Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:28:42.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal dynamics of Urophora quadrifasciata on spotted knapweed in the Arkansas Ozarks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Dagne Duguma
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, 319 Agriculture Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, United States of America
Timothy J. Kring*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, 319 Agriculture Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, United States of America
Robert N. Wiedenmann
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, 319 Agriculture Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Periodic sweep-net sampling and capitula sampling were conducted between April and October 2007 to determine the seasonal phenology of Urophora quadrifasciata (Meigen) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on spotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe subsp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek (Asteraceae), in the Arkansas Ozarks of the United States of America. Urophora quadrifasciata produces up to three generations in Arkansas, rather than being bivoltine as in the northern United States of America. The first, second, and third generations of U. quadrifasciata reached peak adult numbers around 26 May, 29 June, and 27 July, respectively. Males tended to emerge earlier than females but the female:male ratio was approximately 1:1 for most of the season. The majority of the offspring of the three generations emerged between June and October, while approximately 38% entered diapause and emerged as adults in April-June of the following year; 3.4 ± 0.1 (mean ± SE) (range 1–12) flies emerged from each infested capitulum. The absence of other, competing knapweed biological control agents as well as very low rates of parasitism, mild weather conditions, and a longer knapweed growing season likely contributed to the adaptation and establishment of U. quadrifasciata on spotted knapweed in Arkansas.

Résumé

Des récoltes périodiques au filet fauchoir et des prélèvements sur les capitules d’avril à octobre 2007 nous ont permis de déterminer la phénologie saisonnière d’Urophora quadrifasciata (Meigen) (Diptera: Tephritidae) sur la centaurée maculée, Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek (Asteraceae), dans les Ozarks de l’Arkansas aux États-Unis. Urophora quadrifasciata produit jusqu’à trois générations en Arkansas, alors qu’il est bivoltin dans le nord des États-Unis. Les première, seconde et troisième générations d’U. quadrifasciata atteignent leur densité maximale d’adultes respectivement autour du 26 mai, du 29 juin et du 27 juillet. Les mâles ont tendance à émerger plus tôt que les femelles, mais le rapport femelles:mâles est de ~1:1 durant la plus grande partie de la saison. La plupart des rejetons des trois générations d’U. quadrifasciata émergent de juin à octobre, alors que ~38 % d’entre eux entrent en diapause et émergent à l’état adulte en avril-juin de l’année suivante. En moyenne, 3,4 ± 0,1 mouches (étendue: 1–12) émergent de chaque capitule infesté. L’absence de compétition par d’autres agents de lutte biologique de la centaurée, de même qu’un parasitisme très faible, des conditions météorologiques clémentes et une saison de croissance prolongée de la centaurée, ont contribué vraisemblablement à l’adaptation et l’établissement d’U. quadrifasciata sur la centaurée maculée en Arkansas.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berube, D.E. 1980. Interspecific competition between Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae) for ovipositional sites on diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa: Compositae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 90: 299306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, B., and Zwölfer, H. 2002. Macro-evolutionary tradeoffs in the tephritid genus Urophora: benefits and costs of an improved plant gall. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4: 6177.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1980. Establishment of Urophora affinis Frauenfeld and U. quadrifasciata Meigen (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Canada for the biological control of diffuse and spotted knapweed. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 89: 504514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P., and Shorthouse, J.D. 1996. Effectiveness of gall inducers in weed biological control. The Canadian Entomologist, 128: 10211055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, A. 2004. Assessment of insects, primarily impacts of biological control and their parasitoids associated with spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe L. s. l.) in eastern Tennessee. MS thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Lang, R.F., Richard, R.D., Parker, P.E., and Wendel, L. 2000. Release and establishment of diffuse and spotted knapweed biocontrol agents by USDA, APHIS, PPQ, in the United States. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 76: 197218.Google Scholar
