Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:58:40.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO18: The state of the evidence for emergency medical services (EMS) care of prehospital hypoglycemia: an analysis of appraised research from the Prehospital Evidence-based Practice Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2020

J. Greene
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
J. Goldstein
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
R. Brown
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
J. Swain
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
D. Fidgen
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
Y. Leroux
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
J. McVey
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
J. Jensen
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
A. Carter
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction: The Prehospital Evidence-based Practice (PEP) program is an online, freely accessible, continuously updated repository of appraised EMS research evidence. This report is an analysis of published evidence for EMS interventions used to assess and treat patients suffering from hypoglycemia. Methods: PubMed was systematically searched in June 2019. One author screened titles, abstracts and full-texts for relevance. Trained appraisers reviewed full text articles, scored each on a three-point Level of Evidence (LOE) scale (based on study design and quality) and three-point Direction of Evidence (DOE) scale (supportive, neutral, or opposing findings for each intervention's primary outcome), abstracted the primary outcome, setting and assigned an outcome category (patient or process). Second party appraisal was conducted for all included studies. The level and direction of each intervention was plotted in an evidence matrix, based on appraisals. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included and appraised for seven interventions: 5 drugs (Dextrose 50% (D50), Dextrose 10% (D10), glucagon, oral glucose and thiamine), one assessment tool (point-of-care (POC) glucose testing) and one call disposition (treat-and-release). The most frequently reported study primary outcomes were related to: clinical improvement (n = 15, 51.7%), feasibility/safety (n = 8, 27.6%), and diagnostics (n = 6, 20.7%). The majority of outcomes were patient focused (n = 18, 62.0%). Conclusion: EMS interventions for treating hypoglycemia are informed by high-quality supportive evidence. Both D50 and D10 are supported by high-quality evidence; suggesting D10 may be an effective alternative to the standard D50. “Treat-and-release” practices for hypoglycemia are supported by moderate-quality evidence for the patient related outcomes of relapse, patient preference and complications. This body of evidence is high-quality, patient-focused and conducted in the prehospital setting thus generalizable paramedic practice.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2020