Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:06:42.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimally angulated pediatric wrist fractures: Is immobilization without manipulation enough?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Khalid Al-Ansari ,
Andrew Howard ,
Brian Seeto ,
Solina Yoo ,
Salma Zaki  and
Kathy Boutis
Khalid Al-Ansari
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Andrew Howard
Affiliation:
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Brian Seeto
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Solina Yoo
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Salma Zaki
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Kathy Boutis*
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
*
Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Toronto ON M5G 1X8

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Emergency department (ED) manipulation of complete minimally angulated distal radius fractures in children may not be necessary, due to the excellent remodeling potential of these fractures.

Objectives:

The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of minimally angulated distal radius fractures managed in the ED with plaster immobilization that subsequently required manipulation. Our secondary objective was to document, at follow-up, changes in angulation for each wrist fracture.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study reviewed consecutive records of all children with bi-cortical minimally angulated (≤15° of angulation in the sagittal plane and ≤0.5 cm of displacement) distal metaphyseal radius fractures, alone or in combination with distal ulnar fracture. Details of treatment, radiographic findings, and clinical outcomes during the subsequent orthopedic follow up were recorded.

Results:

Of 124 patients included in the analysis, none required manipulation after their ED visit. All but 14 (11.3%) fractures were angulated ≤20° within the follow-up period. Two (1.6%) fractures that were initially angulated ≤15° progressed to 30°–35°, but remodeled within 2 years to nearly perfect anatomic alignment. By 6 weeks post-injury, no patients had clinically apparent deformity and all had normal function.

Conclusions:

Minimally angulated fractures of the distal metaphyseal radius managed in plaster immobilization without reduction in the ED are unlikely to require future surgical intervention.

Keywords

pediatricsinjuryfracture
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 9 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2007

References

1.Bachman, D, Santora, S. Orthopedic trauma. In: Fleisher, G, Ludwig, S, Henretig, FM, et al, editors. Textbook of pediatric emergency medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 1455–7.Google Scholar
2.Waters, PM.Distal radius and ulna fractures. In: Beaty, JH, Kasser, JR, editors. Fractures in children. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.Google Scholar
3.Do, TT, Strub, WM, Foad, SL, et al. Reduction versus remodeling in pediatric distal forearm fractures: a preliminary cost analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B 2003;12:109–15.Google Scholar
4.Johari, AN, Sinha, M.Remodeling of forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 1999;8:84–7.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Perona, PG LT. Remodeling of the skeletally immature distal radius. J Orthop Trauma 1990;4:356–61.Google Scholar
6.Price, CT, Scott, DS, Kurzner, ME, et al. Malunited forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:705–12.Google Scholar
7.Wilkins, KE.Principles of fracture remodeling in children. Injury 2005;36(suppl 1):A3-11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Greenspan, A.Orthopedic radiology: a practical approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.Google Scholar
9.Slongo, T, Audigé, L, Schlickewei, W, et al. Development and validation of the AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures by the Pediatric Expert Group of the AO Foundation in collaboration with AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation and the International Association for Pediatric Traumatology. J Pediatr Orthop 2006;26:43–9.Google Scholar
10.Pena, B, Kraus, B.Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:483–91.Google Scholar
11.Schranz, PJ, Fagg, PD.Undisplaced fractures of the distal third of the radius in children: an innocent fracture. Injury 1992;23:165–7.Google Scholar
12.Johnson, PG, Szabo, RM.Angle measurements of the distal radius: a cadaver study. Skeletal Radiol 1993;22:243–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed