Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:11:55.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SURVIVAL OF EUROPEAN PINE SHOOT MOTH, RHYACIONIA BUOLIAINA (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE), UNDER CAGED CONDITIONS IN A PONDEROSA PINE FOREST

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. E. Daterman  and
V. M. Carolin Jr.
G. E. Daterman
Affiliation:
Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon
V. M. Carolin Jr.
Affiliation:
Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European pine shoot moth developed successfully on native lodgepole and ponderosa pines at central Oregon locations. Lodgepole and slow-growing ponderosa pine less than 6 ft in height were most susceptible to damage. Largely because of low winter temperatures, interior British Columbia, northern Washington, northeastern Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, and the Dakotas are not likely to experience Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) damage. In contrast, southern Oregon and northern California pine stands are highly susceptible.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 7 , July 1973 , pp. 929 - 940
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carolin, V. M. and Baxter, J. W.. 1968. Bud characteristics of ponderosa pine related to potential damage by the European pine shoot moth. Forest Res. Notes Pacif. NW. Forest Exp. Stn PNW 90.Google Scholar
Chawla, S. S. and Harwood, R. F.. 1968. Artificial diets for the European pine shoot moth Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Wash. Agric. Exp. Stn tech. Bull. 59.Google Scholar
Critchfield, W. B. and Little, E. L. Jr., 1966. Geographic distribution of the pines of the world. U.S. Dep. Agric. Forest Service. Misc. Publ. 991.Google Scholar
Daterman, G. E. 1969. Easy recognition of mated females of the European pine shoot moth. J. econ. Ent. 62: 527–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daterman, G. E. 1970. An improved technique for mating European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) in the laboratory. Can. Ent. 102: 541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daterman, G. E. 1972. Effects of high temperature and vapor pressure deficit on European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae), egg production and survival. Can. Ent. 104: 1387–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, W. 1928. Notes on economic insects on Vancouver Island in 1927. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 25: 16–18.Google Scholar
Flora, D. F. 1965. Economic evaluation of potential European pine shoot moth damage in the ponderosa pine region. Forest Res. Notes Pacif. NW. Forest Exp. Stn PNW 22.Google Scholar
Furniss, R. L. 1962. Has the shoot moth taught us a lesson? Forest Wld 1: 42–46.Google Scholar
Graham, S. A. and Baumhofer, L. G.. 1930. Susceptibility of young pines to tip moth injury. J. For. 28: 54–65.Google Scholar
Green, G. W. 1962 a. Low winter temperatures and the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) in Ontario. Can. Ent. 94: 314–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. W. 1962 b. Flight and dispersal of the European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.). I. Factors affecting flight, and the flight potential of females. Can. Ent. 94: 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. 1960. Production of pine resin and its effect on survival of Rhyaconia buoliana (Schiff.) (Lepidoptera:Olethreutidae). Can. J. Zool. 38: 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkenen, H. J. and Miller, W. E.. 1960. European pine shoot moth damage as related to red pine growth. U.S. Dep. Agric. Forest Serv. Lake St. Forest Exp. Stn Pap. 83.Google Scholar
Holst, M. and Heimburger, C.. 1955. The breeding of hard pine types resistant to the European pine shoot moth (Rhyacionia buoliana Schiff.). For. Chron. 31: 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincer, J. B. 1928. Atlas of American Agriculture. Pt. 2, Climate. Sect. B, Temperature, sunshine, and wind. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bur. Agric. Econ.Google Scholar
Mason, R. R. 1971. Soil moisture and stand density affect oleoresin exudation flow in a loblolly pine plantation. Forest Sci. 17: 170–177.Google Scholar
Miller, W. E. 1967. The European pine shoot moth — ecology and control in the Lake States. Forest Sci. Monogr. 14.Google Scholar
Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission. 1969. Climatological Handbook Columbia Basin States. Vol. 1, Pt. A, Temperature, pp. 64–76. Vol. 2, Precipitation, pp. 179–192.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. A. 1951. A comparison of the climate in four ponderosa pine regions. J. For. 49: 256–258.Google Scholar
Schröder, D. 1966. Zur Kenntnis der systematik und Okologie der “Evetria” Arten (Lep., Tortricidae). Z. angew. Ent. 57: 333–429; 58: 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1967. Distribution of European pine shoot moth (Rhyacionia buoliana). Co-op. Econ. Insect Rep. 17. p. 320.Google Scholar