Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:31:46.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REVIEW OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF RHIZOPHAGUS HERBST AND A REVISION OF THE NEARCTIC MEMBERS OF THE SUBGENUS ANOMOPHAGUS REITTER (COLEOPTERA: RHIZOPHAGIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Yves Bousquet
Yves Bousquet
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nearctic species of the subgenus Anomophagus Reitter of the genus Rhizophagus Herbst are revised. Four taxa are recognized: R. brunneus brunneus Horn 1879, R. brunneus fenyesi Méquignon 1913a, R. pseudobrunneus sp.nov., and R. galbus sp.nov.

For the other Nearctic species of the genus, a diagnosis, a type material section, and distributional notes are provided. Two new taxa are described, R. minutus rotundicollis and R. pusillus. Seven specific names are treated as new junior synonyms, namely (with the valid name in parentheses): R. longiceps Casey 1916 and R. rectus Casey 1916 (= R. cylindricus LeConte 1866); R. minutus quadriguttatus Méquignon 1913b (= R. minutus minutus Mmnerheim 1853); R. remotus luteus Méquignon 1913b (= R. remotus LeConte 1866); R. sculpturatus horni Méquignon 1913b (= R. sculpturatus Mannerheim 1852); R. dimidiatus testaceus Méquignon 1913b and R. dimidiatus assimilis Méquignon 1913b (= R. dimidiatus Mannerheim 1843). The subgenera name Syringobidia Casey 1916 (type species: R. cylindricus LeConte 1866) is treated as a new junior subjective synonym of Rhizophagus s.str. A key to all Nearctic species of Rhizophagus is provided with distribution maps of the species.

Résumé

Ce travail comprend une révision des espèces néarctiques du sous-genre Anomophagus Reitter appartenant au genre Rhizophagus Herbst. Quatre taxa y sont traités : R. brunneus brunneus Horn 1879, R. brunneus fenyesi Méquignon 1913a, R. pseudobrunneus sp.nov. et R. galbus sp.nov.

Pour chacune des autres espèces néarctiques du genre, l’auteur mentionne les caractères diagnostiques, traite des spécimens de la série-type et indique la répartition géographique. Deux nouveaux taxa sont décrits : R. minutus rotundicollis et R. pusillus. Sept noms du groupe-espèce sont traités comme nouveaux synonymes (le nom le plus ancien est indiqué entre parenthèses), soit R. longiceps Casey 1916 et R. rectus Casey 1916 (R. cylindricus LeConte 1866), R. minutus guadriguttatus Méquignon 1913b (= R. minutus minutus Mannerheim 1853), R. remotus luteus Méquignon 1913b (= R. remotus LeConte 1866), R. sculpturatus horni Méquignon 1913b (= R. sculpturatus Mannerheim 1852), R. dimidiatus testaceus Méquignon 1913b and R. dimidiatus assimilis Méquignon 1913b (= R. dimidiatus Mannerheim 1843). Le nom subgénérique Syringobidia Casey 1916 (espèce-type : R. cylindricus LeConte 1866) est considéré comme un synonyme plus récent de Rhizophagus s.str. Enfin, le lecteur trouvera un tableau de détermination et des cartes de répartition de toutes les espèces néarctiques du genre Rhizophagus.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 122 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 131 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, M. 1851. Käferfauna für Nord- und Mitteldeutschland, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die preussischen Rheinlande. Vo. 1. Coblenz. 414 pp.Google Scholar
Beaver, R.A. 1966. Notes on the fauna associated with elm bark beetles in Wytham Wood, Berks. 1. Coleoptera. Ent. mon. Mag. 102: 163–170.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An Illustrated Descriptive Catalogue of the Coleoptera or Beetles (exclusive of the Rhynchophora) Known to Occur in Indiana. The Nature Publishing Co., Indianapolis, IN. 1386 pp.Google Scholar
Bøving, A.G., and Craighead, F.C.. 1931. An Illustrated Synopsis of the Principal Larval Forms of the Order of Coleoptera. Brooklyn, NY. 351 pp.Google Scholar
Casey, T.L. 1884. Contributions to the descriptive and systematic coleopterology of North America, part II. Collins Printing House, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 61–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, T.L. 1916. Some random studies among the Clavicornia. pp. 35–300 in Memoirs on the Coleoptera VII. The New Era Printing Co., Lancaster, PA. 300 pp.Google Scholar
Chagnon, G., and Robert, A.. 1962. Principaux Coléoptères de la Province de Québec. Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qué. 440 pp.Google Scholar
Crowson, R.A. 1955. The Natural Classification of the Families of Coleoptera. Nathaniel Lloyd & Co., London. 187 pp.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1836. British Entomology; being illustrations and descriptions of the genera of insects found in Great Britain and Ireland: containing coloured figures from nature of the most rare and beautiful species, and in many instances of the plants upon which they are found. Vol. XIII. London.Google Scholar
