Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:30:17.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO69: A retrospective cohort study on the impact of point-of-care ultrasound on radiologic imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected uncomplicated renal colic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2019

J. Alain*
Affiliation:
Laval University, Québec, QC
R. Huard
Affiliation:
Laval University, Québec, QC
A. Mokhtari
Affiliation:
Laval University, Québec, QC
M. Parent
Affiliation:
Laval University, Québec, QC
D. Simonyan
Affiliation:
Laval University, Québec, QC
S. Berthelot
Affiliation:
Laval University, Québec, QC

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: The number of CT scans prescribed in the Emergency department (ED) for suspected renal colic has increased over recent years without an associated improvement in patient-centred outcomes. We assessed whether Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) decreases the use of formal radiologic imaging. Methods: We completed a retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients 18 years of age and older presenting to the ED with suspected uncomplicated renal colic in a tertiary care centre in Québec in 2016. Exclusion criteria included: previous urologic intervention, solitary kidney, dialysis, fever, pyuria, acute kidney injury, pregnancy, suspicion of a serious alternative diagnosis or persistent symptoms despite analgesia. We compared the proportion (95%CI) of formal radiologic imaging performed (Ultrasound or CT) in patients who had PoCUS in the ED vs. those who did not. Two-tailed Fisher exact test (α = 0.05) and odds ratios (95%CI) calculated from multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, Charlson Index and previous renal colic were used to compare the two groups. The reliability of data collection was evaluated with a kappa score (95%CI). Results: 169 patients with uncomplicated renal colic were included. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, Charlson Index, or previous renal colic. The PoCUS level of training and the doctor's education level was significantly higher in the PoCUS group. There was a non-significant trend towards less formal imaging in patients of the PoCUS group 65/88 (73.9% [63.4-82.7%]) vs. the non-PoCUS group 69/81 (85.2% [75.6-92.1%]), p = 0.087. After adjustment for confounders, the patients not evaluated with PoCUS were more likely to have formal imaging with a significant odds ratio of 2.41 [1.05-5.56]). Among patients who underwent a CT, incidentalomas were found in 16.5% and only 2.0% demonstrated significant findings leading to changes in ED management, such as an alternative diagnosis, need for admission, or an urgent urological intervention. Inter-observer agreement was excellent between assessers with a kappa score of 0.88 [0.66-1.00]. Conclusion: ED patients with uncomplicated renal colic who are investigated with PoCUS tend to have fewer formal imaging test. When CT scans were performed, incidentalomas were found in 16.5% and ED management changed only 2.0% of the time. PoCUS appears to be a useful tool for decreasing CT utilisation in this low-risk ED population.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2019