edema, causing the ONSD to increase.Reference Launey, Nesseler and Le Maguet 7 , Reference Helmke and Hansen 8 Cerebral edema increases the intracranial pressure (ICP). ONSD has been shown to correlate with ICP and with outcome in the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI).Reference Sekhon, Griesdale and Robba 9 , Reference Sekhon, McBeth and Zou 10 In TBI, ICP monitoring as a means to guide therapy is the standard of care, and the ONSD may be a useful surrogate. 11
Whereas the role of ICP monitoring in TBI is well established, its role in HIBI is less clear. Kim et al. recently reported that, in patients with HIBI in the emergency department, the ONSD as measured by CT closely correlated with neurological outcome.Reference Hwan Kim, Ho Lee and Kun Hong 12 The purpose of our study was to further investigate the relationship between ONSD and functional outcome in patients who have HIBI after cardiac arrest.
METHODS
This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study and is reported as per the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.Reference Vandenbroucke, von Elm and Altman 13 The University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board approved the protocol and waived consent (H14-01664).
Population and study setting
We used a database of all patients admitted to the coronary care and intensive care units at St. Paul’s Hospital between 2009 and 2013 to identify patients with a head CT performed within 48 hours after surviving cardiac arrest. Both out-of-hospital and in-hospital arrests were included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, death within 6 hours of admission, and patients transferred from another institution. A flow diagram detailing cohort selection is displayed in Figure 1.
Data acquisition
The following variables were obtained from the data set: patient’s age, sex, presence of prehospital hypotension or hypoxemia, location of arrest (in v. out of hospital), primary rhythm of arrest (asystole, pulseless electrical activity or ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia), presence of witness to arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), presence of defibrillation, time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), post-arrest Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) and mean arterial pressure, admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and use of therapeutic hypothermia. Outcome measure was the functional status as measured by the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale. The CPC has five categories ranging from good cerebral performance (CPC 1) to death (CPC 5).
ONSD measurement
Images were obtained with a General Electric CT scanner in a standardized protocol producing contiguous non-contrast 2-mm slices from the base of the skull to the vertex. Images were viewed on Inteliviewer (Intelerad Medical Systems, Montreal QC) in the “abdomen” window (Hounsfield range +25 to +40) at magnification level 3×, which demonstrated the optic nerve sheaths in greatest detail. Following training by a neurointensivist (MS), three investigators (BR, AW, LB) measured the right and left ONSD 3 mm behind the optic papilla and perpendicular to the linear axis of the optic nerve. Right- and left-sided values were averaged for final analysis. All investigators were blinded to the CPC score and outcomes of the patients during ONSD measurement.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using SAS v9.3 (Cary, NC, USA). Normally distributed data were analysed using the t-test; for non-normally distributed data, the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used. The ONSD was treated as a continuous variable; however, the CPC score was dichotomized. A score of 2 or less on the CPC scale was considered a good outcome, whereas a score of 3 or more was classified as a poor neurological outcome. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) was calculated between the three groups of ONSD measurers and equaled 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97).
A logistic regression model was created to model good versus poor neurological outcome. Variables included in the model were age, witness to arrest, time to ROSC, initial GCS, location of arrest, presence of bystander CPR, shockability of rhythm, and ONSD treated as a continuous variable. Two further models were created treating ONSD as a dichotomized variable at >8 mm and >7 mm in order to ascertain whether a cut-off level for ONSD would help predict neurological outcome. The C statistic for the main model with ONSD as a continuous variable was 0.95.
RESULTS
A total of 72 cardiac arrest survivors who met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis; 54 (75.0%) of the patients had a poor neurological outcome, whereas 18 (25.0%) patients were discharged from the hospital with a CPC score of ≤2 (Table 1). Of the poor outcome group, 53 (98.1%) patients died in the hospital. The time to ROSC for patients with a good outcome was 9.3 minutes (SD 7.8), compared to 27.7 minutes (SD 15.0) for patients with a poor outcome (p<0.0001). The mean initial GCS for good outcome patients was 6 (range 3-15), compared to 4 (range 3-11) for patients with a poor outcome (p=0.02). There was a trend towards benefit for witnessed arrest (94.4% v. 76.0%, p=0.09) and age (57.7 years SD 15.3 v. 64.1 SD 15.1, p=0.12) for a good functional outcome; however, these were not statistically significant. There were no observed differences in male gender (83.3% v. 83.3%, p=0.99), shockable rhythm (38.9% v. 27.8%, p=0.79), bystander CPR (88.9% v. 79.6%, p=0.50), defibrillation (38.9% v. 40.7%, p=0.89), or out-of-hospital location (55.6% v. 70.4%, p=0.26) between the two groups.
