Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:43:55.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the New World lygaeoid genus Epipolops (Heteroptera: Geocoridae: Pamphantinae: Epipolopini), with descriptions of five new species1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Thomas J. Henry
Thomas J. Henry
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, ARS, United States Department of Agriculture, c/o National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, MRC-0168, Washington, D.C.20013-7012, United States of America (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five new species of the Neotropical geocorid genus Epipolops are recognized, raising to 14 the number of known species. The new species E. angelaesp. nov., E. kathrynaesp. nov., E. scudderisp. nov., E. slaterisp. nov., and E. thomasisp. nov. are described, the identity of E. mucronatus Distant is clarified, and the nine previously known species are diagnosed and redescribed. Photographs, scanning electron photomicrographs, outline illustrations of all pronota and hemelytra, and an identification key are provided to help distinguish species.

Résumé

Epipolops, un genre néotropical des géocorides, comprend 14 espèces y comprit les cinq nouvelles décrites ici, E. angelaesp. nov., E. kathrynaesp. nov., E. scudderisp. nov., E. slaterisp. nov. et E. thomasisp. nov. L'identité de E. mucronatus Distant est clarifiée et des diagnoses et redecriptions sont fournies pour les neuf espèces antérieurment nommées. Des photos, des micrographies obtenue au microscope électronique à balayage, des dessins de tout les pronota et hemélytres, et un clef d'identification sont fournis pour aider à séparer les espèces.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 138 , Special Issue/Numéro spécial 4: Honouring Geoffrey G. E. Scudder/En hommage à Geoffrey G.E. Scudder , August 2006 , pp. 504 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashlock, P.D. 1957. An investigation of the taxonomic value of the phallus in the Lygaeidae (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 50: 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergroth, E. 1893. Notes synonymiques suivantes sur quelques Lygéides (Hémiptères). Bulletin Société Entomologique de France, 62: ccxxv.Google Scholar
Brailovsky, H. 1990. Descripción de dos epecies nuevas del género Epipolops H.S. de sudamérica (Hemiptera-Heteroptera-Lygaeidae Bledionotinae). Anales Instituto Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma México, Ser. Zool. 61: 125–132.Google Scholar
Canter, H.M. 1964. Contribuiçâo ao conhecimento do gênero Epipolops H.-Schaeffer, 1853 (Hemiptera, Lygaeidae, Geocorinae). Papéis Avulsos do Dept de Zoologia, Secretaria da Agriculture, São Paulo, Brasil, 16(6): 63–70.Google Scholar
De Geer, C. 1773. Mémoires pour servir à l'Histoire des Insects. Vol. III. P. Hosselberg, Stockholm. ii + 696 pp., 44 pl.Google Scholar
Distant, W.L. 1893. Insecta, Rhynchota: Hemiptera-Heteroptera. In Biologia Centrali-Americana. Vol. I. Edited by Goodman, F.D. and Salvin, O.. London. pp. i-xx + 329–462.Google Scholar
Hamid, A. 1975. A systematic revision of the Cyminae (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) of the world with a discussion of the morphology, biology, phylogeny and zoogeography. Occasional Papers of the Entomological Society of Nigeria, 14: 1–179.Google Scholar
Henry, T.J. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of the family groups with the infraorder Pentatomomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera), with emphasis on the Lygaeoidea. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 90: 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrich-Schaeffer, G.A.W. 1849–1851. Die Wanzenartigen Insecten. Lotzbeck, Nürnburg. 9: 1–44 (1849); 9: 45–256 (1850); 9: 257–348 (1851).Google Scholar
Lethierry, L.F., and Severin, G. 1894. Catalogue général des Hémiptères. Tome II. Coreidae, Berytidae, Lygaeidae, Pyrrhocoridae. R. Friedlander and Fils, Bruzelles and Berlin.Google Scholar
Piran, A.A. 1958. Hemiptera Neotropical I. Revista Sociedad Entomologica Argentina, 20: 57–61.Google Scholar
Slater, J.A. 1964. A catalogue of the Lygaeidae of the world. University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Slater, J.A. 1998. A new species of Epipolops H.S. from South America (Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea: Geocoridae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 106: 64–68.Google Scholar
Slater, J.A. 1999. The systematic position of the Pamphantinae with the description of two new tribes and a new species of Cattarus (Hemiptera: Lygaeoidea: Geocoridae). Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 63: 199–208.Google Scholar
Slater, J.A., and Henry, T.J. 1999. Notes on and descriptions of new Pamphantinae, including four new species of Cattarus and a remarkable new myrmecomorphic genus and species (Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea: Geocoridae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society, 107: 304–330.Google Scholar
Slater, J.A., and O'Donnell, J.E. 1995. A catalogue of the Lygaeidae of the world (1960–1994). New York Entomological Society, New York.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1862. Hemiptera Mexicana enumeravit speciesque novas descripsit. Stettin Entomologishe Zeitung, 23(1–3): 81–118; 23(4–6): 273–281; 23(7–9): 289–325; 23(10–12): 437–462.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1868. Hemiptera Fabriciana. Fabricianska Hemipterarter, efter de i Köpenhamn och Kiel förvarade typexemplaren granskade och beskrifne. 1. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 7(11): 1–148.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1870–1876. Enumeratio Hemipterorum: Bidrag till en företeckning öfver alla hittills kända Hemiptera, jemte systematiska meddelanden. Parts 1–5. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 1870, Part 1, 9(1): 1–232; 1872, Part 2, 10(4): 1–159; 1873, Part 3, 11(2): 1–163; 1874, Part 4,12(1): 1–186; 1876, Part 5, 14(4): 1–162.Google Scholar