Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:34:29.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Report of the Royal Commission on Banking and Finance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

David W. Slater*
Affiliation:
Queens University
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles / Articles Critiques
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the Royal Commission on Banking and Finance (Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1964).Google Scholar

2 Tarshis, Lorie, “Money and Credit, A Review Article,” American Economic Review, 06 1962.Google Scholar Tarshis gave to the Report of the CMC a B+ when judged by “competence up to the borders of knowledge reached two decades earlier” (p. 473).

3 Milton Friedman, “An Essay in Petitio Principii,” ibid., May 1962, 291.

4 Page references set out in this way are to the Report of the Royal Commission on Banking and Finance.

5 Slater, David W., “General Economic Policy in the Report of the Royal Commission on Banking and Finance,” Canadian Banker, Summer 1964, 722 Google Scholar; and “Economic and Financial Evolution in Canada,” ibid., Autumn 1964, 5–22.

6 Johnston, Harry G., “Monetary Theory and Policy,” The American Economic Review, 06 1962, 335–84Google Scholar; the quotation is from p. 364.

7 Gurley, J. G. and Shaw, E. S., Money in a Theory of Finance (Washington, 1960).Google Scholar