Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:08:55.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF THE GENUS CHRYSOCHARIS FÖRSTER (SUBGENUS CHRYSOCHARIS s. str.) (EULOPHIDAE: CHALCIDOIDEA) OF AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Carl M. Yoshimoto
Carl M. Yoshimoto
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Department of the Environment, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The subgenus Chrysocharis s. str. in America north of Mexico consists of 18 species. Of these, six are new: Chrysocharis beckeri, subcircularis, bellincus, clarkae, truncatipennis, and levipectus. The name giraulti is proposed for petiolata Girault nec Förster. Key to species, descriptions, host records, and illustrations are included. Relationships of species-groups of North America and Europe are discussed.

Résumé

Le sous-genre Chrysocharis s. str. en Amérique, au nord du Mexique consiste en 18 espèces. Parmi celles-ci, en voici six nouvelles : Chrysocharis beckeri, subcircularis, bellincus, clarkae, truncatipennis et levipectus. Le nom giraulti est proposé à place de petiolata Girault, nec Förster. L’auteur fournit des clés d’espèces, des descriptions et mentions d’hôtes et des figures. Il discute les rapports entre les groupes d’espèces nord-américaines et européennes.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 11 , November 1973 , pp. 1377 - 1405
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmead, W. H. 1894. Descriptions of thirteen new parasitic Hymenoptera bred by Prof. F. M. Webster. J. Cincinnati Soc. nat. Hist. 17: 45–55.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1961. Contributions to the chalcid fauna of the Moldavian SSR (Chalcidoidea). Trudy moldav. nauchno-issled. Inst. Sadov. Vinogr. Vinod. 7: 5–30.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1970. Contributions to the knowledge of Italian Chalcidoidea, based mainly on a study of the Institute of Entomology in Turin, with descriptions of some new European species (Hymenoptera). Memorie Soc. ent. Ital. 99: 35–102.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. and Askew, R. R.. 1968. Index of Palearctic Eulophidae (excl. Tetrastichinae) subfamily: Entedontinae, genus Chrysocharis, pp. 103–118. The Index of Entomophagous Insects. Le Francois, Paris. p. 254.Google Scholar
Burks, B. D. 1963. The Provancher species of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. 95: 1254–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burks, B. D. 1967. In Krombein, K. V. and Burks, B. D., Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2 (Suppl. 2), p. 232.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. C. 1912. Description of new Hymenoptera, No. 5. Proc. U.S. natl. Mus. 43: 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. C. 1913. Description of new Hymenoptera, No. 7. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 45: 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delucchi, V. 1954. Revision der Chalcidieraten der Gruppe Derostenus-Chrysocharis (Euloph., Entedontinae). Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 27: 281–305.Google Scholar
Erdös, J. 1956. Additamenta ad cognitionem faunae Chalcidoidarum in Hungaria et regionibus finitimis VI. 19. Eulophidae. Folia ent. hung. (s.n.), 9. 64 pp.Google Scholar
Gahan, A. B. 1917. Descriptions of some new parasitic Hymenoptera. Proc. U.S. natl. Mus. 53: 213–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1916. Descriptions of miscellaneous North American chalcidoid Hymenoptera of the family Eulophidae. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 51: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1917. Descriptiones Hymenopterorum Chalcidicarum variorum cum Observationibus, III. Glenndale, Md.16 pp.Google Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1918. New and old West Indian and North American chalcid flies (Hym.). Ent. News 19: 125–131.Google Scholar
Graham, M. W. R. de V. 1959. Keys to the British genera and species of Elachertinae, Eulophinae, Entedontinae, and Euderinae (Hym., Chalcidoidea). Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 13: 169–204.Google Scholar
Graham, M. W. R. de V. 1963. Additions and corrections to the British list of Eulophidae (Hym., Chalcidoidea), with descriptions of some new species. Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 15: 167–275.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. H. 1962. I—Biological control of pests of crops, fruit trees, ornamentals, and weeds in Canada up to 1959. In A review of the biological control attempts against insects and weeds in Canada. Tech. Commun. 2. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Contr., Trinidad. pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W., Krombein, K. V., Townes, H. K., and others. 1951. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2. 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. Suppl. 30. 1092 pp.Google Scholar
Stegmaier, C. E. 1972. Parasitic Hymenoptera bred from the family Agromyzidae (Diptera) with special reference to South Florida. Florida Ent. 55: 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1878. Hymenoptera Scandinaviae 5. Lundae. 307 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1839. Monographia Chalciditum I. London, 333 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1840. Descriptions of British Chalciditum. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 4.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1846. Characters of some undescribed species of Chalcidites. Ann. Mag nat. Hist. 17: 108-115, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, F. 1847. Characters of undescribed Chalcidites collected in North America by E. Doubleday, and now in the British Museum. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 20: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, F. 1848. List of the specimens of hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part 2, Chalcidites. — additional species. London. pp. 99–237.Google Scholar
Yoshimoto, C. M. 1973. Review of North American Chrysocharis (Kratochviliana) (Eulophidae: Chalcidoidea) north of Mexico, especially species attacking birch casebearer and birch leafminer. Can. Ent. 105: 1309–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar