Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:03:57.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SYSTEMATICS OF THE TRICHADENOTECNUM ALEXANDERAE SPECIES COMPLEX (PSOCOPTERA: PSOCIDAE) BASED ON AN INVESTIGATION OF MODES OF REPRODUCTION AND MORPHOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

B. W. Betz
B. W. Betz
Affiliation:
1000 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60611
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trichadenotecnum alexanderae Sommerman is shown to represent one biparental (= euphrasic) species capable of facultative parthenogenesis (thelytoky) and three uniparental (= obligatorily parthenogenetic) sibling species, as determined by tests for mating, life history observations, and morphological analysis of specimens over the geographic range of the species complex. The name T. alexanderae is restricted to the biparental species because the holotype is a male. The three uniparental species are here named and described as T. castum n. sp., T. merum n. sp., and T. innuptum n. sp. The female of T. alexanderae is redescribed to allow its separation from the three uniparental species. A key to females of the species complex is supplied. All three uniparental species were derived from the biparental ancestor of T. alexanderae. Most collections of populations represented only by females consist of one or more uniparental species. Facultative parthenogenesis is shown to maintain a population of T. alexanderae through one generation only. The biparental species is found not to be restricted geographically to a relictual or peripheral range within the species complex, but to occupy a rather wide, north-temperate distribution across eastern North America.

Résumé

Trichadenotecnum alexanderae Sommerman comprend une espèce biparentale (= euphrasique) à parthénogenèse facultative (thélytokie) et trois espèces jumelles uniparentales (= parthénogénèse obligatoire), tel que démontré par des tests d'accouplement, des observations sur le cycle vital et l'analyse morphologique de spécimens provenant de tout l'aire géographique de distribution de ce complexe d'espèces. Le nom T. alexanderae est assigné à l'espèce biparentale parce que l'holotype est un mâle. Les trois espèces uniparentales sont décrites et nommées T. castum n. sp., T. merum n. sp. et T. innuptum n. sp. La femelle du T. alexanderae est de nouveau décrite pour permettre sa distinction des trois espèces uniparentales. Une clé d'identification des femelles du complexe est présentée. Les espèces sont toutes trois dérivées de l'ancêtre biparental de T. alexanderae. La plupart des collections de populations composées uniquement de femelles représentent au moins une des espèces uniparentales. Il est démontré que la parthénogenèse facultative ne peut maintenir une population de T. alexanderae que pour une génération. L'espèce biparentale n'est pas limitée géographiquement à une partie résiduelle ou marginale de l'aire de distribution du complexe, ayant plutôt une vaste distribution tempérée-boréale, s'étendant à travers l'est de l'Amérique du nord.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 10 , October 1983 , pp. 1329 - 1354
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badonnel, A. 1951. Ordre des Psocoptères. Pages 1301–1340in Grassé, P. P., Ed., Traité de zoologie, Vol. 10, Fasc. 2. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Betz, B. W. 1983 a. The biology of Trichadenotecnum alexanderae Sommerman (Psocoptera: Psocidae). I. Habitat, Life stages and events. Ent. News (in press).Google Scholar
Betz, B. W. 1983 b. The biology of Trichadenotecnum alexanderae Sommerman (Psocoptera: Psocidae). II. Duration of biparental and parthenogenetic reproductive abilities. J. Kans. ent. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
Betz, B. W. 1983 c. The biology of Trichadenotecnum alexanderae Sommerman (Psocoptera: Psocidae). III. Analysis of mating behavior. Psyche, Camb. (in press).Google Scholar
Betz, B. W. 1983 d. The biology of Trichadenotecnum alexanderae Sommerman (Psocoptera: Psocidae). IV. Mechanism of genitalic coupling. J. Kans. ent. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
Broadhead, E. 1954. A new parthenogenetic psocid from stored products, with observations on parthenogenesis in other psocids. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 90: 10–16.Google Scholar
Dunham, R. S. 1972. A life history study of Caecilius aurantiacus (Hagen) (Psocoptera: Caeciliidae). Great Lakes Ent. 5: 17–27.Google Scholar
Eertmoed, G. E. 1966. The life history of Peripsocus quadrifasciatus (Psocoptera: Peripsocidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 39: 54–65.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1909. Neue Gattungen und Arten nordamerikanischer Copeognathen. Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici 3: 329–339.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. 1924. Copeognathen. Pages 34–37in Dampf, A. (Ed.), Zur Kenntnis der Estlandischen Moorfauna. II. Sber. Ges. naturf. Jurjew 31.Google Scholar
Lienhard, C. 1977. Die Psocopteren des Schweizerischen Nationalparks und seiner Umgebung (Insecta: Psocoptera). Nationalpark 14: 417–551.Google Scholar
Mockford, E. L. 1971. Parthenogenesis in psocids (Insecta: Psocoptera). Am. Zoologist 11: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mockford, E. L. 1979. Diagnoses, distribution, and comparative life history notes on Aaroniella maculosa (Aaron) and A. eertmoedi n. sp. (Psocoptera: Philotarsidae). Great Lakes Ent. 12: 35–44.Google Scholar
New, T. R. and Loan, C. C.. 1972. Psocoptera collected near Belleville, Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 102: 16–23.Google Scholar
Nyholm, T. 1953. Zur Kenntnis der Copeognathenfauna Schwedens. 2. Die schwedischen Arten der Gattung Trichadenotecnum End. sensu Roesler. Ark. Zool. (Stockholm) (N.S.) 4: 297–302.Google Scholar
Pearman, J. V. 1928. Biological observations on some British Psocoptera. III. Sex behavior. IV. Miscellaneous. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 64: 263–268.Google Scholar
Roesler, R. 1943. Über einige Copeognathengenera. Stettin. ent. Zgt. 104: 1–14.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. 1955. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über Parthenogenese und Entwicklungsrhythmen bei einheimischen Psocopteren. Biol. Zentr. 74: 273–310.Google Scholar
Smithers, C. N. 1969. On a small collection of Psocoptera from Britain. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 105: 54.Google Scholar
Sommerman, K. M. 1948. Two new Nearctic psocids of the genus Trichadenotecnum with a nomenclatural note on a third species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 50: 165–173.Google Scholar
Thornton, I. W. B. 1961. The Trichadenotecnum group (Psocoptera: Psocidae) in Hong Kong with descriptions of new species. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, I. W. B. and Wong, Siu Kai. 1968. The peripsocid fauna (Psocoptera) of the Oriental Region and the Pacific. Pacif. Insects Monogr. 19. 158 pp.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. 1978. Modes of Speciation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1975. Sex and Evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey.Google ScholarPubMed