Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:49:16.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CAEP standards: Ivory tower emergency medicine?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Samuel G. Campbell*
Affiliation:
CAEP Standards Committee, Departments of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, and Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre, Halifax, NS
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, QE II HSC, Dalhousie University, 3021-1796 Summer St., Halifax NS B3H 3A7; [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials • Éditoriaux
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

1.Green, RS, Djogovic, D, Gray, S, et al.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians sepsis guidelines: the optimal management of severe sepsis in Canadian emergency departments. CJEM 2008;10:443–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Rivers, E, Nguyen, B, Havstad, S, et al.Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–77.Google Scholar
3.Nguyen, HB, Rivers, EP, Abrahamian, FM, et al.Severe sepsis and septic shock: review of the literature and emergency department management guidelines. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:2854.Google Scholar
4.Raghavan, M, Marik, PE. Management of sepsis during the early “golden hours”. J Emerg Med 2006;31:185–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.De Miguel-Yanes, JM, Andueza-Lillo, JA, González-Ramallo, VJ, et al.Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2006;24:553–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rivers, EP, McIntyre, L, Morro, DC, et al.Early and innovative interventions for severe sepsis and septic shock: taking advantage of a window of opportunity. CMAJ 2005;173:1054–65.Google Scholar
7.Surviving Sepsis Campaign. International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2008. Crit Care Med 2008;36:296327.Google Scholar
8.CAEP Standards Committee. Terms of reference. Available: www.caep.ca/page.asp?id=6C8BB1063C594F598FABF3BFE5DD0C1C (accessed 2008 July 21).Google Scholar
9.The AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. Available: www.agreecolla boration.org (accessed 2008 July 20).Google Scholar
10.Society of Rural Physicians of Canada. Available: www.srpc.ca/(accessed 2008 July 21).Google Scholar
11.Innes, G. Thinking outside the box [editorial]. CJEM 2002;4:316.Google Scholar
12.Brothers, A. Thinking outside the box [letter]. CJEM 2002;4:387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Laroque, D. Thinking outside the box [letter]. CJEM 2002;4:387.Google Scholar