Erichson, W.F. 1848. Naturgeschichte der Insecten Deutschlands. Erste Abtheilung. Coleoptera. Dritter Band. Berlin. 968 pp.Google Scholar
Everts, E.J.G. 1898. Coleoptera Neerlandica. De Schildvleugelige Insecten van Nederland en het aangrenzend Gebied, vol. 1, pt. 1. 'sGravenhage. 676 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, W.W. 1885. The Nitidulidae of Great Britain. Ent. mon. Mag. 22: 33–36, 69–78.Google Scholar
Ganglbauer, L. 1899. Die Käfer von Mitteleuropas. Die Käfer der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, Deutschlands, der Schweiz, sowie des französischen und italienischen Alpengebietes, vol. 3. Familienreihe Staphylinoidea, 2. Theil: Familienreihe Clavicomia. Wien. 1046 pp.Google Scholar
Grégoire, J.-C., Merlin, J., Pasteels, J.M., Jaffuel, R., Vouland, G., and Schvester, D.. 1985. Biocontrol of Dendroctonus micans by Rhizophagus grandis Gyll. (Col., Rhizophagidae) in the Massif Central (France). Z. ang. Ent. 99: 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyllenhal, L. 1813. Insecta Suecica. Classis I. Coleoptera siue Eleuterata. Tomi I. Pars III. 730 pp.Google Scholar
Gyllenhal, L. 1827. Insecta Suecica. Classis I. Coleoptera siue Eleuterata. Tomi I, Pars IV. 761 pp.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1962. The beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part III: Pselaphidae and Diversicomia I. University of Washington Publications in Biology, vol. 16. Seattle. 503 pp.Google Scholar
Herbst, J.F.W. 1793. Natursystem aller bekannten in- und auslandischen Insekten, als eine Fortsetzung der von Buffonschen Naturgeschichte. Berlin. 392 pp.Google Scholar
Horn, G.E. 1897. Revision of the Nitidulidae of the United States. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 8: 267–336.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 1963. The British species of the genus Rhizophagus Herbst (Coleoptera, Rhizophagidae). Rep. Trans. Manchester ent. Soc. (59th–61th Annual reports): 3–9.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.F. 1982. Coleoptera. pp. 482–553 in Parker, S.P. (Ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. Vol. 2. McGraw Hill Co., New York, NY. 1232 pp.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1866. Additions to the Coleopterous fauna of the United States. No. 1. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 1866 (19): 361–394.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1966. The ground-beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska. Part 4. Opusc. Ent. Suppl. 29: 409–648.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. 1843. Beitrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Aleutischen Inseln, der Insel Sitkha und Neu-Californiens. Bull. Soc. Imp. Natur. Moscou 16: 175–314.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. 1852. Zweiter Nachtrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Nord-Amerikanischen Laender des russischen Reiches. Bull. Soc. Imp. Natur. Moscou 25: 283–387.Google Scholar
Mannerheim, C.G. 1853. Dritter Nachtrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Nord-Amerikanischen Laender des russischen Reiches. Bull. Soc. Imp. Natur. Moscou 26: 95–273.Google Scholar
Marseul, S. de. 1885. Précis des genres & espèces de la tribu des Nitidulides de l'Ancien-Monde. L'Abeille 23: 19–142.Google Scholar
Méquignon, A. 1909. Révision des Rhizophagus Paléarctiques. L'Abeille 31: 103–119.Google Scholar
Méquignon, A. 1913 a. Description de trois Rhizophagus nouveaux (Col. Nitidulidae). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 1913: 90–92.Google Scholar
Méquignon, A. 1913 b. Synonymies et variétés nouvelles de Rhizophagus (Col. Nitidulidae). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 1913: 342–343.Google Scholar
Méquignon, A. 1914 a. Révision générale du genre Rhizophagus Herbst. L'Abeille 31: 157–180.Google Scholar
Méquignon, A. 1914 b. Fam. Rhizophagidae. In Junk, W., and Schenkling, S. (Eds.), Coleopterorum Catalogus. Pars 61. Berlin. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Moser, J.C. 1989. Inoculative release of an exotic predator for the biological control of the black turpentine beetle. pp. 189–200 in Kulhavy, D.L., and Miller, M.C. (Eds.), Potential for biological control of Dendroctonus and Ips bark beetles. Center for Applied Studies, School of Forestry, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches. 255 pp.Google Scholar
Nikitsky, N.B. 1976. The morphology of beetle larvae predaceous on and associated with bark beetles in the northwestern Caucasus. pp. 175–201in Mamayev, B.M. (Ed.), The Evolutionary Morphology of the Larvae of Insects. Moscow. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Nikitsky, N.B. 1984. Species of the genus Rhizophagus Hbst. (Coleoptera, Rhizophagidae) from the eastern Palearctic Region. Byull. Mosk. Ova. Ispyt. Prir. Otd. Biol. 89: 63–69. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Numberg, M. 1967. Chrzaszcze- Coleoptera, Obumierki- Rhizophagidae. Pol. Tow. Entomol. Klucze Oznaczania Owadow Pol. No. 19. 15 pp. [In Polish.]Google Scholar
Peacock, E.R. 1977. Coleoptera Rhizophagidae. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects, Vol. 5, Part 5(a). 23 pp.Google Scholar
Peacock, E.R. 1978. Notes on the subgenera of European Rhizophagidae (Coleoptera). Ent. scand. 9: 236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perris, E. 1877. Les larves de Coléoptères. Annls. Soc. Linn. Lyon 22: 259–418.Google Scholar
Pototskaya, V.A. 1977. The larval morphology of some species of the genus Rhizophagus Hbst. and the systematic position of this genus based on the study of larval features. pp. 65–79 in Pravdin, F.N. (Ed.), Stemboring Insects and their Entomophages. Nauka, Moscow. 254 pp. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1849. Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Wien. xxvii + 883 pp.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1858. Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Second edition. Wien. xliv + 1017 pp.Google Scholar
Redtenbacher, L. 1874. Fauna Austriaca. Die Käfer. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Third edition. Wien. xlvi + 564 + 571 pp.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1907. Coleopterologische Notizen. Wien. Ent. Z. 26: 27–30.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1911. Fauna Germanica. Die Käfer des Deutschen Reiches. Nach der analytischen Methode bearbeitet. Band III. Stuttgart. 436 pp.Google Scholar
Saalas, U. 1917. Die Fichtenkäfer Finlands. Studien über die Entwicklungsstadien, Lebensweise und geographische Verbreitung der an Picea excelsa Link. lebenden Coleopteren nebst einer Larvenbestimmungstabelle. I. Allgemeiner Teil und Spezieller Teil I. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A 8: 1–298.Google Scholar
Saalas, U. 1923. Die Fichtenkäfer Finlands. Studien über die Entwicklungsstadien, Lebensweise und geographische Verbreitung der an Picea excelsa Link. lebenden Coleopteren nebst einer Larvenbestimmungstabelle. II. Spezieller Teil 2 und Larvenbestimmungstabelle. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A 22: 1–746.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1823–1825. Descriptions of Coleopterous insects collected in the late expedition to the Rocky Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the command of Major Long. J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 3: 139–216 (1823), 238–282, 298–331, 403–462 (1824); 4: 88–99 (1825).Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1911. New Coleoptera and miscellaneous notes. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 19: 113–126.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. 1913. Notes on some North American species of Rhizophagus (Col. Nitid.). J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 21: 309–311.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G. 1875. Fauna Baltica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) der Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Dorpat. 560 pp.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G. 1887–1891. Fauna Baltica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) der Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Königsberg. lvi + 818 pp.Google Scholar
Seidlitz, G. 1891. Fauna Transsylvanica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) Siebenburgens. Königsberg. lvi + 914 pp.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. 1988. Review of the genera of the family Rhizophagidae (Clavicornia: Coleoptera) of the world. Mem. Zool. Surv. India 17: 1–58.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. and Biswas, D.N.. 1977. On the genus Rhizophagus Herbst (Coleoptera: Rhizophagidae) and description of a new species from India. Rec. Zool. Surv. India 72: 419–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, T., and De, M.. 1989. Rhizophagus Herbst from the Indian Region with description of seven new species (Coleoptera, Rhizophagidae). Elytron 2: 3–14.Google Scholar
Sharp, D., and Muir, F.. 1912. The comparative anatomy of the male genital tube in Coleoptera. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1912: 477–642 (+ 78 plates).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, C.B. 1862. Skandinaviens Coleoptera, Tom. IV. Lund. 269 pp.Google Scholar
Tozer, E.R. 1968. A new species of Rhizophagus Herbst (Coleoptera: Rhizophagidae) from Greece. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 37: 57–61.Google Scholar