Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T02:18:24.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chest Pain in Emergency Department Patients: If the Pain is Relieved by Nitroglycerin, is it More Likely to be Cardiac Chest Pain?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Robert Steele ,
Timothy McNaughton ,
Melissa McConahy  and
John Lam
Robert Steele*
Affiliation:
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.
Timothy McNaughton
Affiliation:
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.
Melissa McConahy
Affiliation:
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.
John Lam
Affiliation:
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.
*
Emergency Department, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Loma Linda CA 92354

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

It is often believed that chest pain relieved by nitroglycerin is indicative of coronary artery disease origin.

Objective:

To determine if relief of chest pain with nitroglycerin can be used as a diagnostic test to help differentiate cardiac chest pain and non-cardiac chest pain.

Design:

Prospective observational cohort study with a 4-week follow-up of patients enrolled.

Setting:

Academic tertiary care hospital, with 60 000 visits/year.

Inclusion criteria:

Adult patients presenting to the emergency department with active chest pain who received nitroglycerin and were admitted for chest pain.

Exclusion criteria:

Patients with acute myocardial infarction diagnosed after obtaining an ECG, patients whose chest pain could not be quantified, those for whom no cardiac work-up was done, or those who received emergent cardiac catheterization.

Results:

270 patients were enrolled. Nitroglycerin relieved chest pain in 66% of the subjects. The diagnostic sensitivity of nitroglycerin to determine cardiac chest pain was 72% (64%–80%), and the specificity was 37% (34%–41%). The positive likelihood ratio for having coronary artery disease if nitroglycerin relieved chest pain was 1.1 (0.96–1.34). Telephone follow-up at 4 weeks was performed, with a 95% follow-up rate.

Conclusions:

Relief of chest pain with nitroglycerin is not a reliable diagnostic test and does not distinguish between cardiac and non-cardiac chest pain.

Keywords

chest painnitroglycerin
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , May 2006 , pp. 164 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2006

References

1.Fothergill, NJ, Hunt, MT, Touquet, R. Audit of patients with chest pain presenting to an accident and emergency department over a 6-month period. Arch Emerg Med 1993;10(3):155–60.Google Scholar
2.Engelberg, S, Singer, AJ, Moldashel, J, et al. Effects of prehospital nitroglycerin on hemodynamics and chest pain intensity. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000;4:290–3.Google Scholar
3.Braunwald, E, Zipes, DP, Libby, P, editors. Heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascualr medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 27–44.Google Scholar
4.O’Rourke, RA, Shaver, JA, Salerni, R, et al. The history, physical examination, and cardiac auscultation. In: Alexander, RW, Schlant, RC, Furster, V, editors. Hurst’s The heart. 9th ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill; 1998. p. 229–342.Google Scholar
5.Weiner, DA, Ryan, TJ, McCabe, CH, et al. Exercise stress testing: correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary artery disease in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). N Engl J Med 1979;301:230–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Diamond, GA, Forrester, JS, Hirsch, M, et al. Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest 1980;65:1210–21.Google Scholar
7.Decker, WW, Prina, LD, Smars, PA, et al. Continous 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring in an emergency department chest pain unit: an assessment of potential clinical effect. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:342–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Braunwald, E, Antman, EM, Beasley, JW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) [published erratum appears in Circulation 2000;102(14):1739]. Circulation 2000;102(10):1193–209.Google Scholar
9.McCarthy, BD, Beshansky, JR, D’Agostino, RB, et al. Missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:579–82.Google Scholar
10.Pope, JH, Aufderheide, TP, Ruthazer, R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1163–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Selker, HP, Beshansky, JR, Griffith, JL, et al. Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with the triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:845–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Selker, HP, Zalenski, RJ, Antman, EM, et al. An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: executive summary of the National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group Report. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:1–12.Google Scholar
13.Zalenski, RJ, McCarren, M, Roberts, R, et al. An evaluation of a chest pain diagnostic protocol to exclude cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1085–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Gisolf, J, Westerhof, BE, van Dijk, N, et al. Sublingual nitroglycerin used in routine tilt testing provokes a cardiac output-mediated vasovagal response. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:588–93.Google Scholar
15.Shry, EA, Dacus, J, Van De Graaff, E, et al. Usefulness of the response to sublingual nitroglycerin as a predictor of ischemic chest pain in the emergency department. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1264–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Henrikson, C, Howell, E, Bush, D, et al. Chest pain relief does not predict active coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:979–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Diercks, D, Boghos, E, Guzman, H, et al. Changes in the numeric descriptive scale for pain after sublingual nitroglycerin do not predict cardiac etiology of chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45:581–5.Google Scholar
18.Antman, EM, Cohen, M, Bernink, P, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI. A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision-making. JAMA 2000;284:835–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Mackinnon, A. A spreadsheet for the calculation of comprehensive statistics for the assessment of diagnostic tests and interrater agreement. Comput Biol Med 2000;30:127–34.Google Scholar