Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:27:16.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LO13: Development of a national, standardized simulation case template

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2020

J. Baylis
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
C. Heyd
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
B. Thoma
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
A. Hall
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
T. Chaplin
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
A. Petrosoniak
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
T. McColl
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
M. O'Brien
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
J. Deshaies
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
K. Caners
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Innovation Concept: A major barrier to the development of a national simulation case repository and multi-site simulation research is the lack of a standardized national case template. This issue was recently identified as a priority research topic for Canadian simulation based education (SBE) research in emergency medicine (EM). We partnered with the EM Simulation Education Researchers Collaborative (EM-SERC) to develop a national simulation template. Methods: The EM Sim Cases template was chosen as a starting point for the consensus process. We generated feedback on the template using a three-phase modified nominal group technique. Members of the EM-SERC mailing list were consulted, which included 20 EM simulation educators from every Canadian medical school except Northern Ontario School of Medicine and Memorial University. When comments conflicted, the sentiment with more comments in favour was incorporated. Curriculum, Tool or Material: In phase one we sought free-text feedback on the EM Sim Cases template via email. We received 65 comments from 11 respondents. An inductive thematic analysis identified four major themes (formatting, objectives, debriefing, and assessment tools). In phase two we sought free-text feedback on the revised template via email. A second thematic analysis on 40 comments from 12 respondents identified three broad themes (formatting, objectives, and debriefing). In phase three we sought feedback on the penultimate template via focus groups with simulation educators and technologists at multiple Canadian universities. This phase generated 98 specific comments which were grouped according to the section of the template being discussed and used to develop the final template (posted on emsimcases.com). Conclusion: We describe a national consensus-building process which resulted in a simulation case template endorsed by simulation educators from across Canada. This template has the potential to: 1. Reduce the replication of effort across sites by facilitating the sharing of simulation cases. 2. Enable national collaboration on the development of both simulation cases and curricula. 3. Facilitate multi centre simulation-based research by removing confounders related to the local adoption of an unfamiliar case template. This could improve the rigour and validity of these studies by reducing inter-site variability. 4. Increase the validity of any simulation scenarios developed for use in national high-stakes assessment.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2020