Lang, R.F., Winkler, J., and Hansen, R.W. 2003. Attack of U. quadrifasciata (Meig.) a biological control agent for spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa Lamarck) and diffuse knapweed (C. diffusa) (Asteraceae) by a parasitoid, Pteromalus sp. (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) in Michigan. The Great Lakes Entomologist, 36: 1624.Google Scholar
Marshall, J.M., and Storer, A.J. 2006. Influence of Centaurea biebersteinii patch size on Urophora quadrifasciata (Dipt. Tephritidae) in Michigan, USA. Journal of Applied Entomology, 130: 9195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J.M., Burks, R.A., and Storer, A.J. 2004. First host record for Pteromalus cardui (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) on Urophora quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in spotted knapweed (Centaurea biberstenii, Asteraceae) in Michigan. Entomological News, 115: 273278.Google Scholar
Mays, W.T., and Kok, L.T. 2003. Population dynamics and dispersal of two exotic biological control agents of spotted knapweed, Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae), in southwestern Virginia from 1986 to 2000. Biological Control, 27: 4352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minteer, C. 2007. Centaurea stoebe subsp. micranthos (spotted knapweed) [Asteraceae] an invasive species in southern Ozarks: infested vs. non-infested sites and a ploidy level study. MS thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.Google Scholar
Myers, J.H., and Harris, P. 1980. Distribution of Urophora galls in flower heads of diffuse and spotted knapweed in British Colombia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 17: 359367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowierski, R.M., Story, J.M., and Lund, R.E. 1987. Two-level numerical sampling plans and optimal sub sample size computations for Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Tephritidae) on spotted knapweed. Environmental Entomology, 16: 933937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowierski, R.M., Fitzgerald, B.C., McDermott, G.J., and Story, J.M. 2000. Overwintering mortality of Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae) on spotted knapweed: effects of larval competition versus exposure to subzero temperatures. Environmental Entomology, 29: 403412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieder, J.P., Evans, E.W., and Durham, S.L. 2001. Distribution of insect attacks in biological control of weeds: infestation of Centaurea virgata flower heads by a gall fly. Biological Control, 20: 254260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2007. JMP 7 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Seastedt, T.R., Knochel, D.G., Garmoe, M., and Shosky, S.A. 2007. Interactions and effects of multiple biological control insects on diffuse and spotted knapweed in the Front Range of Colorado. Biological Control, 42: 345354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. 2008. National Soil Survey characterization data [online]. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Soil Survey Laboratory Lincoln, Nebraska. Available from http://ssldata.nrcs.usda.gov [accessed 31 July 2008].Google Scholar
Story, J.M. 1985. First report on the dispersal into Montana of Urophora quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae), a fly released in Canada for biological control of spotted knapweed and diffuse knapweed. The Canadian Entomologist, 117: 10611062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, J.M., Boggs, K.W., Good, W.R., Harris, P., and Nowierski, R.M. 1991. Metzneria paucipunctella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a moth introduced against spotted knapweed: its feeding strategy and impact on two introduced Urophora spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 123: 10011007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, J.M., Boggs, K.W., and Good, W.R. 1992. Voltinism and phenological synchrony of Urophora affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae), two seed head flies introduced against spotted knapweed in Montana. Environmental Entomology, 21: 10521059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, J.M., Boggs, K.W., and Good, W.R. 1993. Super-cooling capacity of U. affinis and U. quadrifasciata (Diptera: Tephritidae), two seed head flies introduced against spotted knapweed in Montana. Environmental Entomology, 22: 831836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, J.M., Boggs, K.W., Good, W.R., White, L.J., and Nowierski, R.M. 1995. Cause and extent of predation on Urophora spp. larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in spotted knapweed capitula. Environmental Entomology, 24: 14671472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Story, J.M., Smith, L., Corn, J.G., and White, L.J. 2008. Influence of seed head-attacking biological control agents on spotted knapweed reproductive potential in western Montana over a 30 year period. Biological Control, 37: 520529.Google Scholar
White, I.M., and Korneyev, V.A. 1989. A revision of the western Palaearctic species of Urophora Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Tephritidae). Systematic Entomology, 14: 327374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zouhar, K. 2001. Centaurea maculosa. In Fire effects information system [online]. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [accessed 14 November 2007].Google Scholar