Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:45:56.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VITAL DYES AS MARKERS FOR BEHAVIORAL AND POPULATION STUDIES OF THE LARCH SAWFLY, PRISTIPHORA ERICHSONII (HYMENOPTERA: TENTHREDINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. J. Heron
R. J. Heron*
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Canada Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Larvae of the larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Htg.), were fed foliage of tamarack, Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch, treated with solutions of the vital dyes, Nile blue sulphate, rhodamine B, and coriphosphine O, to determine their suitability as markers. Coriphosphine O was highly toxic at the concentrations administered but successful tagging was obtained with the other two dyes. Optimal dye retention and survival were obtained when larvae were fed for 3 days early in the last stadium using Nile blue sulphate and throughout the last stadium using rhodamine B.

Both dyes persisted throughout development and were incorporated in the cocoons and the oviposited eggs. They could be readily seen in all stages except for the cocoons and for eggs that contained rhodamine B. The dyes could be detected in cocoons by treating them with cold KOH followed by ethanol. The presence of rhodamine B in the eggs could be ascertained by its yellow fluorescence in ultraviolet.

The dyes incorporated in the cocoons are relatively stable and laboratory tests indicate they probably can withstand weathering under normal field conditions over a 1-year period.

The use of these dyes for internal marking should prove useful in studying adult dispersal and flight range and as a technique for use in population studies of the larch sawfly.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 100 , Issue 5 , May 1968 , pp. 470 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, D. E. 1966. Marking fish with dyes and other chemicals. U.S. Dept. Interior, Bur. Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Tech. Bull. 10.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. F., Eliason, D. A., and Iltis, W. G.. 1962. Some marking and recovery techniques in Culex tarsalis Coq. flight studies. Mosquito News 22: 1–10.Google Scholar
Buckner, C. H. 1968. Reactions of small mammals to vital dyes. Can. Ent. This issue.Google Scholar
Gangewere, S. K., Chavin, W., and Evans, F. G.. 1964. Methods of marking insects, with especial reference to Orthoptera (Sens. Lat.). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 662–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gast, R. T., and Landin, M.. 1966. Adult boll weevils and eggs marked with dye fed in larval diet. J. econ. Ent. 59: 474–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roer, H. 1959. Uber Flug-und Wandergewohnheiten von Pieris brassicae L. Z. angew. Ent. 44: 272–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F. 1962. Dispersal and migration. A. Rev. Ent. 7: 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods. Methuen and Co. Ltd., London. pp. 57–73.Google Scholar
Vail, P. V., Howland, A. F., and Henneberry, T. J.. 1966. Fluorescent dyes for mating and recovery studies with cabbage looper moths. J. econ. Ent. 59: 1093–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wave, H. E., Henneberry, T. J., and Mason, H. C.. 1963. Fluorescent biological stains as markers for Drosophila . J. econ. Ent. 56: 890–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharuk, R. Y. 1963. Vital dyes for marking living elaterid larvae. Can. J. Zool. 41: 991–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar