Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-01T09:16:43.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A SEX ATTRACTANT FOR THE COTTONWOOD CROWN BORER, AEGERIA TIBIALIS (LEPIDOPTERA: SESIIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

E. W. Underhill ,
W. Steck ,
M. D. Chisholm ,
H. A. Worden  and
J. A. G. Howe
E. W. Underhill
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W9
W. Steck
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W9
M. D. Chisholm
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W9
H. A. Worden
Affiliation:
PFRA Tree Nursery, Department of Regional Economic Expansion, Indian Head, Saskatchewan S0G 2K0
J. A. G. Howe
Affiliation:
PFRA Tree Nursery, Department of Regional Economic Expansion, Indian Head, Saskatchewan S0G 2K0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Male moths of Aegeria tibialis Harris, a lepidopterous pest of poplar cutting beds in nurseries, were strongly attracted to virgin females and to mixtures of Z3, Z13-octadecadien-1-ol and its acetate. Extracts of female abdominal tips yielded two fractions stimulatory to male antennae. These fractions corresponded to a C18 alcohol and a C18 acetate. Electroantennogram measurements using synthetic chemicals demonstrated that appreciable male antennal stimulation occurred only with C18 compounds having Z-unsaturation at positions 3 or 13, indicating that the synthetic sex attractant may be the natural pheromone of this species.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 5 , 01 May 1978 , pp. 495 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chisholm, M.D., Steck, W.F., Arthur, A.P., and Underhill, E. W.. 1975. Evidence for cis-11-hexadecen-1-ol acetate as a major component of the sex pheromone of the bertha armyworm. Can. Ent. 107: 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houx, N.W.H., Voerman, S., and Jongen, W.M.F.. 1974. Purification and analysis of synthetic insect sex attractants by liquid chromatography on a silver-loaded resin. J. Chromatog. 96: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochansky, J., Tette, J., Taschenberg, E.F., Carde, R.T., Kaissling, K.E., and Roelofs, W.L.. 1975. Sex pheromone of the moth Antheraea polyphemus. J. Insect Physiol. 21: 1977–1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, D.G., Purrington, F.F., Tumlinson, J.H., Doolittle, R.E., and Yonce, C.E.. 1975. Response of male clearwing moths to caged virgin females, female extracts and synthetic sex attractants. Environ. Ent. 4, 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumlinson, J.H., Yonce, C.E., Doolittle, R.E., Heath, R.R., Gentry, C.R., and Mitchell, E.R.. 1974. Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation of the lesser peach tree borer and the peach tree borer. Science 185: 614–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worden, H.A. and Peterson, L.O.T.. 1962. Summary Report, Forest Nursery Station, Indian Head, Sask.17 pp.Google Scholar
Worden, H.A. 1974. Annual Report of the Tree Nursery, PFRA, Indian Head, Sask. 42 pp.Google Scholar