Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:31:24.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomic review of the leek moth genus Acrolepiopsis (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Jean-François Landry
Jean-François Landry
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The North American species of Acrolepiopsis are reviewed and include six described species: A. assectella (Zeller), A. californica Gaedike, A. heppneri Gaedike, A. incertella (Chambers), A. leucoscia (Meyrick), and A. reticulosa (Braun). Acrolepiopsis liliivora Gaedike is considered a junior synonym of A. californica (new synonymy). Acrolepiopsis assectella, commonly known as the leek moth, is a recently invasive alien species in North America and a pest of the plant genus Allium, including leek, onion, garlic, and related cultivated plants. A key to species based on adults is provided, diagnostic characters including male and female genitalia are illustrated, and geographical distribution, host plants, and larval feeding pattern and damage (where known) are given. Diagnostics and illustrations are presented also for A. sapporensis (Matsumura); known as the Asiatic onion leafminer, it is very similar to A. assectella and is an invasive alien species present in Hawaii, though not in North America. Adult diagnostic characters of the genus Acrolepiopsis, the family Acrolepiidae, and the superfamily Yponomeutoidea are also provided and illustrated. DNA barcoding data (short sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene) obtained for five of the six species revealed interspecific differences averaging 8.1%, whereas intraspecific variation was ≤ 0.16%, and provided unequivocal species separation matching morphology-based identifications.

Résumé

L'auteur passe en revue les espèces d'Acrolepiopsis d'Amérique du Nord. Il reconnaît six espèces: A. assectella (Zeller), A. californica Gaedike, A. heppneri Gaedike, A. incertella (Chambers), A. leucoscia (Meyrick) et A. reticulosa (Braun). Il considère A. liliivora Gaedike comme un synonyme récent de A. californica (synonymie nouvelle). Acrolepiopsis assectella, appelée communément teigne du poireau, est une introduction récente et invasive sur le continent nord-américain, et un ravageur des ails (Allium spp.), y compris les poireaux, les oignons, l'ail et autres espèces cultivées. Il fournit un tableau d'identification des adultes, présente et illustre les caractères diagnostiques des génitalia mâles et femelles, donne la répartition géographique, les plantes nourricières et le mode d'alimentation des larves (lorsque connu). Il présente aussi les caractères diagnostiques de la mineuse asiatique de l'oignon, A. sapporensis (Matsumura), un espèce invasive à Hawaii qui n'est pas connue du continent nord-américain mais qui ressemble beaucoup à A. assectella. Il donne et illustre des caractères diagnostiques permettant de reconnaître le genre Acrolepiopsis, la famille des Acrolepiidae et la superfamille des Yponomeutoidea. Les codes-barres génétiques (de courtes séquences du gène mitochondrial de la sous-unité I de la cytochrome oxydase c), obtenus pour cinq des six espèces, présentent des différences interspécifiques de 8.1 % en moyenne, alors que la variation intraspécifique est ≤ 0.16 %, et permettent la séparation sans équivoque des espèces qui correspond à l'identification basée sur les traits morphologiques.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 139 , Issue 3 , June 2007 , pp. 319 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, D.J.L. 1996. Yponomeutidae. In The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 3. Edited by A.M. Emmet, . Harley Books, Colchester, England. pp. 39–110.Google Scholar
Callow, K., Fraser, H., and Landry, J.-F. 2003. The leek moth. An introduced pest of Allium present in Ontario and Quebec. Available from http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/leekmoth.htm [accessed 6 November 2006].Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2001–2003. Summary of plant quarantine pest and disease situations in Canada 2003: Leek moth (Acrolepiopsis assectella) [online]. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario. Available from http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/sci/surv/sit2003e.shtml#acrass [accessed 6 November 2006].Google Scholar
Carter, D.J. 1984. Pest Lepidoptera of Europe. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster.Google Scholar
Chambers, V.T. 1872. Micro-Lepidoptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 4: 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, V.T. 1873. Micro-Lepidoptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 5: 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W.X.Z., Tabashnik, B.E., Artlet, B., Malvar, T., Ballester, V., Ferre, J, and Roderic, G.K. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among geographic strains of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 90: 590–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J.F.G. 1965. Catalogue of the type specimens of Microlepidoptera in the British Museum (Natural History) described by Edward Meyrick, Vol. 5. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
