Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:11:09.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD EXORISTINI (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE): I. PHOROCERA SUBGENUS PSEUDOTACHINOMYIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. M. Wood
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa

Abstract

The genus Phorocera Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, is shown to be holarctic, divisible into a palaearctic element, the subgenus Phorocera, with three species, and its nearctic sister-group, the subgenus Pseudotachinomyia Smith. 1917, with eight, of which four, angustiforceps, auriceps, convexa and exigua, are described as new. P. webberi Smith, the type species of Pseudotachinomyia, is removed from the synonymy of slossonae (Townsend) and longiforceps Brooks is synonymized with slossonae. Keys, descriptions and figures are provided for the adults and eggs of the eight nearctic species, and oviposition in P. webberi is described. Relationships of Pseudotachinomyia with the s.g. Phorocera and with other exoristine genera are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, J. M. and Webber, R. T.. 1924. The North American species of parasitic two-winged flies belonging to the genus Phorocera and allied genera. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 63 (Art. 17): 190.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. R. 1945. New Canadian Diptera (Tachinidae). Can. Ent. 77: 7896.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D. W. 1897. Revision of the Tachinidae of America north of Mexico. Bull. Dep. Agric. ent. Tech. Ser. 7, p. 1156, incl. corrected index.Google Scholar
Emden, F. I. van. 1954. Sect. a. Tachinidae and Calliphoridae. In Royal Entomological Society of London, Handbooks for the identification of British insects. Vol. 10, Part 4(a), p. 1133.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1950. Phylogenetic Systematics. Translated by Davis, D. D., and R., Zangerl. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1966. 263 p.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1957. Das weibliche Postabdomen der calyptraten Fliegen (Diptera) und sein Merkmalswert für die Systematik der Gruppe. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 45: 429461.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1960. Biologie der westpaläarktischen Raupenfliegen Dipt., Tachinidae. Z. angew. Ent., Hamburg Monogr. Beih. 16: 1188.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1963. Ein ungewöhnlich adaptierter Eilegeapparat bei den Raupenfliegen der Gattung Phorocera R.D. (Dipt., Tachinidae). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 117: 16.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1965. The fertilization of the egg in oviparous tachinids (Diptera). Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control 5: 142144.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L. 1939 a. Nouvelles suggestions sur la classification des Larvaevoridae. Verh. 7. int. Kongr. Ent., Weimar (1938) 1: 319328.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L. 1939 b. Essai sur les Tachinaires (Larvaevoridae). Monogrs. Cent. natl. Rech. agron. (Paris), Versailles 7: 167.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L. 1941. Revision des Phorocerini de l'ancien monde. (Larvaevoridae). Encycl. ent., Diptera (Paris) 10: 3780.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L. 1956. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). In Lindner, E. (Ed.). Fliegen palaearkt. Reg. 8 (64g): 513560.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L. 1960. Larvaevorinae (Tachininae). In Lindner, E. (Ed.). Fliegen palaearkt. Reg.: 609656.Google Scholar
Reinhard, H. J. 1935. Notes on the tachinid genus Pseudotachinomyia with descriptions of two new species (Diptera). Ent. News 46: 132135.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J. B. 1830. Essai sur les Myodaires. Mém. Acad. R. Sci., Inst. de France (Paris) 2, 813 p.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J. B. 1863. Histoire naturelle des Diptères des environs de Paris. Vol. 1. Masson & Fils, Paris. xvi + 1143 p.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C. W. and Arnaud, P. H. Jr. 1965. Family Tachinidae (Larvaevoridae). In Stone, A. et al. , A catalog of the Diptera of America north of Mexico. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Handb. 276, 1696 p.Google Scholar
Schaffner, J. V. Jr., and Griswold, C. L.. 1934. Macrolepidoptera and their parasites reared from field collections in the northeastern part of the United States. Misc. Publs U.S. Dep. Agric. 188, p. 1160.Google Scholar
Smith, H. E. 1917. Notes on New England Tachinidae with the description of one new genus and two new species. Psyche, Camb. 24: 5458.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1951. A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests. Section 2—Host Parasite Catalogue Part 1—Hosts of the Coleoptera and Diptera. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control, Ottawa. 147 p.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1908. The taxonomy of the muscoidean flies, including descriptions of new genera and species. Smithson. misc. Collns 51 (No. 1803): 1138.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1936. Manual of myiology in twelve parts. Pt. 4. Townsend & Filhos, São Paulo. 303 p.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1940. Manual of myiology in twelve parts Pt. 10. Townsend & Filhos, São Paulo. 335 p.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. 1932. Contribution à la classification des Tachinariae paléarctiques. 5e Congr. int. Ent., Paris, p. 240255.Google Scholar