Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:52:20.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How does “knowledge translation” affect my clinical practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2015

Eddy S. Lang  and
David Johnson
Eddy S. Lang*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
David Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
*
Emergency Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Unit 1633, 1632–14th Avenue NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1M7; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Knowledge translation is emerging as an increasingly important area of research and practice aiming to remedy the disconnection between evidence-based clinical care and real-life practice. The discipline is informed by a large body of literature and practical tools, which can inform providers and leaders in health care. Front-line clinicians should be aware of the principles of knowledge translation and the evidence that defines successful and suboptimal strategies for introducing evidence-based care at the system level.

Keywords

evidence to actionimplementationknowledge translation
Type
Education • Enseignement
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , March 2012 , pp. 182 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2012

References

REFERENCES

1.Dowling, S, Spooner, CH, Liang, Y, et al. Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:277–87, doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00333.x.Google Scholar
2.Canadian Institutes of Health Research. More about knowledge translation at CIHR. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/39033.html (accessed November 15, 2010).Google Scholar
3.Osmond, MH, Gazarian, M, Henry, RL, et al. PERC Spacer Study Group. Barriers to metered-dose inhaler/spacer use in Canadian pediatric emergency departments: a national survey. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:1106–13.Google Scholar
4.Cabana, MD, Rand, CS, Powe, NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458–65, doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.Google Scholar
5.Stiell, IG, Clement, CM, Grimshaw, JM, et al. A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments. CMAJ 2010;182:1527–32, doi:10.1503/cmaj.091974.Google Scholar
6.Graham, ID, Logan, J, Harrison, MB, et al. Lost in knowledge ranslation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26: 13–24, doi:10.1002/chp.47.Google Scholar
7.Bradley, EH, Herrin, J, Wang, Y, et al. Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2308–20, doi:10.1056/NEJMsa063117.Google Scholar
8.Curran, JA, Dartnell, J, Magee, K, et al. Organisational and professional interventions to promote the uptake of evidence in emergency care: effects on professional practice and health outcomes (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):CD006557.Google Scholar
9.Curran, JA, Dartnell, J, Magee, K, et al. Organisational and professional interventions to promote the uptake of evidence in emergency care: effects on professional practice and health outcomes (protocol). Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006557/pdf.Google Scholar