Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:52:05.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SECOND CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC AMBER ZYGENTOMA (INSECTA): FAMILY LEPISMATIDAE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Luis F. Mendes
Luis F. Mendes
Affiliation:
Centro de Zoologia do Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical, R. da Junqueira 14, P-1300 Lisboa, Portugal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ctenolepisma (C.) electrans sp.n., from the Dominican amber, is described and compared with the closest living species. The new taxon is the only Lepismatidae known so far in the Dominican Republic amber and corresponds to the only known fossil Ctenolepisma.

Résumé

Ctenolepisma (C.) electrans sp.n., de l’ambre Dominicain, est décrite et comparée avec les espèces plus voisines. La nouvelle espèce est le seul Lepismatidae trouvé dans l’ambre de la Republique Dominicaine et correspond à l’unique Ctenolepisma fossile connue.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 130 , Issue 6 , December 1998 , pp. 899 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dufour, L.J. 1831. Description et figures de deux espèces nouvelles du genre Lepisma. Annales des Sciences Naturelles (Zoologie) 22: 419–421.Google Scholar
Escherich, K. 1905. Das System der Lepismatiden. Zoologica Stuttgart 43 (18): 1–164.Google Scholar
Irish, J. 1987. Revision of the genus Ctenolepisma Escherich (Thysanura: Lepismatidae) in Southern Africa. Cimbebasia Series A 27 (11): 147–207.Google Scholar
Irish, J. 1994. Biogeography and systematics of southern African Lepismatidae (Thysanura, Insecta). I. The Orange Free State. Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum (Bloemfontein) 10 (11): 453–496.Google Scholar
Kaplin, V.G. 1985. New species of thysanuran of the genus Ctenolepisma Esch. (Thysanura, Lepismatidae) from Eastern Karakum. Izvestia Akademii Nauk Turkmenskoi SSR 6: 64–65. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Kaplin, V.G. 1993. On systematics and phylogeny of the genera Ctenolepisma and Sceletolepisma stat.n.(Thysanura, Lepismatidae). Zoologcheskii Zhurnal 72 (7): 34–51. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Mendes, L.F. 1978. Notas sobre o género Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma, Lepismatidae) em Portugal. Arquivos do Museu Bocage (2) 6 (16): 279–298.Google Scholar
Mendes, L.F. 1981. Nova nota e descrições de tisanuros (Microcoryphia e Zygentoma: Apterygota) da Macaronésia. Arquivos do Museu Bocage Serie A 1 (9): 143–164.Google Scholar
Mendes, L.F. 1982. Notas e descrições de Lepismatidae afrotropicais (Zygentoma: Apterygota). II. Géneros Ctenolepisma e Namunukulina. Revue de Zoologie Africaine 96 (3): 591–661.Google Scholar
Mendes, L.F. 1985. Notas e descrições de Lepismatideos afrotropicais (Zygentoma: Apterygota). III. Tisanuros da Guiné-Bissau. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia 3 (2) (72): 1–33.Google Scholar
Mendes, L.F. 1988. A survey of the Lepismatidae (Insecta, Zygentoma) from Sar Uanle (Somalia). Tropical Zoology 1 (1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, L.F. 1991. On the phylogeny of the genera of Lepismatidae (Insecta: Zygentoma). pp. 1–13in Veeresh, G.K., Rajagopal, J., and Viraktamath, C.A. (Eds.), Advances in Management and Conservation of Soil Fauna. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Mendes, L.F. 1997. First contribution to the study of the dominican amber Zygentoma (Insecta). Family Ateluridae. Pedobiologia 41: 40–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paclt, J. 1967. Thysanura. Fam. Lepidotrichidae, Maindroniidae, Lepismatidae. Genera Insectorum Crainhem 218: 1–86.Google Scholar
Parona, C. 1892. Di alcuni tisanuri e collembola della Birmania raccolti da Leonardo Fea. Atti della Societá Italiana di Scienze Naturali 34: 123–135.Google Scholar
Poinar, G.O. Jr. 1993. Insects in amber. Annual Review of Entomology 46: 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramón-Martinez, S., and Schlee, D.. 1984. Die Dominikanischen Bernsteinminen der Nordkordillere, speziell auch der Sicht der Werkstäten. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie C 18: 79–84.Google Scholar
Schlee, D. 1984. Besonderheiten des Dominikanischen Bernsteins. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie C 18: 63–71.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1908. Tisanuri raccolti da L. Fea alle isole del Capo Verde, alla Guinea portoghese e alle isole S. Thome, Principe e Fernando Poo. Annali del Museo civico di Storia naturale di Genova (3) 4 (44): 133–187.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1912. Die Thysanuren der baltischen Bernsteins. Schriften der Physikalisch-öekonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg 53: 42–66.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1932. Spedizione scientifica all'oasis di Cufra (Marzo/Juglio 1931). Thysanura. Annali del Museo civico di Storia naturale di Genova 55: 293–301.Google Scholar
Wygodzinsky, P. 1957. LXXXVII. Thysanura. pp. 79–87in Basilewsky, P., and Leleup, N. (Eds.), Mission Zoologique de I'IRSAC en Afrique Orientale (1957). Annales du Musee royale de l'Afrique Centrale, Series 8, Zoologie 138.Google Scholar
Wygodzinsky, P. 1959. Thysanura and Machilida of the Lesser Antilles and northern South America. Studies on the fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean islands 9 (36): 28–49.Google Scholar