Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T20:47:44.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professor Musgrave's Theory of Public Expenditures*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Gordon R. Sparks
Gordon R. Sparks*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 1964 , pp. 591 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is a project of the Research Seminar in Quantitative Economics, sponsored by National Science Foundation Grant G-13423. Discussions with Professors Harvey Brazer and Robin Barlow contributed to its development.

References

1 (New York, 1959), 80–6.

2 See Samuelson, P. A., “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditures,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVI (11 1954)Google Scholar; “Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditures,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVII (11 1955)Google Scholar; “Aspects of Public Expenditure Theories,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XL (11 1958).Google Scholar

3 Musgrave separates the functions of government into three branches: allocation of resources, distribution of income, and stabilization. See Musgrave, Theory of Public Finance, chap. I.

4 Ibid., 81.

5 Ibid., chap. II.

6 Musgrave is not technically correct when he states that the utility frontier in Samuelson's model is an envelope of utility frontiers obtained by starting from different initial distributions; all points on Musgrave's segment satisfy the possibility function. See ibid., 84 n.

7 Given n private goods, m social goods, and s individuals, the Paretian optimum conditions are obtained by maximizing the utility of one individual subject to the following s + n constraints:

(1) The utilities of the other s−1 individuals are held at some fixed levels.

(2) The output of private and social goods is constrained by a transformation function.

(3) Total consumption of each of the n private goods equals total production. The solution of this constrained maximum problem leads to s(n—1) conditions for the marginal rates of substitution between pairs of private goods and m conditions for the marginal rates of substitution between private goods and social goods. We thus have n + m + ns equations in the n + m + ns unknowns. The possibility function is an implicit function in the levels of utility of the s individuals and is obtained by solving the m + n + ns — s + 1 equations given by the constraints (2) and (3) above and the marginal conditions.

8 Musgrave, , Theory of Public Finance, 84.Google Scholar

9 Provided the production functions exhibit constant returns to scale and that the usual second order conditions, such as convexity of indifference curves, are satisfied.

10 Samuelson, , “Pure Theory of Public Expenditures,” 388.Google Scholar

11 Musgrave, , Theory of Public Finance, 84.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., 85.