Dooh, R., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2005. Canadian Barcode of Life Network. Available from http://www.bolnet.ca [accessed 7 November 2006].Google Scholar
Dugdale, J.S., Kristensen, N.P., Robinson, G.S., and Scoble, M.J. 1998. 8. The Yponomeutoidea. In Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies. Vol.1: Evolution, systematics, and biogeography. Handbuch der Zoologie / Handbook of Zoology, Vol. IV, Arthropoda: Insecta, Part 35. Edited by Kristensen, N.P.. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York. pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
Duponchel, P.-A.-J. 1842. Nocturnes. In Histoire naturelle des Lépidoptères ou Papillons de France, Supplément aux tomes 4e et suivants. Edited by Godart, J.B.. Méquignon-Marvis, Paris. pp. 1–554 + 40 pls. [51–90].Google Scholar
Dyar, H.G. 1903. A list of North American Lepidoptera and key to the literature of this order of insects. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 52 (1902): xix + 1–723.Google Scholar
Forbes, W.T.M. 1923. The Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states. Primitive forms, Microlepidoptera, Pyraloids, Bombyces. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoir 68, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Gaedike, R. 1970. Revision der paläarktischen Acrolepiidae. Entomologische Abhandlungen, 38: 1–54.Google Scholar
Gaedike, R. 1984. Revision der nearktischen und neotropischen Acrolepiidae (Lepidoptera). Entomologische Abhandlungen, 47 (1983): 179–194.Google Scholar
Gaedike, R. 1994 a. A new species of Acrolepiopsis and the description of the female of A. californica (Acrolepiidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 48(1): 46–50.Google Scholar
Gaedike, R. 1994 b. Zur Kenntnis der ostpälaarktischen Acrolepiidae (Lepidoptera). Beiträge zur Entomologie, 44: 319–328.Google Scholar
Gaedike, R. 1996. Acrolepiidae. In The Lepidoptera of Europe, a distributional checklist. Edited by Karsholt, O. and Razowski, J.. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark. pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
Gaedike, R. 1997. Acrolepiidae. Lepidopterorum Catalogus (New Series), Fasc. 55. Association for Tropical Lepidoptera and Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
Garland, J.A. 2002. Pest fact sheet — leek moth Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zeller, 1839). Bulletin of the Entomological Society of Canada, 34(3): 129–153.Google Scholar
Ghalia, A.A., and Thibout, E. 1983 a. Action du poireau (Allium porrum) sur l'activité reproductrice après la diapause imaginale chez le teigne du poireau, Acrolepiopsis assectella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 33: 188–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghalia, A.A., and Thibout, E. 1983 b. Influence des facteurs périodiques sur le développement de la teigne du poireau Acrolepiopsis assectella (Zell.) et valeur adaptative de la diapause reproductrice (Lep. Yponomeutidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 88: 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajibabaei, M., deWaard, J.R., Ivanova, N.V., Ratnasingham, S., Dooh, R.T., Kirk, S.L., Mackie, P.M., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2005. Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 360: 1959–1967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2006 a. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(4): 968–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajibabaei, M., Smith, M.A., Janzen, D.H., Rodriguez, J.J., Whitfield, J.B., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2006 b. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Molecular Ecology Notes. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01470.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handfield, L., Landry, J.-F., Landry, B. and Lafontaine, J.D. 1997. Liste des Lépidopterès du Québec et du Labrador. Fabreries Supplément 7.Google Scholar
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S., deWaard, J.R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270: 313–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinemann, H.v. 1870. Die Schmetterlinge Deutschlands und der Schweiz. Band II, Heft I.C.A. Schwetschke & Sohn, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
Heppner, J.B. 1987. Acrolepiidae (Yponomeutoidea). In Immature insects, Vol. 1. Edited by Stehr, F.W.. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
Heppner, J.B., and Duckworth, D.A. 1983. Acrolepiidae. In Check list of the Lepidoptera of America north of Mexico. Edited by Hodges, R.W., Dominick, T., Davis, D.R., Ferguson, D.C., Franclemont, J.G., Munroe, E.G., and Powell, J.A.. E.W. Classey Ltd. and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London.Google Scholar
