Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:19:33.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REVISION OF THE ISMARINAE OF THE NEW WORLD (HYMENOPTERA, PROCTOTRUPOIDEA, DIAPRIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner
Lubomir Masner
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Ismarus Haliday of the New World is revised. Twenty-one species are recognized, described, and keyed, of which the following 16 are new: I. brevicornis n. sp. ♂ (Mexico), I. clarkae n. sp. ♀ (Canada), I. dux n. sp. ♂ (Panama, Costa Rica), I. flavicrus n. sp. ♀ (Mexico), I. flavigena n. sp. ♂ (Canada, U.S.A.), I. gibsoni n. sp. ♀ (Canada, U.S.A.), I. gracilis n. sp. ♀ ♂ (Mexico, Panama), I. helavai n. sp. ♀ (Panama), I. masoni n. sp. ♀ ♂ (Mexico), I. mexicanus n. sp. ♀ ♂ (Mexico), I. neotropicus n. sp. ♀ ♂ (Brazil), I. porteri n. sp. ♂ (Argentina), I. orion n. sp. ♀ (Mexico), I. rex n. sp. ♀ ♂ (Mexico), I. varicornis n. sp. ♀ (Brazil), and I. vigil n. sp. ♂ (U.S.A.). The hitherto unknown males of I. americanus Fouts and I. nevadensis Kieff. are described. I. rugulosus Foerst., I. halidayi Foerst., and I. flavicornis (Thorns.), previously known from Europe, are recorded from Canada and the U.S.A. Higher classification, interrelationships, and world distribution of Ismarus are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 11 , November 1976 , pp. 1243 - 1266
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chambers, V. H. 1955. Some hosts of Anteon spp. (Hym. Dryinidae) and a hyperparasite Ismarus (Hym. Belytidae). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 91: 114–115.Google Scholar
Dessart, P. 1967. Corrections in the systematic position of certain taxa of the Chalcidoidea and Proctotrupoidea (s.l.) with notes on synonymy. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 15: 551–559.Google Scholar
Dodd, A. P. 1926. New species of Australian Proctotrypoidea, with revisional notes. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 51: 369–381.Google Scholar
Fouts, R. M. 1924. New Bethylid and Serphoid parasites from North America (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 26: 159–166.Google Scholar
Hellén, W. 1964. Die Ismarinen und Belytinen Finnlands (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Fauna fenn. 18. 68 pp.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1916. Diapriidae. Das Tierreich 44. 627 pp.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M. A. 1971. Proctrotrupoids (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea) of the USSR. Horae soc. ent. Union Soviet. 54: 3–67.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1957. First preliminary report on the occurrence of genera of the group Proctotrupoidea in Czechoslovakia (Second part –superfamily Proctotrupoidea s. str.). (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Acta faun. ent. mus. nat. Pragae 2: 83–107.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1969. The geographic distribution of recent and fossil Ambostrinae (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea: Diapriidae). Ber. 10. Wandervers. dtsch. Ent. 80, pp. 105–109.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W. and Walkley, L. M.. 1951. In Muesebeck et al., Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico, Synoptic Catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2. 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. 1957. Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Diapriidae subfamily Belytinae. Handb. Identif. Brit. Insects 8. 107 pp.Google Scholar
Szabo, J. B. 1974. Neue Arten und Gattungen der Diapriiden aus der Mongolei (Hymenoptera, Diapriidae). Annls. hist-nat. Mus. natn. Hung. 66: 353–358.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1858. Skandinaviens proctotruper. Belytinae, Ismarinae. Öfvers. K. VetenskAkad. Förh. 15: 359–380.Google Scholar
Wall, I. 1967. Die Ismarinae und Belytinae der Schweiz. Ent. Abh. Mus. Tierk. Dresden 35: 123–265.Google Scholar