Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:20:01.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEX PHEROMONE COMPONENTS OF ENARMONIA FORMOSANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Crawford McNair ,
Gerhard Gries  and
Regine Gries
Crawford McNair
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A IS6
Gerhard Gries*
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A IS6
Regine Gries
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A IS6
*
1Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

(E)-9-Dodecenyl acetate (E9-12:OAc) and (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate (Z9-12:OAc) are major components of the sex pheromone of the cherry bark tortrix (CBT), Enarmonia formosana (Scopoli), in British Columbia. The compounds were identified in extracts of female pheromone glands by coupled gas chromatographic – electroantennographic detection (GC–EAD) and coupled GC – mass spectrometry. In field experiments, traps baited with E9-12:OAc or Z9-12:OAc singly were unattractive to male CBT, but in combination at ratios of 50:50 or 40:60 captured numerous males. Increasing quantities of this two-component pheromone blend resulted in increasing captures of male CBT. This binary blend at a 10-mg dose caught more CBT males that did caged virgin CBT females. Eight other EAD-active acetates identified in extracts of pheromone glands failed to enhance attractiveness of the pheromone blend. These compounds may serve to reduce cross-attraction of heterospecific male moths or may play a role in courtship behaviour. Formulations of synthetic pheromone are being evaluated for management of the CBT using mass trapping or disorientation of male CBT moths.

Résumé

L’acétate de (E)-9-dodécényl (E9-12 : OAc) et l’acétate de (Z)-9-dodécényl (Z9-12 : OAc) sont les principales composantes de la phéromone sexuelle chez la tordeuse Enarmonia formosana (Scopoli) en Colombie-Britannique. Ces substances ont été identifiées dans des extraits de glandes à phéromone de femelles par une technique combinant chromatographic en phase gaseuse et détection par électroantennographie (GC-EAD) et par combinaison chromatographie en phase gaseuse – spectrométrie de masse. Dans des expériences sur le terrain, des pièges garnis de E9-12 : OAC seul ou de Z9-12 : OAC seul n’ont pas attiré de mâles de la tordeuse, mais les deux substances combinées dans des proportions de 50 : 50 ou 40 : 60 ont attiré de nombreux mâles. Une augmentation des quantités de ce mélange a donné lieu à des captures encore plus nombreuses de mâles de la tordeuse. Une dose de 10-mg de ce mélange à deux composantes a attiré plus de mâles que la présence de femelles vierges en cage. L’addition de l’un ou l’autre des huit acétates identifiés par GC-EAD dans les extraits de glandes à phéromone n’a pas augmenté le pouvoir d’attraction du mélange. Ces substances servent peut-être à réduire l’attraction d’autres mâles hétérospécifiques ou ont peut-être un rôle à jouer dans le comportement de cour. L’efficacité de diverses phéromones synthétiques dans la lutte contre cette tordeuse par piégeage en masses ou comme agents de désorientation des mâles est actuellement à l’étude.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 131 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 85 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, D.V. 1978. Observations on the specificity of pheromone-baited traps for Cydia funebrana (Treitschke) Lepidoptera, Tortricidae. Bulletin of Entomological Research 68: 97–103.Google Scholar
Arn, H., Städler, E., and Rauscher, S.. 1975. The electroantennographic detector—a selective and sensitive tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung Section C Biosciences 30: 722–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arn, H., Tóth, M., and Priesner, E.. 1992. List of Sex Pheromones of Lepidoptera and Related Attractants. 2nd ed. International Organisation for Biological Control, Montfavet, France.Google Scholar
Biwer, G., Descoins, C., Gallois, M., Priesner, E., Chambon, J.-P., Genestier, G., and Martinez, M.. 1977. Étude de la sécrétion phéromonale de la femelle vierge de la Tordeuse des céréales: Cnephasia pumicana Zeller (Lépidoptère, Tortricidae). Annales de Zoologie, Ecologie animale 10: 129–138.Google Scholar
Brewer, J.W., Krampl, F., and Skuhravý, V.. 1985. Forest Lepidoptera attracted to six synthetic pheromones in Czechoslovakia. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 100: 372–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, P.T., and Parker, D.J.. 1990. First records of Enarmonia formosana in North America (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 87: 3–6.Google Scholar
Dunkelblum, E., Tan, S.H., and Silk, P.J.. 1985. Double-bond location in monounsaturated fatty acids by dimethyl disulphide derivation and mass spectrometry: application to analysis of fatty acids in pheromone glands of four lepidoptera. Journal of Chemical Ecology 11: 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, C.R., Bierl-Leonhardt, B.A., McLaughlin, J.R., and Plimmer, J.R.. 1980. Air permeation tests with (Z,Z)-3,13-octadecadien-1-ol acetate for reduction in trap catch of peachtree and lesser peachtree borer moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 7: 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, T.G., Slessor, K.N., Shepherd, R.F., Grant, G.G., and Manville, J.F.. 1984. European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): identification of additional pheromone components resulting in an improved lure. The Canadian Entomologist 116: 1525–1532.Google Scholar
Hrdy, I., Marek, J., and Krampl, F.. 1979. Sexual pheromone activity of 8-dodecenyl and 11-tetradecenyl acetates for males of several lepidopteran species in field trials. Acta entomologica bohemoslovaca 76: 65–83.Google Scholar
Klaus, M. 1992. Cherry Bark Tortrix Survey Report. Washington State Department of Agriculture, Yakima, WA.Google Scholar
Lin, G., Guo, G., Wu, Y., Wu, B., Liu, L., Zhou, W., Li, L., and Dong, H.. 1984. Multiple sex pheromone of Ancylis sativa. Kexue Tongbao 29: 1670–1674.Google Scholar
McNair, C., Gries, G., and Sidney, M.. 1999. Toward pheromone-based mating disruption Enarmonia formosana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on ornamental cherry trees. The Canadian Entomologist 131: 97–105.Google Scholar
Minks, A.K., Voerman, S., and van de Vrie, M.. 1976. A sex attractant for the cherry-bark tortrix moth, Enarmonia formosana. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 19: 301–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. 1956. Untersuchungen über den Rindenwickler Enarmonia woeberiana Schiff. (Lepid. Tortr.) Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 38: 295–321.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.11 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Sermann, H., and Zahn, H.. 1986. Untersuchungen zur Autökologie des Rindenwicklers (Enarmonia formosana Scop.). Nachrichtenblatt für den Pflanzenschutz in der DDR 40: 128–132.Google Scholar
Sziráki, G. 1984. Dispersion and movement activity of some important moth pests living on stone fruits. Acta Pathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 19: 51–64.Google Scholar
Whittle, C.P., Bellas, T.E., Horak, M., and Pinese, B.. 1987. The sex pheromone and taxonomic status of Homona spargotis Meyrick sp.rev., an Australian pest species of the Coffeearia group (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 26: 169–179.Google Scholar
Winfield, A.L. 1964. The biology and control of the cherry-bark tortrix moth. Plant Pathology 13: 115–120.Google Scholar