ROSC=return of spontaneous circulation; GCS=Glasgow Coma Scale; ONSD=optic nerve sheath diameter; SD=standard deviation.
A CT head was obtained for patients in the good outcome group in a mean time of 9.3 hours (SD 10.0) compared to 10.2 hours (SD 11.2) for the poor outcome group (p=0.75). There was no difference in average ONSD observed between the two outcome groups (6.66 mm SD 0.78 v. 6.60 mm SD 0.82, p=0.77).
Multiple logistic regression failed to show any association between ONSD and neurological outcome when adjusted for all other covariates (OR 1.32 95% CI 0.40-4.34, p=0.65, Table 2). Setting an ONSD threshold of >8 mm (OR 2.32 95% CI 0.14-39.40, p=0.55) or >7 mm (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.03-2.77, p=0.28) also failed to show any association on neurological outcome. Age in years (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.29, p=0.01), Time to ROSC (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.83, p=0.01) and out-of-hospital arrest (OR 26.02, 95% CI 1.04-654.01, p=0.04) were predictive of a poor neurological outcome.
ROSC=return of spontaneous circulation; GCS=Glasgow Coma Scale; ONSD=optic nerve sheath diameter.
DISCUSSION
We found that the ONSD as measured on CT scan was not an independent predictor of poor neurological outcome in a cardiac arrest population. This was observed on both univariate as well as multiple logistic regression analysis. The ONSD did not differ significantly between the two groups. These results are in disagreement with the findings published by Kim et al.Reference Hwan Kim, Ho Lee and Kun Hong 12
The importance of relying on an imaging parameter to determine prognosis justifies studies of replication. Thus, we aimed to replicate the work of Kim et al., in order to assess the validity of the ONSD in a similar population.Reference Hwan Kim, Ho Lee and Kun Hong 12 We studied a more homogeneous population of cardiac arrest patients, because patients suffering drowning, poisoning, and other non-cardiac arrests were included in their analysis. The mean value for ONSD was larger than that of Kim et al., but was less than previously reported in the TBI population.Reference Legrand, Jeanjean and Delanghe 14 This difference may be due to differences in CT scanning techniques, window of measurement, or timing of CT scan. Our CT scans were performed on average 10 hours after arrest, whereas those in the study by Kim et al. were performed on avserage 1 hour after ROSC.
As the understanding and management of patients who suffer HIBI post-cardiac arrest evolve, more information as to the pathology of brain injury in HIBI patients will hopefully become available. Intracranial hypertension has been shown to occur late in post-arrest patients, potentially due to hyperemic perfusion.Reference Iida, Satoh and Arita 15 The cause for cardiac arrest may also contribute to the degree of cerebral edema and HIBI. Arrests caused by respiratory failure cause cerebral hypoxia before the cessation of cardiac function, potentially worsening the degree of brain injury compared to ischemic arrests.Reference Morimoto, Kemmotsu and Kitami 16
The measurement of ONSD on CT scan, as with any measurement, contains a certain degree of uncertainty and error. We attempted to minimize measurement error by having three trained blinded investigators measure the ONSD separately. As demonstrated by the ICC of 0.94, there were no significant differences between the measurements obtained by the three investigators. For ONSD to be a clinically useful tool, it must be able to be measured by clinicians accurately with minimal training.
Our study must be interpreted within the context of the study design. Because it was a single-centre retrospective analysis, the conclusions must be interpreted with caution. Variations in CT scan technology, interpretation of ONSD as well as the clinical care of patients who suffer cardiac arrest may differ between practice locations. The cohort of patients studied also suffered cardiac arrest from a variety of causes, including hypoxemic arrests. It is possible that the natural history of HIBI post-arrest varies, depending on the cause of arrest.
The neurological prognostication of patients with cardiac arrest continues to be a difficult clinical decision. Clinicians must rely on multiple sources of data, including physical exam, laboratory values, as well as imaging in order to make the best decision for their patients. For prognostic markers to be useful, they must be unambiguous, reliable, reproducible, and precise. Our findings should bring a degree of caution into the utilization of ONSD for prognostic decision-making, post-cardiac arrest. Further large prospective multi-centre studies would help delineate the true role of ONSD in providing prognostic information for these patients.
Financial support: The VGH & UBC Hospital Foundation Best of Health Fund supported this research.
Competing interests: None declared.