Inoue, H. 1954. Check list of the Lepidoptera of Japan. Part 1: Micropterigidae — Phaloniidae. Rikusuisha, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Knudson, E., and Bordelon, C. 2003. Illustrations of Lepidoptera from Texas. Publication 6, Part II. Texas Lepidoptera Survey, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
Kyrki, J. 1984. The Yponomeutoidea: a reassessment of the superfamily and its suprageneric groups (Lepidoptera). Entomologica Scandinavica, 15: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyrki, J. 1990. Tentative reclassification of holarctic Yponomeutoidea. Nota Lepidopterologica, 13: 28–42.Google Scholar
Landry, J.-F., and Landry, B. 1994. A technique for setting and mounting Microlepidoptera. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 48(3): 205–227.Google Scholar
Landry, J.-F., and Parker, D.J. 2000 (June 28). Pest Identification Report No. 00-1250. Agriculture Canada, Plant Protection Division. [Unpublished.] Available from D.J. Parker, Plant Quarantine Pest, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Building 18, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.Google Scholar
Labeyrie, V. 1966. Sous-famille des Acrolepiinae. In Entomologie appliquée à l'agriculture. Traité. Tome II. Lépidoptères. Premier volume. Edited by Balachowsky, A.S.. Masson et Cie, Paris. pp. 233–249.Google Scholar
Lecomte, C. 1976. Premières observations sur la biologie et les dégâts de la teigne du poireau Acrolepiopsis (Acrolepia) assectella Zeller (Microlépidoptère Plutellidae) sur le littoral algérois. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de l'Afrique du Nord, 67: 49–56.Google Scholar
Mason, P.G., Appleby, M., Callow, K., Allen, J., Fraser, H., and Landry, J.-F. 2006. Leek moth Acrolepiopsis assectella (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) a pest of Allium spp.: biology and minor use insecticide registration. Final project report to ‘Improving Farming Systems Program’, AAFC Pest Management Centre (May 15, 2006). Available from P.G. Mason, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada; summary available from http://www.agr.gc.ca/env/pest/index_e.php?s1=min&s2=res-rech&page=insect-proj2 [accessed 6 November 2006].Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1931. 6000 illustrated insects of Japan-Empire. Tokyo. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Meyrick, E. 1927. Plutellidae. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 3(12): 357–360.Google Scholar
Moriuti, S. 1961 a. Three important species of the Acrolepia (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) in Japan. Entomological Laboratory, University of Osaka Prefecture Publication, 6: 23–33.Google Scholar
Moriuti, S. 1961 b. A new Acrolepia (Acrolepiidae) from Japan. Tyô to Ga, 12: 30–31.Google Scholar
Moriuti, S. 1964. Taxonomic notes on two Acrolepia-species of Japan. Insecta Matsumurana, 27: 35–37.Google Scholar
Moriuti, S. 1972. Seven new species of Acrolepiidae from Japan and Formosa (Lepidoptera). Kontyû, 40: 243–254.Google Scholar
Moriuti, S. 1974. A new Japanese acrolepiid (Lepidoptera). Tyô to Ga, 25: 111–112.Google Scholar
Moriuti, S. 1975. The identity of Diplodoma marginepunctella Stephens f. sapporensis Matsumura (Lepidoptera, Acrolepiidae). Kontyû, 43: 250.Google Scholar
Moriuti, S. 1982. Acrolepiidae. In Moths of Japan. Edited by Inoue, H., Sugi, S., Kuroko, H., Moriuti, S., and Kawabe, A.K.. Tokyo, Kodansha. Vol. 1, pp. 203–206; Vol. 2, pl. 8, 233, 249.Google Scholar
Pohl, G.R., Bird, C.D., Landry, J.-F., and Anweiler, G.G. 2005. New records of Microlepidoptera in Alberta, Canada. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 59(2): 61–82.Google Scholar
Poole, R.W. 1996. Nomina Insecta Nearctica. Vol. 3: Diptera, Lepidoptera, Siphonaptera. Entomological Information Services, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Ratnasingham, S., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes (OnlineEarly Articles). doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286. 2007.01678.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaltriti, G.P., and Rezzadore, G. 1982. Leek moth: biology and control prospects. Informatore Agrario, 38: 21515–21522.Google Scholar
Semenov, A.E., and Kuznetsov, V.I. 1956. Siberian onion moth Acrolepia alliella, sp. n. as a new pest of onions in the Far North. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 35: 1676–1680. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Staudinger, O., and Wocke, M.F. 1871. Catalog der Lepidopteren des Europaeischen Faunengebiets. Dr. O. Staudinger & Herman Burdach, Dresden, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibout, E. 1972. Glandes exocrines mâles et femelles intervenant dans le comportement de pariade d'Acrolepia assectella [Lépidoptère: Plutellidae]. Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.), 8: 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsingham, L. 1882. Notes on Tineidae of North America. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 10: 165–204.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, E.C. 1978. Insects of Hawaii. Vol. 9. Microlepidoptera. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar