Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:06:02.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CCFP-EM versus FRCP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Sam Campbell
Sam Campbell*
Affiliation:
Dalhousie UniversityHalifax, [email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters • Courrier
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , March 2003 , pp. 80
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2003

References

1.Ducharme, J, Innes, G.The FRCPCvs. the CCFP(EM): Is there a difference 10 years after residency? CAEP Communiqué 1997;Fall:1–4.Google Scholar
2.The FRCPC vs. the CCFP(EM) [letters]. See exchange of Letters in: CAEP Communiqué 1997–98;Winter:7–13.Google Scholar
3.Etherington, J.An immodest proposal: the future of emergency medicine training in Canada. CAEP Communiqué 1997–98;Winter:16–9.Google Scholar
4.The FRCPC vs. the CCFP(EM) [letters]. See exchange of Letters in: CAEP Communiqué 1998;Spring:7–9.Google Scholar
5.Grunfeld, AF.The Task Force on Emergency Medicine Training. CAEP Communiqué 1998;Summer::1–2.Google Scholar
6.On unified EM training [letters]. See exchange of Letters in: CAEP Communiqué 1998;Summer::7–11.Google Scholar
7.Gray, S.Emergency residency training [letter]. CAEP Communiqué 1998;Fall:5.Google Scholar
8.Murray, M.CAEP’s 20th year wrapsup. CAEP Communiqué 1998–99; Winter:1–2.Google Scholar