Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:17:21.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the Prehospital Index, presence of high-velocity impact and judgment of emergency medical technicians as criteria for trauma triage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Andre Lavoie ,
Marcel Émond ,
Lynne Moore ,
Stéphanie Camden  and
Moishe Liberman
Andre Lavoie*
Affiliation:
Unité de recherche en traumatologie-urgence-soins intensifs, Centre de recherche du CHA (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Québec City, Que. Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec City, Que.
Marcel Émond
Affiliation:
Unité de recherche en traumatologie-urgence-soins intensifs, Centre de recherche du CHA (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Québec City, Que. Départment de médecine familliale – section médecine d'urgence, Université Laval, Québec City, Que.
Lynne Moore
Affiliation:
Unité de recherche en traumatologie-urgence-soins intensifs, Centre de recherche du CHA (Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus), Québec City, Que. Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec City, Que.
Stéphanie Camden
Affiliation:
Unité de recherche en santé des populations, Centre de recherche du CHA, Québec City, Que.
Moishe Liberman
Affiliation:
Division de chirurgie thoracique, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal (Hôpital Notre-Dame), Montréal, Que.
*
Centre de recherche du CHA (Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus), Unité de recherche en traumatologiemédecine d'urgence-soins intensifs, 1401 18e rue, Québec City QCG1J 1Z4; [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

We sought to evaluate the performance of the Prehospital Index (PHI), the high-velocity impact (HVI) criterion and emergency medical technician (EMT) judgment for the prehospital triage of injured patients.

Methods:

The study population included all prehospital trauma patients transported by an emergency medical service to 2 level-I trauma centres for adults. All prehospital run sheets were linked to trauma registry data. The main outcome was severe trauma, defined as death within 72 hours, admission to the intensive care unit within 24 hours or an Injury Severity Score greater than 15. We assessed sensitivity, specificity and rates of overtriage.

Results:

Of 16 805 patients in the study population, 1113 (6.62%) had severe trauma. The combination of all 3 triage criteria (PHI score ≥ 4, HVI presence and EMT judgment) performed best for identifying patients with severe trauma, with a sensitivity of 74.2% but with an overtriage rate of 85.1%. Alone, EMT judgment had the highest sensitivity and a PHI score of 4 or greater had the lowest rate of overtriage.

Conclusion:

Although the combination of PHI score, HVI presence and EMT judgment offers the highest sensitivity for the identification of patients that could benefit from direct transport to a level-I trauma centre, overall sensitivity remains low and overtriage is high. More research is required to improve prehospital triage.

Keywords

traumatriageprehospitalemergency medical systememergency medical technicianambulanceinjury severity
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , March 2010 , pp. 111 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2010

References

REFERENCES

1.Angus, DE, Cloutier, E, Albert, T, et al. The economic burden of unintentional injury in Canada. Toronto (ON): Smartrisk Foundation; 1998.Google Scholar
2.CDC injury fact book, 2006. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/Injury/publications /FactBook/Directors_Messages-2006-a.pdf (accessed 2010 Jan 22).Google Scholar
3.Celso, B, Tepas, J, Langland-Orban, B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma 2006;60:371–8, discussion 378.Google Scholar
4.Liberman, M, Mulder, DS, Lavoie, A, et al. Implementation of a trauma care system: evolution through evaluation. J Trauma 2004;56:1330–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Mann, NC, Hedges, JR, Sandoval, R, et al. Trauma system impact on admission site: a comparison of two states. J Trauma 1999;46:631–7.Google Scholar
6.Ciesla, DJ, Sava, JA, Street, JH III, et al. Secondary overtriage: a consequence ofan immature trauma system. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:131–7.Google Scholar
7.Cook, CH, Muscarella, P, Praba, AC, et al. Reducing overtriage without compromising outcomes in trauma patients. Arch Surg 2001;136:752–6.Google Scholar
8.Gabbe, BJ, Cameron, PA, Wolfe, R, et al. Prehospital prediction of intensive care unit stay and mortality in blunt trauma patients. J Trauma 2005;59:458–65.Google Scholar
9.Senkowski, CK, McKenney, MG. Trauma scoring systems: a review. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:491–503.Google Scholar
10.Koehler, JJ, Baer, LJ, Malafa, SA, et al. Prehospital Index: a scoring system for field triage of trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:178–82.Google Scholar
11.Lowe, DK, Oh, GR, Neely, KW, et al. Evaluation of injury mechanism as a criterion in trauma triage. Am J Surg 1986;152:6–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Bouillon, B, Lefering, R, Vorweg, M, et al. Trauma score systems: Cologne Validation Study. J Trauma 1997;42:652–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Emerman, CL, 1Shade, B, Kubincanek, J. A comparison of EMT judgment and prehospital trauma triage instruments. J Trauma 1991;31:1369–75.Google Scholar
14.Jones, J, Newman, C, Krohmer, J, et al. Accuracy of the Prehospital Index in identifying major hemorrhage in trauma victims. Prehosp Disaster Med 1993;8:237–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Koehler, JJ, Malafa, SA, Hillesland, J, et al. A multicenter validation of the prehospital index. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:380–5.Google Scholar
16.Plant, JR, MacLeod, DB, Korbeek, J. Limitations of the prehospital index in identifying patients in need of a major trauma center. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:133–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Tamim, H, Joseph, L, Mulder, D, et al. Field triage of trauma patients: improving on the Prehospital Index. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:170–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Bond, RJ, Kortbeek, JB, Preshaw, RM. Field trauma triage: combining mechanism of injury with the prehospital index for an improved trauma triage tool. J Trauma 1997;43:283–7.Google Scholar
19.Palanca, S, Taylor, DM, Bailey, M, et al. Mechanisms of motor vehicle accidents that predict major injury. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2003;15:423–8.Google Scholar
20.Boyle, MJ. Is mechanism of injury alone in the prehospital setting a predictor of major trauma — a review of the literature. J Trauma Manag Outcomes 2007;1:4.Google Scholar
21.Boyle, MJ, Smith, EC, Archer, F. Is mechanism of injury alone a useful predictor of major trauma? Injury 2008;39:986–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Mulholland, SA, Gabbe, BJ, Cameron, P. Is paramedic judgement useful in prehospital trauma triage? Injury 2005;36:1298–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Canadian Institute for Health Information. National trauma registry. Ottawa (ON): The Institute; 2009. Available: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page=services_ntr_e (accessed 2010 Jan 19).Google Scholar
24.Chang, DC, Bass, RR, Cornwell, EE, et al. Undertriage of elderly trauma patients to state-designated trauma centers. Arch Surg 2008;143:776–81, discussion 782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Fries, GR, McCalla, G, Levitt, MA, et al. A prospective comparison of paramedic judgment and the trauma triage rule in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:885–9.Google Scholar
26.Mulholland, SA, Cameron, PA, Gabbe, BJ, et al. Prehospital prediction of the severity of blunt anatomic injury. J Trauma 2008;64:754–60.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Simmons, E, Hedges, JR, Irwin, L, et al. Paramedic injury severity perception can aid trauma triage. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:461–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Henry, MC, Hollander, JE, Alicandro, JM, et al. Incremental benefit of individual American Collegeof Surgeons trauma triage criteria. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:992–1000.Google Scholar
29.Lehmann, R, Brounts, L, Lesperance, K, et al. A simplified set of trauma triage criteria to safelyreduce overtriage: a prospective study. Arch Surg 2009;144:853–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Lehmann, RK, Arthurs, ZM, Cuadrado, DG, et al. Trauma team activation: simplified criteria safely reduces overtriage. Am J Surg 2007;193:630–4, discussion 634–5.Google Scholar
31.Luk, SS, Jacobs, L, Ciraulo, DL, et al. Outcome assessment of physiologic and clinical predictors of survival in patients after traumatic injury with a trauma score less than 5. J Trauma 1999;46:1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Henry, MC. Trauma triage: New York experience. Prehosp Emerg Care 2006;10:295–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Knopp, R, Yanagi, A, Kallsen, G, et al. Mechanism of injury and anatomic injury as criteria for prehospital trauma triage. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:895–902.Google Scholar
34.Baxt, WG, Berry, CC, Epperson, MD, et al. The failure of prehospital trauma prediction rules to classify trauma patients accurately. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:1–8.Google Scholar
35.Newgard, CD, Hedges, JR, Diggs, B, et al. Establishing the need for trauma center care: Anatomic injury or resource use? Prehosp Emerg Care 2008;12:451–8.Google Scholar
36.Lavoie, A, Gagne, M, Belcaid, A, et al. Trauma registry inclusion criteria and severe injury representativeness [abstract]. J Trauma 2008;64:551.Google Scholar
37.Cottington, EM, Young, JC, Shufflebarger, CM, et al. The utility of physiological status, injury site, and injury mechanism in identifying patients with major trauma. JTrauma 1988;28:305–11.Google Scholar