Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:11:02.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SCOLYTID PHEROMONES — READY OR NOT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. D. Atkins
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry and Rural Development, Victoria, British Columbia

Abstract

Several of what may be a lengthy series of bark-beetle pheromones have recently been identified. The availability of these substances will provide new ways to control and manipulate populations. Some of the dangers inherent in the use of such chemicals, without adequate information on the biology, behavior, and genetics of the species to be manipulated, are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atltins, M. D. 1966 a. Behavioural variation among scolytids in relation to their habitat. Can. Ent. 98: 285288.Google Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1966 b. Laboratory studies on the behaviour of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins. Can. Ent. 98: 953991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1967. The effect of rearing temperature on the size and fat content of the Douglas-fir beetle. Can. Ent. 99: 181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedard, W. D. 1966. Variation in capacity of Ips confusus to reach attractive hosts. Breeding pest-resistant trees. Pergamon Press. pp. 137142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1967. Response behaviour of scolytid beetles and odour meteorology. Can. Ent. 99: 11321137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gara, R. I., Vité, J. P., and Cramer, H. H.. 1965. Manipulation of Dendroctonus frontalis by use of a population aggregating pheromone. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. P1. Res. 23(3): 5566.Google Scholar
Hopping, G. R. 1962. The sex ratios in Ips tridens (Mannerheim) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 94: 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopping, G. R. 1963. The breeding evidence indicating two genetic types of females of Ips tridens (Mannerheim) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 96: 117118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, T., and Takagi, K.. 1965. Biology of some scolytid ambrosia beetles attacking tea plants. IV. Parthenogenesis of Xyleborus germanus Blan. in relation to the Germanus ambrosia fungus. Jap. J. appl. Ent. Zool. 9: 303304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E. F., and McGuire, J. U. Jr., 1966. Population models to test theoretical effects of sex attractants used for insect control. Agric. Information Bull. No. 308. U.S.D.A. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lanier, G. N. 1966. Interspecific mating and cytological studies of closely related species of Ips DeGeer and Orthotomicus Ferrari (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Can. Ent. 98: 175188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, G. B., Vité, J. P., Kinzer, G. W., and Fentiman, A. F. Jr., 1968. Bark beetle attractants: Trans – Verbenol isolated from Dendroctonus. Nature 218: 168169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, J. A. A. 1967. Identification of two oxygenated terpenes from the bark beetles Dendroctonus frontalis and Dendroctonus brevicomis. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 23: 355360.Google Scholar
Silverstein, R. M., Rodin, J. O., and Wood, D. L. 1966. Sex attractants in frass produced by male Ips confusus in ponderosa pine. Science 154: 509510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, R. M. et al. , 1968. Brevicomin: Principal sex attractant in the frass of the female western pine beetle. Science 159: 889891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellington, W. G. 1957. Individual differences as a factor in population dynamics: the development of a problem. Can. J. Zool. 35: 293323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1960. Qualitative changes in natural populations during changes in abundance. Can. J. Zool. 38: 289314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1964. Qualitative changes in populations in unstable environments. Can. Ent. 96: 436451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar