Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:13:10.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPRING FLIGHT AND ADULT ACTIVITY OF THE WHITE PINE WEEVIL, PISSODES STROBI (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE), ON SITKA SPRUCE IN WESTERN WASHINGTON1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. L. Overhulser
Affiliation:
College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle
R. I. Gara
Affiliation:
College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle

Abstract

Observations were made on the flight patterns, sex ratios, and ovipositional activity of Pissodes strobi in Sitka spruce. There is an aggregation of adults on spruce leaders early in the flight season during which sexual maturation and mating take place. Males are more active early in the flight season, while females are more numerous during the latter half of the flight season.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, T. C. 1928 (unpub.). A biological study of the white-pine weevil with special reference to anatomy, flight, phenology, parasitism, behavior and injury to young trees. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard Univ. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. L. 1971 (unpub.). Behavior of the Sitka spruce weevil, Pissodes sitchensis Hopkins (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in southwestern Washington. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Washington, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Dirks, C. O. 1964. The white pine weevil in Maine—its biology and dispersal and the effect of prompt clipping of infested leaders on trunk form. Bull. Univ. Maine, No. 625. 23 pp.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I., Carlson, R. L., and Hrutfiord, B. F.. 1971. Influence of some physical and host factors on the behavior of the Sitka spruce weevil in southwestern Washington. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 467471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, P. A., Jaynes, H. A., and Davis, J. M.. 1957. The dispersion of radioactively tagged white pine weevils in small plantations. J. econ. Ent. 50: 264266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. A. 1926. The biology and control of the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi Peck. Bull. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 449. 32 pp.Google Scholar
Harman, D. M. and Kulman, H. M.. 1966. A technique for sexing live white-pine weevils, Pissodes strobi. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 315317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, D. M. and Kulman, H. M.. 1967. Flight and dispersal of the white-pine weevil. J. econ. Ent. 60: 16821688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacAloney, H. J. 1925 (unpub.). Preliminary observations on the control of the white-pine weevil injury by forest management. Masters Thesis, N.Y. State Coll. of Forestry. 57 pp.Google Scholar
Peirson, H. B. 1922. Control of the white-pine weevil by forest management. Harvard Forest Bull. 5.Google Scholar
Silver, G. T. 1968. Studies on the Sitka spruce weevil. Can. Ent. 100: 93110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, K. H. 1960. Sitka spruce weevil. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Pest Leafl. 47. 6 pp.Google Scholar
Wright, K. H. and Baisinger, D. H.. 1955. The silvicultural importance of the Sitka spruce weevil in coastal Oregon and Washington. Proc. Soc. Am. For.: 6467.Google Scholar