Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:30:29.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Territorial Behavior among Males of Protoxaea gloriosa (Fox) (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. A. Cazier
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
E. G. Linsley
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

In the vicinity of Douglas, Arizona, male Protoxaea gloriosa were noted establishing territories as early as July 16, 1962, although the principal emergence of both sexes occurred on July 26 and 27, following the first soaking summer rains. The territories involved flowering plants which were guarded during the morning hours, primarily between 7 a.m. and 11 a.m., against all other insect intruders except females of their own species. Guarded plants included those visited by females for nectar, or pollen, or both, as well as plants which they were not observed to visit at any time. Newly emerged females make their first flights during the morning hours in search of nectar for their own use. Male territorial behavior increases the probability of immediate mating with these virgin females. Mated females apparently lose their attractiveness to males and are allowed to visit guarded plants without interference. Such females collect pollen between 6 a.m. and 9:30 a.m., primarily from Solanum, and nectar up to about 11:30 a.m., primarily from Asclepias, Verbesina and Larrea. Male belligerence toward other bee visitors to these plants reduces actual or potential competition for pollen and/or nectar, as the case may be. After leaving their territories late in the morning, the males seek nectar for themselves, and later in the afternoon gather gregariously in large “balls” for “sleeping”, in marked contrast to their earlier intolerance of one another.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carpenter, C. R. 1958. Territoriality: a review of concepts and problems. In: Roe and Simpson, Behavior and Evolution. Yale Univ. Press, 224250.Google Scholar
Evans, H. E., and Linsley, E. G.. 1960. Notes on a sleeping aggregation of solitary bees and wasps. Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. 59: 3037.Google Scholar
Free, J. B., and Butler, C. G.. 1959. Bumblebees. Macmillan Co. 208 pp.Google Scholar
Kormondy, E. J. 1961. Territoriality and dispersal in dragonflies (Odonata). Jour. New York Ent. Soc. 69: 4252.Google Scholar
Linsley, E. G., and Michener, C. D.. 1962. Brief notes on the habits of Protoxaea (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Jour. Kansas Ent. Soc. 35: 385389.Google Scholar
Nice, M. M. 1941. The role of territory in bird life. Amer. Midland Nat. 26: 441487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truxal, F. S. 1962. Observations on nests of Oxaea (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Jour. Kansas Ent. Soc. 35: 432.Google Scholar
Watanabe, S. 1958. Territorial behavior of the carpenter bee, Xylocopa appendiculata circumvolans Smith. Seitai Konchu 7: 93. In Japanese.Google Scholar